Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    CARP alternative

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved HA/CARP/VIPs
    24 Posts 7 Posters 5.7k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • J
      Jesper Freesbug
      last edited by

      Hi!

      I have two PFSense machines running in a virtual datacenter.
      Unfortunately, the provider does not support CARP in that datacenter.
      I wonder if there is any CARP alternative out there that can be used with PFSense?

      For the Linux machines, I am using keepalived, which works perfectly fine. However, keepalived
      support for FreeBSD has been abandoned long ago, and I am not sure if I should even
      try to get it running on PFSense.

      Do you have any suggestions or hints?

      Thanks!
      Jesper

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • jimpJ
        jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
        last edited by

        There are no alternatives to failover, CARP is the only working mechanism at the moment.

        We're looking at freevrrpd but if the provider doesn't support CARP, that's unlikely to work either as the base mechanism is similar.

        Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

        Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

        Do not Chat/PM for help!

        ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • J
          Jesper Freesbug
          last edited by

          Aww…, thanks for the info.

          Keepalived uses VRRP, too, and it works. So maybe the freevrrpd could work as well.
          I'll take a closer look at the differences between these protocols.

          Do you think there will be a PFSense package to test freevrrpd in the near future?
          Just tell me if you need a beta tester  :)

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • jimpJ
            jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
            last edited by

            CARP sends the same type of traffic that VRRP does, only a slightly different format. I find it hard to believe that VRRP would work but CARP would not in the same environment.

            No ETA on any testing for anything, it's not clear when we might get around to trying that out. Certainly not for 2.4.

            Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

            Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

            Do not Chat/PM for help!

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • J
              Jesper Freesbug
              last edited by

              CARP sends the same type of traffic that VRRP does, only a slightly different format.

              As far as I can tell from the man page of CARP and the VRRP RFC, there is a difference in the traffic.
              VRRP promotes a single virtual MAC address, whereas CARP makes use of a multicast MAC address.

              The OpenBSD man page (http://man.openbsd.org/OpenBSD-current/man4/carp.4) says:

              However, there are a few OS and routers that do not accept a multicast MAC address being mapped to a unicast IP.

              Which I believe could cause some trouble, though I am neither a network nor a virtualization expert.
              The manual also describes some work arounds (i.e. ip-stealth mode), which I think are not a good idea to
              use in a network managed by someone else.

              Anyhow, you are propably right about saying that using CARP should be possible, too…

              Cheers!

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • J
                Jesper Freesbug
                last edited by

                Just for the record, my provider confirmed that the Multicast MAC is the problem.
                Their cloud network infrastructure doesn't support it yet.
                Perhaps they are using Infiband which makes trouble or so, I don't know.  :o

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • ?
                  A Former User @jimp
                  last edited by A Former User

                  @jimp said in CARP alternative:

                  There are no alternatives to failover, CARP is the only working mechanism at the moment.

                  We're looking at freevrrpd but if the provider doesn't support CARP, that's unlikely to work either as the base mechanism is similar.

                  Almost five years later, I'm wondering if freevrrpd is still not an option for pfSense @jimp?

                  Unlike CARP, VRRP relies on broadcast with one single vMAC instead of multicast MAC addresses. The big advantage of VRRP is, that it does NOT require promiscuous mode on virtual environments like VMWare vSphere to be enabled, which otherwise imposes a security-risk in any business-critical environment.

                  Although it's currently unmaintained, there even is a port for freevrrpd available already: https://www.freshports.org/net/freevrrpd

                  Thanks

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • jimpJ
                    jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                    last edited by

                    No, we have not attempted to utilize that.

                    Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                    Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                    Do not Chat/PM for help!

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • S
                      snunez
                      last edited by snunez

                      Since CARP does not work on cloud virtual environments (AWS, Google, Oracle cloud, etc), is there any other way to make pfSense work in HA configuration for cloud environments?
                      If not, is there any plan to make HA cloud configuration to work in the near future?

                      E 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • E
                        ErsanY @snunez
                        last edited by

                        Hi. Is there any update on this matter please? Meaning, CARP support or alternative for pfsense usage on Public Clouds (AWS, GCP, Azure etc) ?

                        M jimpJ 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • M
                          michmoor LAYER 8 Rebel Alliance @ErsanY
                          last edited by

                          @ErsanY Thanks for making this post active again. CARP is very limiting with deployments due to the IP addressing requirement.

                          Firewall: NetGate,Palo Alto-VM,Juniper SRX
                          Routing: Juniper, Arista, Cisco
                          Switching: Juniper, Arista, Cisco
                          Wireless: Unifi, Aruba IAP
                          JNCIP,CCNP Enterprise

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • jimpJ
                            jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate @ErsanY
                            last edited by

                            @ErsanY said in CARP alternative:

                            Hi. Is there any update on this matter please? Meaning, CARP support or alternative for pfsense usage on Public Clouds (AWS, GCP, Azure etc) ?

                            https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/solutions/aws-vpn-appliance/ha.html

                            Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                            Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                            Do not Chat/PM for help!

                            M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • M
                              michmoor LAYER 8 Rebel Alliance @jimp
                              last edited by

                              @jimp What about on prem? Is CARP alternative still being investigated?

                              Firewall: NetGate,Palo Alto-VM,Juniper SRX
                              Routing: Juniper, Arista, Cisco
                              Switching: Juniper, Arista, Cisco
                              Wireless: Unifi, Aruba IAP
                              JNCIP,CCNP Enterprise

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • jimpJ
                                jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                                last edited by

                                The only possible alternative would be VRRP which has the same limitations as CARP, which is already covered higher in the thread.

                                Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                                Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                                Do not Chat/PM for help!

                                M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • S
                                  snunez
                                  last edited by

                                  I've been using pfSense in HA using UCARP in Oracle Cloud.
                                  Oracle Cloud has L2 VLAN that allows broadcast (but not multicast) messages. Therefore, CARP doesn't work, but UCARP works well because it can be configured to use broadcast messages instead of multicast.
                                  It would be great if pfSense incorporated UCARP as an alternative for HA so that it could be used in cloud installations.
                                  Do you think this is possible?

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • jimpJ
                                    jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                                    last edited by

                                    pfSense Plus has unicast CARP already.

                                    https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/firewall/virtual-ip-addresses.html#vip-configuration-options

                                    Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                                    Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                                    Do not Chat/PM for help!

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • M
                                      michmoor LAYER 8 Rebel Alliance @jimp
                                      last edited by

                                      @jimp said in CARP alternative:

                                      The only possible alternative would be VRRP which has the same limitations as CARP, which is already covered higher in the thread.

                                      Well not having a mandatory /29 would be helpful which would be the main and important differentiator hence vrrp is desired

                                      Firewall: NetGate,Palo Alto-VM,Juniper SRX
                                      Routing: Juniper, Arista, Cisco
                                      Switching: Juniper, Arista, Cisco
                                      Wireless: Unifi, Aruba IAP
                                      JNCIP,CCNP Enterprise

                                      S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • S
                                        SteveITS Galactic Empire @michmoor
                                        last edited by

                                        @michmoor I realize I’m coming in at the end of a 9 year old thread, but technically a /29 isn’t required for WAN. It can be done with private IPs in the right situation, e.g. Comcast business Internet provides both NAT (10.1.10.x) and passthrough/static routing at the same time. Or the docs mention leaving router2 not able to connect out without failover, using one IP, though that’s not ideal.

                                        Pre-2.7.2/23.09: Only install packages for your version, or risk breaking it. Select your branch in System/Update/Update Settings.
                                        When upgrading, allow 10-15 minutes to restart, or more depending on packages and device speed.
                                        Upvote 👍 helpful posts!

                                        M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • M
                                          michmoor LAYER 8 Rebel Alliance @SteveITS
                                          last edited by

                                          @SteveITS said in CARP alternative:

                                          technically a /29 isn’t required for WAN.

                                          For High Availability, i believe it is. CARP isn't ideal.

                                          Firewall: NetGate,Palo Alto-VM,Juniper SRX
                                          Routing: Juniper, Arista, Cisco
                                          Switching: Juniper, Arista, Cisco
                                          Wireless: Unifi, Aruba IAP
                                          JNCIP,CCNP Enterprise

                                          S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • jimpJ
                                            jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                                            last edited by

                                            You can use a single address for CARP on any interface, but it's primarily practical on LANs. If you do that on all of the WANs, the secondary will have no upstream connectivity so it can't operate effectively. If the upstream router allows public and private addresses some of those limitations might be alleviated but it's something you'd have to try on a case-by-case basis.

                                            It's covered in the docs:

                                            https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/highavailability/index.html#ip-address-requirements-for-carp (second paragraph in that section)

                                            Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                                            Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                                            Do not Chat/PM for help!

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.