• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
Netgate Discussion Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

Captive portal's session timeout

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Captive Portal
21 Posts 6 Posters 13.7k Views
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S
    sullrich
    last edited by Jun 18, 2006, 5:37 AM

    We havent changed RELENG_1's captive portal code in quite a while.  That is not it.

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • L
      lir
      last edited by Jun 18, 2006, 6:39 PM

      Sorry but I'm a bit confused.
      Is the 'session-timeout' attribute supported or not?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • S
        sullrich
        last edited by Jun 18, 2006, 6:40 PM

        Session timeout is working fine for me here.  But I am in no way using radius.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • L
          lir
          last edited by Jun 18, 2006, 8:38 PM

          Right.
          When not using radius, it's working fine.

          Question is - what happens when using radius?
          There's a special box to use Session-Timeout attribute received from the radius so why is that not functioning?

          Thanks.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • L
            lir
            last edited by Jun 26, 2006, 3:32 PM

            @sullrich:

            Could be.  I don't know.  Will check it out.

            Any new regarding this issue?

            Thanks.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • S
              sullrich
              last edited by Jun 26, 2006, 3:55 PM

              No.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • B
                buraglio
                last edited by Jun 27, 2006, 4:00 PM

                @sullrich:

                No.

                I've been too busy to test this yet, sorry.  I have a lot of travel in the next few weeks so it may be a little while.

                nb

                https://www.forwardingplane.net/

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • H
                  hoba
                  last edited by Jun 27, 2006, 4:27 PM

                  You might want to test this with m0n0wall and bring this to attention at the m0n0 list if it's the same there. pfSense's captive portal is a nearly exact copy of the m0n0 CP though it's not the version used  in the latest m0n0wall.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • N
                    namezero
                    last edited by Jun 29, 2006, 7:57 AM

                    Looks like m0n0wall's beta 1.23b1 has improvement on that issue:

                    hanges in captive portal (jdegraeve)

                    * fixed a bug in the way we handle authentication mechanisms (potentially allowing double logins and faulty locking)
                        * add support for different MAC address formatting styles
                        * add support for per-user bandwidth limitation (using well-known WISPr RADIUS attributes)
                    http://m0n0.ch/wall/beta.php

                    So if you're really stuck, you might want to take a look at m0n0wall for the mean time.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • S
                      sullrich
                      last edited by Jun 29, 2006, 3:34 PM

                      @namezero:

                      Looks like m0n0wall's beta 1.23b1 has improvement on that issue:

                      hanges in captive portal (jdegraeve)

                      * fixed a bug in the way we handle authentication mechanisms (potentially allowing double logins and faulty locking)
                          * add support for different MAC address formatting styles
                          * add support for per-user bandwidth limitation (using well-known WISPr RADIUS attributes)
                      http://m0n0.ch/wall/beta.php

                      So if you're really stuck, you might want to take a look at m0n0wall for the mean time.

                      We have already backported this code to HEAD but it will not appear in 1.0.  I agree with namezero, if this is such a big issue then please run m0n0wall.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.
                        This community forum collects and processes your personal information.
                        consent.not_received