Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    HOWTO: Xbox 360 Live connection with pfSense (Port Forward & UPnP)

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Gaming
    25 Posts 16 Posters 109.3k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • S
      Sikh
      last edited by

      @databeestje:

      with upnp enabled the xbox will request a port forward and succeed. It works fine for my xbox 360 at home. I don't get NAT type strict.

      The missing multicast traffic rule prevented the xbox 360 from succeeding to add a port forward mapping.

      So has this missing multicast traffic rule been put into play?

      I completely erased everything to do with port forwarding, rules etc. First 360 went open, next one had no connection.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • D
        databeestje
        last edited by

        Aha, multiple 360's. That explains, I think it overwrites the existing rules.

        I don't think Microsoft considered the possibility of 2 xboxes on 1 upnp router.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • S
          Sikh
          last edited by

          Not true because when we have multiple xboxs on the network, upnp automatically gives the first one 3074(default xbox live port) and then the rest xbox's get random ports.

          Its Pfsense not being able to handle this.

          DD-WRT does it perfectlly fine so idk

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • AhnHELA
            AhnHEL
            last edited by

            Just as an update, multiple Gaming Consoles do work quite well with pfSense and this tutorial fully explains how to get it up and running.

            What I feel is not stated in enough detail in the tutorial, for any new users to pfSense, is the explanation that Advanced Outbound NAT rules work just like the Firewall rules.  They work top to bottom and match the first rule that applies and ignores the rules below it.  So your LAN rule should always be at the bottom and your specific individual host IP addresses and/or ports should be above the LAN rule.  The diagram shows the proper order but does not explain why.

            Hopefully this additional information will help some users who are running into problems.  Personally, using the UPnP method, I have 2 XBoxes and 2 PS3s on my LAN and they all work with Open NAT, all at the same time with zero issues.

            AhnHEL (Angel)

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • T
              trendchiller
              last edited by

              regardless of what i do, following the whole steps mentioned here:

              upnp does not seem to allow the packets, you can see the packet answers always to be blocked in the system-logs :-(

              i use 2.0-RC2 (i386) built on Sun May 15 20:43:07 EDT 2011

              now i defined NAT by hand and it works…
              but why not upnp ?

              i used the following upnp rule: allow 1-65535 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/32 1-65535

              anyone any ideas ?

              i even created a pass-rule for the upne ports from lan-network to lan-address as stated in http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,33024.0.html
              but it still does not work, there are simply no mapping in the upnp status...

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • First post
                Last post
              Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.