Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Prefix delegation to second router.

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved 2.4 Development Snapshots
    32 Posts 4 Posters 7.2k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • ?
      Guest
      last edited by

      Ah, I think I see the error of my ways.

      I'll confirm that shortly.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • ?
        Guest
        last edited by

        Indeed yes… Thank you Derelict. Simple error on my part.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • ?
          Guest
          last edited by

          Care to share your settings in the GUI ?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • ?
            Guest
            last edited by

            What for IPv6? or are you still trying to get v4 to work arse backwards? :P

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • ?
              Guest
              last edited by

              IPv6

              I realised after your tutoring that my IPv4 looback idea would just stupid :-)

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • ?
                Guest
                last edited by

                Not too difficult though. You could  forward  port 80 on the Wan of the  second router to the lan address of the 2nd router, you'll need to create the relevent rules.

                Why you would want to do it is what i am unsure about.

                I can think of a more secure way of doing it though. Port forward 'x' port on the primary to 'x' port on the secondary and have openvpn listen on that 'x' port on the secondary, then you'll have a vpn to the secondary LAN side and can do whatever you like.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • E
                  Elv
                  last edited by

                  @marjohh:

                  I can manually add a gateway and route to the primary router, then it works, is that the norm or am I completely wide of the mark?

                  edit:

                  Think I am getting my head around this. dhcp6c puts a /64 prefix on the LAN, which means that in my case, with a /56 prefix the last eight bits of the prefix on my LAN are always going to be 0. Any /64 prefix delegation on my LAN will be be using those eight bits, thus giving my my 256 sub nets.

                  I have exact the same problem. Data going through WAN into internet and answers are received on WAN and not forwarding to LAN. Can you explain the gateway and route you have added in detail, please?

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • DerelictD
                    Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
                    last edited by

                    OK. The first image here is from my edge. That firewall has the HE.NET tunnel configured.

                    One of the interfaces on it is XENWAN which goes to the virtual infrastructure. That network is the WAN interface for the test boxes (172.25.228.0/24 in the diagram in the sig.)

                    There is also dual stack STATICALLY CONFIGURED to a downstream router (::11). That is the CARP VIP of an HA cluster.

                    To that router I route two /56 prefixes. One is 2001:470:XXXX:7d00::/56 the other is 2001:470:XXXX:7e00::/56 .

                    I use 2001:470:XXXX:7d00::/56 to break into /64s to STATICALLY assign to the inside interfaces on the downstream test router. On LAN I also defined a range for the DHCPv6 server there.  In that DHCP server I also used 2001:470:XXXX:7e00::/56 for /60 prefix delegations. Second image.

                    DHCPv6 clients that connect to that LAN get an address from the DHCPv6 server and a /60 automatically routed to them if they request one.

                    Note that all of the interfaces need to pass all of the necessary routed subnets, etc.

                    ![Screen Shot 2018-01-31 at 11.06.26 AM.png](/public/imported_attachments/1/Screen Shot 2018-01-31 at 11.06.26 AM.png)
                    ![Screen Shot 2018-01-31 at 11.06.26 AM.png_thumb](/public/imported_attachments/1/Screen Shot 2018-01-31 at 11.06.26 AM.png_thumb)
                    ![Screen Shot 2018-01-31 at 11.01.24 AM.png](/public/imported_attachments/1/Screen Shot 2018-01-31 at 11.01.24 AM.png)
                    ![Screen Shot 2018-01-31 at 11.01.24 AM.png_thumb](/public/imported_attachments/1/Screen Shot 2018-01-31 at 11.01.24 AM.png_thumb)

                    Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
                    A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
                    DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
                    Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • E
                      Elv
                      last edited by

                      Thanks for answer. The solution seems to be switch from TRACKED LAN by WAN and RA (which I using, because IPv6 changing on reconnect even IPv4 changed) to STATICALLY LAN and DHCPV6-Server?

                      Additionally I have to use a cable modem to connect to ISP, which is a Fritzbox 6490 Cable. That has its own limitation and can only delegate a 62 network. Other requests failed. Getting prefix through IPv4 does not work, too.

                      May be there is no solution using IPv6 subnets on this configuration?

                      ISP: Got rotating IPv4 and IPv6/56 after some reconnects

                      Connection: FritzBox 6490 Cable

                      pfSense WAN: Static IPv4 / DHCP6 / Request only an IPv6 prefix / DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation size: 62 (no other works) / Send IPv6 prefix hint / Reserved Networks: Both checkboxes off

                      pfSense LAN: Static IPv4 / Track Interface (IPv6) / IPv6 Interface: WAN / IPv6 Interface ID: 0 (1,2,3)

                      DHCPv6 Server & RA - LANRouter Advertisements: Unmanaged or Assisted or Stateless working, but wit same results

                      All other reseted to default!

                      LAN-Client -> pfSense LAN -> pfSense WAN -> Fritzbox -> Network request: OK
                      Network replay -> Fritzbox -> pfSense WAN … ends here and nothing revives on pfSense LAN!

                      2.4.2-RELEASE-p1 and it the same problem 'marjohh' has described on page 1! He seems to be a solution in this scenario by adding a route manually.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • DerelictD
                        Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
                        last edited by

                        Why the hell would you need to delegate prefixes to the inside if all you have is dynamic in the first place?

                        Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
                        A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
                        DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
                        Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • E
                          Elv
                          last edited by

                          pfSense cannot handle it? Ok …

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • DerelictD
                            Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
                            last edited by

                            Good luck.

                            Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
                            A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
                            DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
                            Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.