Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Upgrading pfSense 2.4.5.1 to 2.5.1 unknown file system

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Firewalling
    32 Posts 2 Posters 3.3k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • jimpJ
      jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
      last edited by

      Curious. I've upgraded several ZFS systems from 2.4.5-p1 to 2.5.x without issue in the past.

      How were these installed? Is there just one disk or a mirror?

      Remember: Upvote with the ๐Ÿ‘ button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

      Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

      Do not Chat/PM for help!

      E 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • E
        Exocomp @jimp
        last edited by Exocomp

        @jimp interesting. It's just one disk.

        During original installation (v2.4.1) my notes show I selected

        • Auto (ZFS) Guided Root-on-ZFS
        • Leave everything as defaults
        • Stripe - No Redundancy
        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • jimpJ
          jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
          last edited by

          It's possible there was some difference in how the filesystem was made back on 2.4.1 that is part of the issue. Though I have a couple long-lived ZFS installs I'm not sure any were from that long ago at the moment since most get reinstalled now and then as they're in my lab.

          What shows up in zpool status on these?

          Remember: Upvote with the ๐Ÿ‘ button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

          Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

          Do not Chat/PM for help!

          E 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • E
            Exocomp @jimp
            last edited by

            @jimp Here is the result:

            zpool status
            

            05c99edb-b58e-4e06-9070-8f543ef36fde-image.png

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • jimpJ
              jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
              last edited by

              Maybe try updating the pool it to get around those errors:

              zpool upgrade -a
              gpart bootcode -b /boot/pmbr -p /boot/gptzfsboot -i 1 da0
              

              Though I'd still say your safest bet is to reinstall and restore the configuration. You should even be able to use the "Recover config.xml" option in the installer to make it simpler.

              Remember: Upvote with the ๐Ÿ‘ button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

              Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

              Do not Chat/PM for help!

              E 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • E
                Exocomp @jimp
                last edited by

                @jimp after running those commands its not able to boot at all.

                As you mentioned sounds like a complete reinstall is in order. Bummer.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • jimpJ
                  jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                  last edited by

                  I just installed a VM with 2.4.1 ZFS and upgraded to 2.4.5-p1 then 2.5.1 and it went without a hitch. There must be something off with those. Not sure what it might be, though.

                  Remember: Upvote with the ๐Ÿ‘ button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                  Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                  Do not Chat/PM for help!

                  E 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • E
                    Exocomp @jimp
                    last edited by

                    @jimp I'll do some more testing out of curiosity.

                    v2.4.1
                    SHA256: 738C47B549284B158CC3F174288A5B47AD6F112728D5BAFD11412A1B77DA32F9

                    Above was the sha256 of v2.4.1 I installed from.

                    I don't have sha256 of v2.4.5.1 (since I used the web installer), can you provide it here and I'll download and do the same test as you but with my configuration.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • E
                      Exocomp @jimp
                      last edited by

                      @jimp I reinstalled 2.4.1 just to test, how I can I upgrade it to 2.4.5.1, is that possible through the system update web interface? Can you please direct me to the steps to do so.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • jimpJ
                        jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                        last edited by

                        It is kind of tricky due to the age of it, the easiest way is to go to a shell prompt and run pfSense-upgrade -c a few times in a row until it offers 2.4.5-p1, you may also need to pick the 2.4.5 update branch after running it a couple times.

                        The installer hashes wouldn't have anything to do with this, if it was wrong it would be much more broken.

                        Remember: Upvote with the ๐Ÿ‘ button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                        Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                        Do not Chat/PM for help!

                        E 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • E
                          Exocomp @jimp
                          last edited by Exocomp

                          @jimp I'm able to reproduce the issue with a fresh install of v2.4.5.1 then upgrade to v2.5.1.

                          I installed using pfSense-CE-2.4.5-RELEASE-p1-amd64.iso (sha256 0a09a7748419c86c665eb8d908f584e96d54859aa13f4eeb175a60548c70e228).

                          Then I used the web interface to upgrade to 2.5.1 which was successful then on first boot I get the same issue.

                          Is this the same way you're upgrading?

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • E
                            Exocomp @jimp
                            last edited by

                            @jimp I did the same test but using ufs and the upgrade and boot up is fine.

                            So definitely related to zfs and fresh install of 2.4.5.1 to 2.5.1, at least for me.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • E
                              Exocomp @jimp
                              last edited by Exocomp

                              @jimp I tried a fresh install of v2.5.1 and now I get a boot loop.

                              The following is broken on v2.5.1:

                              VM: Hyper-V Gen2 ZFS

                              Let me know what you need to file this as a bug.

                              I noticed others have reported a similar issue: https://forum.netgate.com/topic/161130/upgrading-to-2-5-0-on-hyperv-boot-loops

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • jimpJ
                                jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                                last edited by

                                Probably nothing for us to do there, it's likely between FreeBSD and Hyper-V.

                                I have no problems with ZFS and that scenario on KVM or ESX.

                                Remember: Upvote with the ๐Ÿ‘ button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                                Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                                Do not Chat/PM for help!

                                E 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • E
                                  Exocomp @jimp
                                  last edited by Exocomp

                                  @jimp fair point, if I can find some time I will test FreeBSD Hyper-V Gen2 ZFS.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • E
                                    Exocomp @jimp
                                    last edited by

                                    @jimp Looks like someone else has already done the testing and found it works with FreeBSD 12.2 release and Hyper-V Gen2 ZFS so sounds like something in pfSense.

                                    Here are relevant bugs filed:

                                    • Pfsense 2.5.0 not working with Generation 2 Hyper-V VM
                                    • pfsense 2.4.5_1 does not boot on Gen2 2012R2 HyperV VM
                                    • Installer does not add required module to loader.conf when using ZFS
                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • E
                                      Exocomp @jimp
                                      last edited by Exocomp

                                      @jimp I was able to get v2.5.1 to load, can you please make sure the necessary engineers get this.

                                      What works: On the boot screen choose option 6 and load from "kernal.old"

                                      Summary:

                                      System config: pfSense v2.5.1 on Hyper-V Gen2 ZFS

                                      The issue is not that the following is missing from /boot/loader.conf

                                      opensolaris_load="YES" 
                                      zfs_load="YES"
                                      

                                      The problem is loading with the default kernal in v2.5.1, however, using kernal.old works.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • jimpJ
                                        jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                                        last edited by

                                        Loading kernel.old is not a valid path forward. It means you're running an old 2.4.x kernel on a 2.5.x base and any number of problems may result.

                                        The symptoms don't quite line up with the errors on the linked Redmine issues, but if using either a Gen 1 VM or UFS works, that would be the best thing to do on Hyper-V now.

                                        Remember: Upvote with the ๐Ÿ‘ button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                                        Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                                        Do not Chat/PM for help!

                                        E 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • E
                                          Exocomp @jimp
                                          last edited by

                                          @jimp my point simply was that since "kernel.old" works that means that the problem is with pfSense on the new kernel and not with FreeBSD.

                                          It appears the conclusion of those issues is that the necessary parameters were missing (opensolaris_load & zfs_load) however the issue here is that the new pfsense kernel has the problem. So I agree this issue is slightly different.

                                          The points you make are currently the only way forward.

                                          From my standpoint and others (it is common sense) it leaves us with a less than optimal solution and leaves us with a broken upgrade path forward.

                                          I hope that at least a bug can be opened on this so that is looked at by the respective product owners and engineers, so that in a future release this can be fixed.

                                          Are you able to file the bug?

                                          jimpJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • jimpJ
                                            jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate @Exocomp
                                            last edited by

                                            @exocomp said in Upgrading pfSense 2.4.5.1 to 2.5.1 unknown file system:

                                            @jimp my point simply was that since "kernel.old" works that means that the problem is with pfSense on the new kernel and not with FreeBSD.

                                            That doesn't hold logically because the kernel is the FreeBSD kernel, pfSense code comes into play after that. So if loading kernel.old works, it's more likely a FreeBSD issue than a pfSense issue.

                                            I hope that at least a bug can be opened on this so that is looked at by the respective product owners and engineers, so that in a future release this can be fixed.

                                            Are you able to file the bug?

                                            I can't replicate the bug so I don't have all of the details available to do so. It's possible that https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/11469 is close to what you are seeing but the person who opened that bug linked to a thread for a 2.4.x issue and didn't give a complete error -- your error is different than the 2.4.x error, but since the original reporter of #11469 did not specify the complete message, it was closed as a duplicate given the other details they posted.

                                            I still suggest trying a recent FreeBSD 12.2-STABLE snapshot with ZFS in a Hyper-V Gen2 VM for yourself and see if it works -- The 12.2-RELEASE of FreeBSD was a while ago and pfSense is using code from after that point so using 12.2-RELEASE is not a proper comparison.

                                            Remember: Upvote with the ๐Ÿ‘ button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                                            Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                                            Do not Chat/PM for help!

                                            E 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.