Suricata Won't Auto Start

ProperCactus

Except maybe I didn't... hmmmm


igb0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
	description: RED
	options=8100b8<VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,JUMBO_MTU,VLAN_HWCSUM,VLAN_HWFILTER>
	ether 00:e0:67:26:3f:68
	inet6 fe80::2e0:67ff:fe26:3f68%igb0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1
	inet 192.168.1.4 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255
	media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT <full-duplex>)
	status: active
	nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
igb1: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
	description: GREEN
	options=8100b8<VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,JUMBO_MTU,VLAN_HWCSUM,VLAN_HWFILTER>
	ether 00:e0:67:26:3f:69
	inet6 fe80::2e0:67ff:fe26:3f69%igb1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2
	inet 192.168.2.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.2.255
	media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT <full-duplex>)
	status: active
	nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
igb2: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
	description: BLUE
	options=8100b8<VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,JUMBO_MTU,VLAN_HWCSUM,VLAN_HWFILTER>
	ether 00:e0:67:26:3f:6a
	inet6 fe80::2e0:67ff:fe26:3f6a%igb2 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3
	inet 192.168.3.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.3.255
	media: Ethernet autoselect
	status: no carrier
	nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
igb3: flags=8802<BROADCAST,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
	options=e507bb<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,JUMBO_MTU,VLAN_HWCSUM,TSO4,TSO6,LRO,VLAN_HWFILTER,VLAN_HWTSO,RXCSUM_IPV6,TXCSUM_IPV6>
	ether 00:e0:67:26:3f:6b
	media: Ethernet autoselect
	status: no carrier
	nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
enc0: flags=41<UP,RUNNING> metric 0 mtu 1536
	groups: enc
	nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
lo0: flags=8049<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 16384
	options=680003<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,LINKSTATE,RXCSUM_IPV6,TXCSUM_IPV6>
	inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128
	inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x6
	inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000
	inet 10.255.255.254 netmask 0xffffffff
	groups: lo
	nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
pflog0: flags=100<PROMISC> metric 0 mtu 33160
	groups: pflog
pfsync0: flags=0<> metric 0 mtu 1500
	groups: pfsync

bmeeks

@propercactus said in Suricata Won't Auto Start:

@bmeeks said in Suricata Won't Auto Start:

Is it perhaps an IPv6 address for either the LAN or OP1 interface?

I disabled ipv6 so I don't even know why it's getting ipv6 addresses at all!

Those are the default Link-Local addresses the operating system adds by default.

For some reason, pfSense is returning an unexpected value when Suricata queries it for interface IP address info during startup. The most likely scenario, in my mind, is that the particular interface has not finished "coming up" at the time Suricata asks pfSense about it. Of course that's just an educated guess. Looking at the HOME_NET list shown in the log, do you see an IP that is missing? The default HOME_NET should include all the locally-attached interface subnets, except on the WAN it will only include the firewall's public WAN IP (and not the whole WAN subnet you are connected into on your ISP's side).

ProperCactus

@bmeeks said in Suricata Won't Auto Start:

@propercactus said in Suricata Won't Auto Start:

@bmeeks said in Suricata Won't Auto Start:

Is it perhaps an IPv6 address for either the LAN or OP1 interface?

I disabled ipv6 so I don't even know why it's getting ipv6 addresses at all!

Those are the default Link-Local addresses the operating system adds by default.

For some reason, pfSense is returning an unexpected value when Suricata queries it for interface IP address info during startup. The most likely scenario, in my mind, is that the particular interface has not finished "coming up" at the time Suricata asks pfSense about it. Of course that's just an educated guess. Looking at the HOME_NET list shown in the log, do you see an IP that is missing? The default HOME_NET should include all the locally-attached interface subnets, except on the WAN it will only include the firewall's public WAN IP (and not the whole WAN subnet you are connected into on your ISP's side).

I reckon it's the wireguard tun_wg0 because on reboot ther routes to the gateway don't get set properly either

bmeeks

@propercactus said in Suricata Won't Auto Start:

I reckon it's the wireguard tun_wg0 because on reboot ther routes to the gateway don't get set properly either

I would agree. I'm not a wireguard user, but if that tunnel is not completely up at the time Suricata is starting, then pfSense could very well return unexpected information to Suricata when queried about it.

cmcdonald

@propercactus Suricata + WireGuard is something that needs testing, I personally haven't tested it.

WireGuard interfaces are created as early as possible (there is an earlyshellcmd that kicks this off, and it's pushed to the very top of the earlyshellcmd list just to be extra certain it's ran first).

If I'm understanding correctly, Suricata isn't starting even though it isn't configured to monitor tun_wg0?

ProperCactus

@bmeeks yea that was it, when I removed the wireguard S2S it works now on reboot. Gunna have to revert to IPsec S2S I think.

@theonemcdonald said in Suricata Won't Auto Start:

If I'm understanding correctly, Suricata isn't starting even though it isn't configured to monitor tun_wg0?

Exactly yes, it's trying to get an ipv6 address from tun_wg0 to add to HOME_NET and it sticks a dummy value called "Array" in the list instead which breaks the Suricata config.

bmeeks

Suricata, when starting or regenerating the suricata.yaml configuration file for an interface, will ask pfSense for a list of all local interfaces so that it can generate a default HOME_NET variable that includes the IP subnets for all the locally-attached interfaces. As I mentioned before, for the WAN side, it will only include the actual public WAN IP (so a /32 subnet mask). For the other local interfaces, it will ask pfSense for the mask info.

cmcdonald

@ProperCactus what if you as a test assign an IPv6 address to your tun_wg0 interface. Just so it doesn't return an empty array?

ProperCactus

@theonemcdonald that might do it coz currently it's this:

tun_wg0: flags=80c1<UP,RUNNING,NOARP,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1420
	options=80000<LINKSTATE>
	inet 10.128.128.1 netmask 0xffffff00
	groups: wg WireGuard
	nd6 options=101<PERFORMNUD,NO_DAD>

I will try with the ipv6 but first i'm trying to understand what I do gateway wise as it doesn't seem right to create static routes out a gateway that is not connected to the tunnel like you suggest?

ProperCactus

@theonemcdonald

tun_wg0: flags=80c1<UP,RUNNING,NOARP,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
	description: WREGRD
	options=80000<LINKSTATE>
	inet 10.128.128.1 netmask 0xffffffff
	inet6 fd1f:c547:3e98:b32f:: prefixlen 64
	groups: wg WireGuard
	nd6 options=101<PERFORMNUD,NO_DAD>

Gave it a local link ipv6 but the issue persists.

If I delete the tun_wg0 the issue goes away.