Strange routing issue site-site with openvpn (works fine in ipsec though).

  • I have a site-site VPN between the following subnets:


    Long story short: Using either openvpn or ipsec i'm able to ping every machine on either side of the vpn tunnel just fine, however I can only ping from but I cannot access any of its services (ssh/smaba etc) over openvpn. Everything works fine over ipsec. This problem only affects this one host, Every other device is completely accessible via openvpn (in this case everything else is a VM hosted on proxmox host

    I have no firewall rules blocking access to, I only have an allow all ipv4 rule on both sides for now.

    Details: is a proxmox host, pfsense is virtualized on this host with access to the vmbr0 (WAN) and vmbr1 (internal vm LAN) interfaces.

    ifconfig from

    auto lo
    iface lo inet loopback
    iface eth0 inet manual
    auto vmbr0
    iface vmbr0 inet static
            bridge_ports eth0
            bridge_stp off
            bridge_fd 0
    auto vmbr1
    iface vmbr1 inet static
            bridge_ports none
            bridge_stp off
            bridge_fd 0
            post-up ip route add dev vmbr1 src table rt2
            post-up ip route add default via dev vmbr1 table rt2
            post-up ip rule add from table rt2
            post-up ip rule add to table rt2

    Without the additional route rules for the vmbr1 interface none of the VM's hosted on were able to access services on (ping worked though). At first I suspected this may have something to do with my problem, but if it does how come ipsec is unaffected?

    traceroute from to

    traceroute to (, 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
     1 (  0.770 ms  0.824 ms  0.913 ms

    It doesn't seem to be taking the correct route, and I figure I need another static route back to pfsense at but if I do, again, why does it work fine in ipsec without one? Unfortunately i'm out of my depth, i'm not sure how to add an additional default route, if it's even needed. Thanks for any help with my crazy problems!

Log in to reply