• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
Netgate Discussion Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

Routed IPsec using if_ipsec VTI interfaces

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved 2.4 Development Snapshots
45 Posts 2 Posters 10.8k Views
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • O
    obrienmd
    last edited by Jun 8, 2018, 8:04 PM

    Is there a simple way to map a devel release, e.g. 2.4.4.a.20180608.1025 for Factory or 2.4.4.a.20180608.0718 for CE, against a git commit? I don't want to assume it will be build using all commits immediately prior to that (and I don't know which time zones these are based on).

    J 1 Reply Last reply Jun 8, 2018, 8:08 PM Reply Quote 0
    • J
      jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate @obrienmd
      last edited by Jun 8, 2018, 8:08 PM

      @obrienmd said in Routed IPsec using if_ipsec VTI interfaces:

      Is there a simple way to map a devel release, e.g. 2.4.4.a.20180608.1025 for Factory or 2.4.4.a.20180608.0718 for CE, against a git commit? I don't want to assume it will be build using all commits immediately prior to that (and I don't know which time zones these are based on).

      Not without loading it up and seeing what's in /etc/version.lastcommit. Servers are using CDT.

      Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

      Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

      Do not Chat/PM for help!

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • J
        jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
        last edited by Jun 8, 2018, 8:10 PM

        Static routes should be OK now. I'm not quite sure how it worked before, given the changes I had to make, but it's working now.

        https://github.com/pfsense/pfsense/commit/0aa52fb21a21f58035f2e2fe3b9328a9c175ffb5

        I think that might be most if not all of the functional issues. There are still some anti-foot-shooting measures I need to take like preventing removing an IPsec tunnel or P2 used as a VTI interface.

        Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

        Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

        Do not Chat/PM for help!

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • O
          obrienmd
          last edited by Jun 10, 2018, 5:14 PM

          On latest devel for factory and CE, everything functionally is looking great. Had to restart *pinger (I forget which one is used these days) for gateways to get out of pending after initial interface bring-up, but packets are all flowing, no weird state issues, very solid :)

          J 1 Reply Last reply Jun 11, 2018, 1:00 PM Reply Quote 0
          • J
            jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate @obrienmd
            last edited by Jun 11, 2018, 1:00 PM

            @obrienmd said in Routed IPsec using if_ipsec VTI interfaces:

            On latest devel for factory and CE, everything functionally is looking great. Had to restart *pinger (I forget which one is used these days) for gateways to get out of pending after initial interface bring-up, but packets are all flowing, no weird state issues, very solid :)

            Great! I'll have to check back on the gateways, one of mine is OK and it comes right up, I had disabled gateway monitoring on the other pair because it was interfering with the packet captures I was taking when diagnosing some of the other traffic issues above.

            Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

            Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

            Do not Chat/PM for help!

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            45 out of 45
            • First post
              45/45
              Last post
            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.
              This community forum collects and processes your personal information.
              consent.not_received