Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    EasyRule Adds Rule to Wrong Interface

    Firewalling
    2
    13
    1.2k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • planedropP
      planedrop
      last edited by

      Hi Everyone,

      Diagnosing a VLAN issue here and came across some really strange behavior with PFSense. I'll provide photos below which should make it pretty self explanatory. Basically, when adding an easyRule from Firewall logs, it doesn't actually put that rule on the right interface.

      853c9e5f-1d16-4feb-a036-a320a34f174f-image.png

      I click the plus on the destination to make the EasyRule and then this happens.

      1f52e6b2-05d4-436c-861c-fd9279bf782c-image.png

      So far so good right?

      Then I click confirm and this happens.Capture.JPG

      The rule ends up on an entirely different interface, and I'm thinking something might be wrong with my install here or something. As I've had some other odd behavior happen with this WANUPLINKS interface (which to be clear is just a LAN interface which I've named that as I double NAT some test firewalls behind this install).

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • planedropP
        planedrop
        last edited by planedrop

        Note: just FYI I changed the TrueNAS IP to the .50 you see here instead of the .100, wanted to see if an IP change/refresh on the TrueNAS would help.

        Additionally it seems my firewall rules for my TrueNAS in specific aren't being respected, whenever accessing the TrueNAS on my management interface VLAN (from the LAN) it constantly refreshes (but does connect) and I get a massive log pile of the below despite there being a pass rule for this traffic:

        f78c8a56-6575-4d26-b3a2-9f86a2bd7365-image.png

        This indicates to me that despite this IP allow passing of all traffic from my LAN PC to the management IP of TrueNAS, it's blocking it anyway.

        Also the previous issue in this post seems to be related to that being my original default LAN interface that I renamed later, is that just how EasyRules work? Do they not dynamically updated with the correct interface?

        johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • johnpozJ
          johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @planedrop
          last edited by

          What its blocking is out of state traffic..

          Your blocks are Acks.. notice the FPA, FA and PA..

          You have states resetting? Or your asymmetrical?

          An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
          If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
          Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
          SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.7.2, 24.11

          planedropP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • planedropP
            planedrop @johnpoz
            last edited by

            @johnpoz Right, this makes sense. I'm not sure what would be resetting the states so frequently though as there are pass rules that should have states open for a while right?

            I can't help but think something else is going on here but just not sure what it is. The thing is, no other HTTP/S traffic is having the states reset like this, and since it's all using the same rule with Alias's I can't help but think something's not right.

            johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • johnpozJ
              johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @planedrop
              last edited by

              You could be having a state reset via a RST from one end, and firewall closing the state. While the other one is sending FIN.

              Are you saying the connection never works? Or you just see blocks in your firewall? Could be old session that never got closed because the client trying to resuse old, or when switching from different network - do you have multiple wifi networks?

              You should sniff the whole conversation to figure out what is actually going on. But if you see blocks with A (acks) then its out of state traffic blocking them.. Normal blocks would be via the SYN (S), where pfsense says NO not going to open what your trying to go to..

              If you see SA blocks (syn,ack) then that screams asymmetrical where pfsense never saw the syn to open the state. Other things with A like FA or RA - point to for whatever reason state is not there.. being closed from one end, reset by the firewall.. This can happen with a wan going offline and setting to reset states when that happens??

              You would need to investigate deeper.. But setting a firewall rule is not going to get rid of out of state blocks.

              An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
              If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
              Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
              SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.7.2, 24.11

              planedropP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • planedropP
                planedrop @johnpoz
                last edited by

                @johnpoz I can still connect to the web interface on the TrueNAS here, it just resets periodically. So I'll be using it to adjust something and it will just disconnect and refresh the page, but it's not happening when I access it on the same VLAN which does indicate something is happening with the firewall.

                I do have multiple wifi networks but all clients here are on ethernet.

                Appreciate the info here, I will do some more sniffing to see if I can figure out exactly what is going on here, it's definitely a bit odd behavior though. I get that firewall rules won't get rid of out of state blocks, but at the same time, shouldn't adding the firewall rule allow the state to be established in the first place?

                johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • johnpozJ
                  johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @planedrop
                  last edited by johnpoz

                  @planedrop said in EasyRule Adds Rule to Wrong Interface:

                  state to be established in the first place?

                  You would never have gotten connected ever if state wasn't created - and you would see a block on Syn only..

                  If your saying works, and then resets - points to either say the server closing the connection with Fin or RST and state being closed, until client reopens with SYN.. Or states resetting if pfsense was resetting all the states - then you would see such blocks for every connection..

                  Sniffing is your friend in trying to figure out what is going on.. when you create the connection and page first loads - you can check for yourself there is a state.

                  When on same vlan - then no states, no having to recreate a session if one side sends fin and other end doesn't want to close the session yet.

                  Sniffing will show you exactly what is going on.. Also watch states via pfsense state table, etc.

                  when I access it on the same VLAN

                  Your client that accesses the nas is not multihomed is it? Where one leg in the nas leg and another leg not in that vlan?

                  An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                  If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                  Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                  SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.7.2, 24.11

                  planedropP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • planedropP
                    planedrop @johnpoz
                    last edited by

                    @johnpoz Thanks for the help here, I will dig into this more after work today to see if I can figure it out and report back in case others see the same behavior. It would seem this could come down to an issue with the TrueNAS since the initial connection is being made so the state should be created.

                    I didn't even think about the fact that the same VLAN doesn't require states, which would prevent me from noticing the issue even if TrueNAS was doing it, thanks for that, just didn't click in my head for some reason!

                    Really appreciate the help and thoughts here!

                    johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • johnpozJ
                      johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @planedrop
                      last edited by

                      Well there is no firewall states that could or allow or not allow traffic. There is still typical handshakes to open and close the tcp session.. But if your not seeing the stated closed because oneside sends a fin and the other doesn't want to answer the fin, etc.

                      So depending on what your actually seeing in the browser - can you tell when this happens in the browser or connection to the nas, or are you just noticing it in the firewall log?

                      An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                      If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                      Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                      SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.7.2, 24.11

                      planedropP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • planedropP
                        planedrop @johnpoz
                        last edited by

                        @johnpoz I can also tell when it's happening in the browser, the entire management GUI refreshes and reconnects every 10-15 seconds when accessing it across VLANs.

                        johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • johnpozJ
                          johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @planedrop
                          last edited by

                          and what your connecting from is only in the 1 network, its not multihomed where it could have a connection to the nas via multiple paths. Or the nas its not multihomed? Where you could have some asymmetrical flow?

                          An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                          If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                          Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                          SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.7.2, 24.11

                          planedropP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • planedropP
                            planedrop @johnpoz
                            last edited by

                            @johnpoz The NAS is multi homed, however it's default connection is the management network, so I don't think that would be the cause either.

                            I haven't had time to do some packet captures yet but I will give that a shot soon.

                            johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • johnpozJ
                              johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @planedrop
                              last edited by

                              @planedrop said in EasyRule Adds Rule to Wrong Interface:

                              so I don't think that would be the cause either.

                              Multihome devices with legs in multiple networks are quite often a source of asymmetrical traffic flow.

                              If you talk to it from 192.168.X.X network to its 192.168.Y.Y address and has an interface in 192.168.X it will answer back from that interface.. almost always!

                              An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                              If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                              Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                              SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.7.2, 24.11

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.