"ufs in RAM" on dashboard, when using ZFS
-
Is it OK?
Should it be reported as cosmetic bug or it's really UFS? Sorry for stupid question…
-
Check the output of "mount" to see what is really on there. If it's ZFS, then open a bug report.
-
Forgive my ignorance, but it's that a ram drive? If it is, then there is no usefulness to using ZFS on a ram drive.
-
/var/run is typically a RAM drive, yes, and that is likely correct as-is, but it's worth verifying with mount to ensure what is on his system matches what is in the GUI.
-
Yes jimp, thanks for the tip, I've checked with mount and found that it's RAM drive and it's UFS.
I don't know why but I was thinking that ramdisk for ZFS should be created with
zpool create RAM /dev/mdx "by design", but looks like it can be done in any way, if it does not matter like Harvy66 mentioned.
