Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Captive portal's session timeout

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Captive Portal
    21 Posts 6 Posters 13.8k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • S
      sullrich
      last edited by

      We havent changed RELENG_1's captive portal code in quite a while.  That is not it.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • L
        lir
        last edited by

        Sorry but I'm a bit confused.
        Is the 'session-timeout' attribute supported or not?

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • S
          sullrich
          last edited by

          Session timeout is working fine for me here.  But I am in no way using radius.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • L
            lir
            last edited by

            Right.
            When not using radius, it's working fine.

            Question is - what happens when using radius?
            There's a special box to use Session-Timeout attribute received from the radius so why is that not functioning?

            Thanks.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • L
              lir
              last edited by

              @sullrich:

              Could be.  I don't know.  Will check it out.

              Any new regarding this issue?

              Thanks.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • S
                sullrich
                last edited by

                No.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • B
                  buraglio
                  last edited by

                  @sullrich:

                  No.

                  I've been too busy to test this yet, sorry.  I have a lot of travel in the next few weeks so it may be a little while.

                  nb

                  https://www.forwardingplane.net/

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • H
                    hoba
                    last edited by

                    You might want to test this with m0n0wall and bring this to attention at the m0n0 list if it's the same there. pfSense's captive portal is a nearly exact copy of the m0n0 CP though it's not the version used  in the latest m0n0wall.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • N
                      namezero
                      last edited by

                      Looks like m0n0wall's beta 1.23b1 has improvement on that issue:

                      hanges in captive portal (jdegraeve)

                      * fixed a bug in the way we handle authentication mechanisms (potentially allowing double logins and faulty locking)
                          * add support for different MAC address formatting styles
                          * add support for per-user bandwidth limitation (using well-known WISPr RADIUS attributes)
                      http://m0n0.ch/wall/beta.php

                      So if you're really stuck, you might want to take a look at m0n0wall for the mean time.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • S
                        sullrich
                        last edited by

                        @namezero:

                        Looks like m0n0wall's beta 1.23b1 has improvement on that issue:

                        hanges in captive portal (jdegraeve)

                        * fixed a bug in the way we handle authentication mechanisms (potentially allowing double logins and faulty locking)
                            * add support for different MAC address formatting styles
                            * add support for per-user bandwidth limitation (using well-known WISPr RADIUS attributes)
                        http://m0n0.ch/wall/beta.php

                        So if you're really stuck, you might want to take a look at m0n0wall for the mean time.

                        We have already backported this code to HEAD but it will not appear in 1.0.  I agree with namezero, if this is such a big issue then please run m0n0wall.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.