(solved) Nessus vulnerability false positives

MaxBishop · Feb 9, 2018, 11:43 PM

I am running version 2.4.2-RELEASE-p1 (amd64)

A Nessus scan shows several false positives identified as: pfSense < 2.1.1 Multiple Vulnerabilities

It reports my installed version as: unknown..0

My question is: is the current version of pfSense hiding its version?

johnpoz · Feb 8, 2018, 1:49 AM

How exactly are you scanning - from public wan side or lan side? do you have ports open on the wan? What exactly are you scanning with, what version of Nessue/Tenable?

MaxBishop · Feb 8, 2018, 3:27 PM

Hi,

I'm scanning from the LAN side with:
Nessus 7.0.1 (#108) LINUX
Updated: February 7 at 12:15 PM
Plugin set: 201802071215

The scan identifies 4 Critical, 5 High, and 9 Medium level vulnerabilities.


CRITICAL	10.0		106488	pfSense < 2.1.1 Multiple Vulnerabilities (SA-14_02 - SA-14_03)
CRITICAL	10.0		106490	pfSense SA-14_08 / pfSense SA-14_09 / pfSense SA-14_10 / pfSense SA-14_11 / SA-14-12	SA-14-12 : Multiple Vulnerabilities
CRITICAL	10.0		106491	pfSense < 2.1.5 Multiple Vulnerabilities (SA-14_15 - SA-14_17)
CRITICAL	0.0		106499	pfSense SA-16_01 / SA-16-02 : Multiple Vulnerabilities
HIGH		9.0		106501	pfSense < 2.3.1-p1 Multiple Vulnerabilities (SA-16_05)
HIGH		9.0		106502	pfSense < 2.3.1-p5 Multiple Vulnerabilities (SA-16_07 - SA-16_08)
HIGH		9.0		106503	pfSense < 2.3.3 Multiple Vulnerabilities (SA-17_01 - SA-17_03)
HIGH		7.8		106489	pfSense < 2.1.3 Remote Denial of Service Vulnerability (SA-14_05)
HIGH		7.5		106498	pfSense SA-15_10 / SA-15-11 : Multiple Vulnerabilities
MEDIUM		6.8		106493	pfSense < 2.2.1 Multiple Vulnerabilities (SA-15_02 - SA-15_04)
MEDIUM		4.3		106492	pfSense < 2.2 Multiple Vulnerabilities (SA-15_01)
MEDIUM		4.3		106494	pfSense < 2.2.2 Multiple Vulnerabilities (SA-15_05)
MEDIUM		4.3		106495	pfSense < 2.2.3 Multiple Vulnerabilities (SA-15_07)
MEDIUM		4.3		106496	pfSense < 2.2.4 Multiple Vulnerabilities (SA-15_07)
MEDIUM		4.3		106497	pfSense < 2.2.5 Multiple Vulnerabilities (SA-15_08)
MEDIUM		4.3		106500	pfSense SA-16_03 / SA-16-04 : Multiple Vulnerabilities
MEDIUM		4.3		106504	pfSense < 2.3.4 DHCP Lease Display XSS (SA-17_04)
MEDIUM		4.3		106505	pfSense < 2.3.4-p1 Multiple Vulnerabilities (SA-17_05 - SA-17_06)

I can provide a more detailed report, but again, all of these are based on the reported pfSense version number (unknown..0).

johnpoz · Feb 8, 2018, 3:34 PM

Well clearly something is not right if your running 2.4.2p1 and all those issues are related to running pfense below looks like 2.3.4p1

I will have to fire up nessus and do a scan, just haven't played with it in a bit - will fire up that VM…

MaxBishop · Feb 8, 2018, 3:41 PM

Hi,
Thanks,
Let me know if you need any other information.
Meanwhile, I'll check it out in my VM prototype network too.

johnpoz · Feb 8, 2018, 3:53 PM

Just installed 7.0.1 plugins are compiling should be able to scan here shortly.

MaxBishop · Feb 8, 2018, 4:13 PM

Hi,

My virtual network gives me the same results.

johnpoz · Feb 8, 2018, 4:26 PM

Its still working on the plugins - as soon as it finishes.. If I can duplicate the problem then we can look into why and raise it to either nessus or pfsense… I know for sure I am running 2.4.2p1... I would assume ;) you know what version your running.. I take it your running one on hardware and other on some vms. I also have a pfsense vm I can scan.. Currently using sg4860 which is what I will scan first as soon as the plugins finish...

MaxBishop · Feb 8, 2018, 4:36 PM

Correct: 2.4.2-RELEASE-p1 (in both VM and native network)

My VM network is an isolated system with its own pfsense router.

johnpoz · Feb 8, 2018, 4:38 PM

My guess is whatever they are doing to detect version is flawed in someway… Normally you can actually look at the source of the script they use for that specific detection and the output... Will know more and be able get more details once I can get my system showing the same thing or maybe not.. Its about ready I hope ;)

They are not actually check for the issue, they are just reporting known issues with version its detecting which seems to be under 2.1.1?

johnpoz · Feb 8, 2018, 5:25 PM

Ok not seeing what your seeing… Pretty sure picked the firewall plugins... But let me double check and run another scan... All hits I understand or am OK with. The only one going to look into is the ssl 2 and 3.. No use for those on the webgui - but then again only can hit that from my trusted network so not really an issue. And can sure setup nessus to trust my cert signed by my CA..

What exact scan did you do so I can duplicate what you did.. I just picked the basic network scan and thought I had selected the firewalls plugin which includes the pfsense web gui stuff... But will double check that.

johnpoz · Feb 8, 2018, 6:24 PM

Yeah your going to have to give exact details of your scan… I can not seem to get it to show those issues.

Information about this scan :

Nessus version : 7.0.1
Plugin feed version : 201802080515
Scanner edition used : Nessus
Scan type : Normal
Scan policy used : Basic Network Scan
Scanner IP : 192.168.9.211
Port scanner(s) : snmp_scanner
Port range : default
Thorough tests : no
Experimental tests : no
Paranoia level : 1
Report verbosity : 1
Safe checks : yes
Optimize the test : yes
Credentialed checks : no
Patch management checks : None
CGI scanning : enabled
Web application tests : enabled
Web app tests - Test mode : single
Web app tests - Try all HTTP methods : no
Web app tests - Maximum run time : 5 minutes.
Web app tests - Stop at first flaw : CGI
Max hosts : 30
Max checks : 5
Recv timeout : 5
Backports : Detected
Allow post-scan editing: Yes
Scan Start Date : 2018/2/8 11:55 CST
Scan duration : 699 sec

less...

MaxBishop · Feb 8, 2018, 7:19 PM

Hi,

Advanced Scan:
Discovery
General: Test the Local Nessus host
Ping Methods: ARP, TCP=built-in, ICMP(max=2)
Port Scanning:
Local Port Enumerators: SSH, WMI, SNMP, [only run if local failed]
Network Scanners: SYN
Service Discovery
General: Probe all ports
Search for SSL/TLS ciphers - enumerate all
Assessment
General: default
Brute Force: Only use credentials provided
Web Applications: Scan web applications: ON

The last item may be of interest.

Meanwhile, I'll try the scan without the Web Applications scan. Then I'll try it with a "reset to factory" in the VM.

johnpoz · Feb 8, 2018, 7:17 PM

thanks

You mean host discovery.. There are options under advanced for discovery..

Yeah that doesn't do much of anything… Please walk me through what your doing on the newscan screen.. What you pick what you change in settings, etc.

MaxBishop · Feb 8, 2018, 7:20 PM

I edited that last post. (Sorry, I hit post before I was done.)

johnpoz · Feb 8, 2018, 7:33 PM

Yeah scan is running now..

Yeah Not seeing anything like what your seeing… Did your exact scan settings. See my previous post of what it finds for warnings.

You running like proxy or pfblocker or something? The finding of ssl 2 and 3 is because of the ntopng interface on 3000, not the pfsense gui in my findings.

Here attached scan using your walk through of what you changed... Not anything like what your seeing.. You must of brokensomething or had a failed update or something??

MaxBishop · Feb 8, 2018, 7:52 PM

Hi,

I did have pfBlocker and Suricata installed. Here's what I'm going to do:

Uninstall pfBlocker and Suricata and rerun

If that fails, I'll create a fresh install and try it.

MaxBishop · Feb 8, 2018, 8:38 PM

OK,

On my Advanced scan I have a plugin tab that shows the CGI abuses plugin as enabled (image attached)

On a from-scratch install, running the scan shows the same set of critical/high/medium vulnerabilities.

However, running the scan with the CGI abusus plugin disabled removes the detections.

Do you have this plugin enabled?

johnpoz · Feb 8, 2018, 8:55 PM

All plugins enabled… Yes went through and made sure my settings were exactly how you stated your settings are... Can post screenshots if you want.

Seems I even have 1 more plugin than you under that 3785, you list 3784..

My plugins dated

Plugins
Last Updated
Today at 5:15 AM
Expiration
February 06, 2023
Plugin Set
201802080515

Seems your plugins are from yesterday? "201802071215" - you could update them..

edit: Where exactly did you find this? "reported pfSense version number (unknown..0)."

MaxBishop · Feb 8, 2018, 9:20 PM

Below I have the details of one example where the pfSense version shows as unknown. All of the vulnerabilities are in the CGI abuses category and all appear to occur because the version could not be determined by Nessus.

I have also included a screenshot of my pfSense dashboard (this is the from-scratch install)..

I am re-running the scan after a complete Nessus update.