• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
Netgate Discussion Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

Squidguard does not enforce Google Safe Search

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Cache/Proxy
10 Posts 2 Posters 2.6k Views
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • R
    r0utevv3
    last edited by Jun 29, 2016, 12:52 AM

    How can I enforce google safe search? I have cheked the option that enable it in squidgard and it doesn't work. In openwrt it was as easy as modify the etc/host and redirect google.com to forcesafesearch.google.com, but now that URL doesn't even exist. Thanks in advance

    It's not a bug, it's an undocumented feature

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • A
      aGeekhere
      last edited by Jun 29, 2016, 1:42 AM

      Here
      https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=112335.0

      Never Fear, A Geek is Here!

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • R
        r0utevv3
        last edited by Jun 29, 2016, 4:04 AM

        Yes, but I don't know if it's me (my computer, my network?), but 216.239.38.120 is not google safe search anymore, just google.com

        It's not a bug, it's an undocumented feature

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • A
          aGeekhere
          last edited by Jun 29, 2016, 4:50 AM

          If you ping forcesafesearch.google.com you get 216.239.38.120.
          Google safe search has not changed and is working.

          Never Fear, A Geek is Here!

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • R
            r0utevv3
            last edited by Jun 29, 2016, 5:28 AM

            It's strange, because I get this with forcesafesearch.google.com :

            and with 216.239.38.120. just redirects me to a normal google

            It's not a bug, it's an undocumented feature

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • A
              aGeekhere
              last edited by Jun 29, 2016, 6:11 AM

              It's strange, because I get this with forcesafesearch.google.com
              and with 216.239.38.120. just redirects me to a normal google

              You have to first make pfsense your dns server and create a host override for each google domain to 216.239.38.120, follow the first part of the guide and you should have it working in no time.

              Never Fear, A Geek is Here!

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • R
                r0utevv3
                last edited by Jul 2, 2016, 4:54 AM

                Yes, I am going to make that, but what I say is that if I go to my browser, and in the hyperlink section I put 216.239.38.120 and type enter, it redirects me to google.com, and does not activate google safe search (I still can see adult content). And that happens in all the LANs I have checked. I think google change the ip or somethinkg like that. But I can't find the new one

                It's not a bug, it's an undocumented feature

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • A
                  aGeekhere
                  last edited by Jul 3, 2016, 11:15 AM

                  I do not think you can just use that address in the browser, it is ment for router DNS redirecting.

                  Never Fear, A Geek is Here!

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • R
                    r0utevv3
                    last edited by Jul 3, 2016, 7:22 PM Jul 3, 2016, 7:12 PM

                    I am going to check that. But in the past I was capable to use that ip in the browser (Google safe search was activated alone) and then I did something with openwrt to redirect all google domains to 216.239.38.120. After all router DNS redirecting simply assigns a domain name to a different ip address. So that ip address should be a webpage with safe search enabled by default, isn't?

                    It's not a bug, it's an undocumented feature

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • R
                      r0utevv3
                      last edited by Oct 3, 2016, 1:39 AM

                      Your method doesn't work for me. I have already follow your instructions and still nothing. Please help!

                      It's not a bug, it's an undocumented feature

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.
                        This community forum collects and processes your personal information.
                        consent.not_received