$50 for tftp-server-name DHCP option
-
I agree with the last two posts :)
-
Weird thought, make it available as a advanced option and hide it behind a advanced button.
That appears to work really well for current code in RELENG_1
-
Was there ever a final resolution on this? If so, what is the proper format for the config.xml & services.inc file. I tried all the variations I could find, none seemed to work with my cisco phones.
-
I would like to claim the bounty.
It's added to both RELENG_1 and HEAD.
It should be on the services_dhcp.php page.
It will be hidden behind a "advanced" button.
seth.mos@xs4all.nl for paypal -
Hello,
I just completed a search for "option 66" to see if PFSense supported it and came upon this post.
I too would use this for an Asterisk system.
What is the status of this initiative ? Is anyone else looking for this ? Is anyone using this now ?
TIA.
-
This has been commited to -HEAD.
I'm still a little unsure of your release processes, when will a commit to HEAD (from May 2006) make it into a snapshot, or an actual release?
I had a look in the code from 1.2-BETA-1-TESTING-SNAPSHOT-06-04-2007 but its not in there.
Regards
Ben
-
AFAIK, there is no set schedule for HEAD features getting into release.
However, it should have hit RELENG_1. Perhaps no one ponied up the bounty…
@databeestje:I would like to claim the bounty.
It's added to both RELENG_1 and HEAD.
It should be on the services_dhcp.php page.
It will be hidden behind a "advanced" button.
seth.mos@xs4all.nl for paypal -
AFAIK, there is no set schedule for HEAD features getting into release.
However, it should have hit RELENG_1. Perhaps no one ponied up the bounty…That bit by databeestje confused me a bit because the bounty had already been claimed previously :
This bounty has been claimed by Daniel S. Haischt, who sent us some patched files, from which we were able to create a modification with a more minimal impact.
Regards
Ben
-
My understanding was that DSH was no longer coding for the project. See here:
http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,2824.msg22987.html#msg22987
I think that's why Seth was completing the work. -
My understanding was that DSH was no longer coding for the project. See here:
http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,2824.msg22987.html#msg22987
I think that's why Seth was completing the work.@dotdash
Don't spread false rumors. And yes the bounty was already claimed and I am not sure whether the bounty author is willing to pay twice.Cheers
Daniel S. Haischt -
Sorry, meant no offense. Was just trying to figure out where this went, as the thread is a bit confusing. It says it was added to release, but doesn't appear in recent snapshots. I was just speculating as to why it looked like there had been multiple people working on this. Again, sorry that my wild speculation was off-base.
Re-reading it does say clearly that the bounty was claimed and the changes were added to head.
