• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
Netgate Discussion Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

$50 for tftp-server-name DHCP option

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Completed Bounties
31 Posts 14 Posters 47.4k Views
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • E
    eric
    last edited by Jul 19, 2006, 9:11 PM

    I agree with the last two posts  :)

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • D
      databeestje
      last edited by Aug 11, 2006, 1:31 PM

      Weird thought, make it available as a advanced option and hide it behind a advanced button.

      That appears to work really well for current code in RELENG_1

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • D
        dave99
        last edited by Mar 14, 2007, 4:45 PM

        Was there ever a final resolution on this? If so, what is the proper format for the config.xml & services.inc file. I tried all the variations I could find, none seemed to work with my cisco phones.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • D
          databeestje
          last edited by Mar 15, 2007, 8:34 PM

          I would like to claim the bounty.

          It's added to both RELENG_1 and HEAD.

          It should be on the services_dhcp.php page.

          It will be hidden behind a "advanced" button.
          seth.mos@xs4all.nl for paypal

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • B
            Berg
            last edited by Jun 6, 2007, 8:53 PM

            Hello,

            I just completed a search for "option 66" to see if PFSense supported it and came upon this post.

            I too would use this for an Asterisk system.

            What is the status of this initiative ? Is anyone else looking for this ? Is anyone using this now ?

            TIA.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • B
              ben.suffolk
              last edited by Jun 7, 2007, 8:13 AM

              @sullrich:

              This has been commited to -HEAD.

              I'm still a little unsure of your release processes, when will a commit to HEAD (from May 2006) make it into a snapshot, or an actual release?

              I had a look in the code from 1.2-BETA-1-TESTING-SNAPSHOT-06-04-2007 but its not in there.

              Regards

              Ben

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • D
                dotdash
                last edited by Jun 7, 2007, 3:25 PM

                AFAIK, there is no set schedule for HEAD features getting into release.
                However, it should have hit RELENG_1. Perhaps no one ponied up the bounty…
                @databeestje:

                I would like to claim the bounty.

                It's added to both RELENG_1 and HEAD.

                It should be on the services_dhcp.php page.

                It will be hidden behind a "advanced" button.
                seth.mos@xs4all.nl for paypal

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • B
                  ben.suffolk
                  last edited by Jun 7, 2007, 4:25 PM

                  @dotdash:

                  AFAIK, there is no set schedule for HEAD features getting into release.
                  However, it should have hit RELENG_1. Perhaps no one ponied up the bounty…

                  That bit by databeestje confused me a bit because the bounty had already been claimed previously :

                  @cayblood:

                  This bounty has been claimed by Daniel S. Haischt, who sent us some patched files, from which we were able to create a modification with a more minimal impact.

                  Regards

                  Ben

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • D
                    dotdash
                    last edited by Jun 7, 2007, 5:14 PM

                    My understanding was that DSH was no longer coding for the project. See here:
                    http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,2824.msg22987.html#msg22987
                    I think that's why Seth was completing the work.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • D
                      DanielSHaischt
                      last edited by Jun 8, 2007, 10:22 AM

                      @dotdash:

                      My understanding was that DSH was no longer coding for the project. See here:
                      http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,2824.msg22987.html#msg22987
                      I think that's why Seth was completing the work.

                      @dotdash
                      Don't spread false rumors. And yes the bounty was already claimed and I am not sure whether the bounty author is willing to pay twice.

                      Cheers
                      Daniel S. Haischt

                      Mit freundlichen Gruessen / With kind regards
                      DAn.I.El S. Haischt

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • D
                        dotdash
                        last edited by Jun 8, 2007, 3:00 PM

                        Sorry, meant no offense. Was just trying to figure out where this went, as the thread is a bit confusing. It says it was added to release, but doesn't appear in recent snapshots. I was just speculating as to why it looked like there had been multiple people working on this. Again, sorry that my wild speculation was off-base.
                        Re-reading it does say clearly that the bounty was claimed and the changes were added to head.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.
                          This community forum collects and processes your personal information.
                          consent.not_received