Blocking Port 25 Except from Filtering Service
-
It looks like you've got those rules in reverse order. You can't pass a specific address after you've blocked all. Rules work on a first match basis and you match block all first, which means the desired source never gets to the rule that allows it.
-
@KOM:
WAN Address is literally the IP address used by WAN.
The rules are processed top-down first-match, so your pass rule will never fire if the preceding rule blocks *.
That's what I thought so I originally had the Block below the Pass. Since it wasn't working I came and looked and say people posting Block first so I changed it. I have it back now to Pass before Block but it isn't working. If Block is on with "*" then it blocks all port 25 traffic. If Block is on with "WAN Address" it blocks nothing.
It is now:
Protocol Source Port Destination Port Gateway Queue Schedule Description Actions PASS IPv4 TCP/UDP Filt.IP * WAN address 25 (SMTP) * none Allow traffic from Filter BLOCK IPv4 TCP/UDP * * WAN address 25 (SMTP) * none Block Port 25 Traffic not Explicitly Defined Above -
Where does that "Filt.IP" in the pass line come from? When I try to set up a rule, the specific address is listed.
-
Where does that "Filt.IP" in the pass line come from? When I try to set up a rule, the specific address is listed.
It's the actual IP address of the filter. I changed it to protect the innocent. :)
-
So, I changed the Destination to be the internal IP address of the Exchange server and now it appears to be blocking. This is on the WAN tab of the page. Why would I put a LAN address under Destination?
-
As KOM mentioned, that "WAN address" is the firewall. Unless the mail is going to it, you need the LAN address of the Exchange server. You could also have specified the entire network, instead of a specific address.
-
Why would I put a LAN address under Destination?
Because you're forwarding the traffic. That's how a port-forward works. You define the NAT and the firewall rule allows the traffic to flow.
As KOM mentioned, that "WAN address" is suspicious.
I was just about to ask him if this was a forward, and then he is using the wrong target IP.
-
This is one of the gotchas of the PF packet filter. All NAT (inbound RDR or outbound NAT) happens before it hits the packet filter and the packet filter never sees the packets as they were before the address translation, you have to match the packets in your filter rules using the translated addresses after NAT.
-
Ah. I assumed this was before the forward instead of after. That makes things clearer now. Thanks for all the info everyone! Let me try it out and I'll let you know how it turns out.
-
As KOM mentioned, that "WAN address" is the firewall. Unless the mail is going to it, you need the LAN address of the Exchange server. You could also have specified the entire network, instead of a specific address.
So, I can set the destination as "LAN Network"?
-
You can specify the network, but you're probably better off with just the server address. You'd normally specify the network if you want to be able to reach most or all of the computers on the network. I doubt you'd have more than 1 or 2 Exchange servers, so stick with the single address. I was just providing an example of how you could use the destination for filtering.
-
It's all working. Thanks again for everyone's help!!!