[Solved] 2.3.2 on ESXi 5.5.0U3 - network performance issue
-
Hey,
sorry for my English, it's not my native language.
So far I managed to setup one vm as part of a CARP setup. Most of the stuff is working now(NAT,VIPs,CP+freeradius…). But it seems like I can't get a decent performance out of the box.
My hardware:
- vmware host - ESXi 5.5.0U3
- hp nc364t
- bridged all four ports through to pfsense as vmxnet3
- vm with 2CPUs x 1Core, 2G Ram
Pfsense-settings:
- 2.3.2 Pfsense
- CPU Type: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.80GHz/2 CPUs: 2 package(s) x 1 core(s)
- simple nat on Lan-side, CaptivePortal turned off
- Wan 10 FW-Rules, Lan 2 Rules
- 4 Interfaces; 1xWan 1xLan 1xProjectlan(enabled but unused) 1xSync
- 3 VIPs
- Packages: AutoConfigBackup/Backup/darkstat/freeradius2/iftop/iperf/OpenVMTools
I ran iperf against pfsense:
Wan-side -> 288-504 Mbits/s
Lan-side -> 216-277 Mbits/s
(disabled CP,darkstate)
While I ran tested the WebUI was not accessable!I also tried a debian8 vm on the same card/ports against iperf and I got over 900 Mbits/s, using the e1000 driver.
It looks like I am doing something wrong :oWhat is the recommanded vmware driver for better pfsense performance, e1000e or vmxnet3? Is there anything else I could try, maybe more resources?
Thanks for your time
otziEdit: forget to mention vmware-tools are installed
-
did you iperf thru pfsense? Pfsense is a router/firewall not really optimized for answering traffic to itself.
What do you mean you bridged thru all 4 interfaces? In esxi you would have a vmkern, and then other vswitch(es) for your other hardware interfaces. Can you post your esxi network configuration. Example below is mine.
-
did you iperf thru pfsense? Pfsense is a router/firewall not really optimized for answering traffic to itself.
I used iperf against the pfsense itself.
Early this week, after I finished setting up this pfsense box, I noticed that speed maxed out at 300, sometimes at 450MBits/s testing it against a decent nas-box(physical no vm) doing simple ftp. Normally I get 600-700 Mbits/s from this nas, sometimes less depending the network; … While I was moving files from wan2lan I couldn't even load the WebUI. So I requested another cpu and 2GB Ram in total. Performance didn't change after this, so I changed adapter type from e1000 to vmxnet3 on esxi. But it's still isn't moving any faster?! I figured that I should try another vm on the same vswitch, thought it would be better for comparison. As I said debian8 is getting 900+ through, with 1core 1GB ram.What do you mean you bridged thru all 4 interfaces? In esxi you would have a vmkern, and then other vswitch(es) for your other hardware interfaces. Can you post your esxi network configuration. Example below is mine.
You are right. I didn't bridge the adapter through. I meant to say that nothing else is running on those physical ports; only pfsense.
However I attached the network vswitch-overview. I am not the main administrator of the esxi - I am running another smaller machine(centos-vm-host) which will be the backup-CARP-member. Anyway I think the vswitch-setup isn't the issue, but correct me if I'm wrong.
I looked, but couldn't find any reports indicating problems regarding pfsense 2.3.2 running on esxi 5.5.0U3!
-
What are you hiding here, is that your pfsense setup? Why would its lan/wan be the same vswitch?
What are those other networks on each vswitch. I don't see more than 1 vm on those switches - so only pfsense?
So what is your Iperf THRU pfsense.. ie that is routing/firewalling.. Testing to pfsense IP is not a valid test of the performance of pfsense as a router/firewall its a test of how fast you could move a file to pfsense directly, etc.
-
I changed the vm settings and it seems to be all good now. :)
After reading the hardware requirements https://www.pfsense.org/hardware/:501+ Mbps -> Multiple cores at > 2.0GHz are required. Server class hardware with PCI-e network adapters.
I ended up with more cores…
What are you hiding here, is that your pfsense setup? Why would its lan/wan be the same vswitch?
Well, yes… I am hiding the public dns/ip.
Arguably lan/wan on one vswitch doesn't make much sense and I will change that....What are those other networks on each vswitch. I don't see more than 1 vm on those switches - so only pfsense?
So what is your Iperf THRU pfsense.. ie that is routing/firewalling.. Testing to pfsense IP is not a valid test of the performance of pfsense as a router/firewall its a test of how fast you could move a file to pfsense directly, etc.
I did a lot of file transfers and watched the traffic graph max out around 950 or something… I will do iperf through the pfsense as you recommend and report back tomorrow.
However I can mark the thread [SOLVED].
Thanks
