Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Routed IPsec using if_ipsec VTI interfaces

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved 2.4 Development Snapshots
    45 Posts 2 Posters 12.6k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • O
      obrienmd
      last edited by

      Is there a simple way to map a devel release, e.g. 2.4.4.a.20180608.1025 for Factory or 2.4.4.a.20180608.0718 for CE, against a git commit? I don't want to assume it will be build using all commits immediately prior to that (and I don't know which time zones these are based on).

      jimpJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • jimpJ
        jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate @obrienmd
        last edited by

        @obrienmd said in Routed IPsec using if_ipsec VTI interfaces:

        Is there a simple way to map a devel release, e.g. 2.4.4.a.20180608.1025 for Factory or 2.4.4.a.20180608.0718 for CE, against a git commit? I don't want to assume it will be build using all commits immediately prior to that (and I don't know which time zones these are based on).

        Not without loading it up and seeing what's in /etc/version.lastcommit. Servers are using CDT.

        Remember: Upvote with the ๐Ÿ‘ button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

        Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

        Do not Chat/PM for help!

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • jimpJ
          jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
          last edited by

          Static routes should be OK now. I'm not quite sure how it worked before, given the changes I had to make, but it's working now.

          https://github.com/pfsense/pfsense/commit/0aa52fb21a21f58035f2e2fe3b9328a9c175ffb5

          I think that might be most if not all of the functional issues. There are still some anti-foot-shooting measures I need to take like preventing removing an IPsec tunnel or P2 used as a VTI interface.

          Remember: Upvote with the ๐Ÿ‘ button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

          Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

          Do not Chat/PM for help!

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • O
            obrienmd
            last edited by

            On latest devel for factory and CE, everything functionally is looking great. Had to restart *pinger (I forget which one is used these days) for gateways to get out of pending after initial interface bring-up, but packets are all flowing, no weird state issues, very solid :)

            jimpJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • jimpJ
              jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate @obrienmd
              last edited by

              @obrienmd said in Routed IPsec using if_ipsec VTI interfaces:

              On latest devel for factory and CE, everything functionally is looking great. Had to restart *pinger (I forget which one is used these days) for gateways to get out of pending after initial interface bring-up, but packets are all flowing, no weird state issues, very solid :)

              Great! I'll have to check back on the gateways, one of mine is OK and it comes right up, I had disabled gateway monitoring on the other pair because it was interfering with the packet captures I was taking when diagnosing some of the other traffic issues above.

              Remember: Upvote with the ๐Ÿ‘ button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

              Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

              Do not Chat/PM for help!

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • First post
                Last post
              Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.