• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
Netgate Discussion Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

NTP Not Working [SOLVED (totally)]

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
42 Posts 9 Posters 42.8k Views
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • B
    beremonavabi @Gertjan
    last edited by beremonavabi Jun 1, 2018, 5:56 PM Jun 1, 2018, 5:48 PM

    @gertjan Thanks for the reply. I don't know if you intended to just provide me with a link to a Google Search for "pfsense ntp", but that's what the URL you used:

    https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b&ei=hX8RW97XCsu7UZCHqdgI&q=pfsense+ntp&oq=pfsense+ntp&gs_l=psy-ab.3..0j0i22i30k1l9.9122.9610.0.9810.3.3.0.0.0.0.107.288.2j1.3.0....0...1c.1.64.psy-ab..0.3.285....0.6QCTW78GVd8
    

    resolves to. Regardless, I've already done searches and come up with nothing useful. Was there a specific article you were trying to point me to?

    SG-4860, pfSense 2.4.5-RELEASE-p1 (amd64)

    G 1 Reply Last reply Jun 4, 2018, 5:40 AM Reply Quote 0
    • J
      johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
      last edited by Jun 1, 2018, 6:33 PM

      Ntp server on pfsense is not going to serve up time to clients if it can not sync time. All the ntp servers your pointing to have 0 for reach.. So no ntp on pfsense is not going to work.

      Looks like you can not reach these servers, even though your resolving them to IP. Maybe your ISP is blocking ntp now?

      Do a simple ntp query to one of the ntp servers in question..

      example

      [2.4.3-RELEASE][root@sg4860.local.lan]/root: ntpdate -q 0.pfsense.pool.ntp.org
      server 108.61.56.35, stratum 2, offset 0.003551, delay 0.05855
      server 50.116.52.97, stratum 2, offset -0.000013, delay 0.05957
      server 69.36.182.57, stratum 2, offset 0.003915, delay 0.05742
      server 141.193.21.6, stratum 2, offset 0.013477, delay 0.09850
      1 Jun 13:32:51 ntpdate[52350]: adjust time server 69.36.182.57 offset 0.003915 sec
      [2.4.3-RELEASE][root@sg4860.local.lan]/root: ntpdate -q pool.ntp.org
      server 192.138.210.214, stratum 2, offset -0.002151, delay 0.06967
      server 45.79.111.114, stratum 2, offset 0.009330, delay 0.09789
      server 74.120.81.219, stratum 3, offset 0.005477, delay 0.06345
      server 34.225.6.20, stratum 2, offset 0.003509, delay 0.05782
      1 Jun 13:33:02 ntpdate[52651]: adjust time server 34.225.6.20 offset 0.003509 sec
      [2.4.3-RELEASE][root@sg4860.local.lan]/root:

      If that is not working then yeah your having an issue talking to the nameservers.

      An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
      If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
      Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
      SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.7.2, 24.11

      B 1 Reply Last reply Jun 1, 2018, 6:50 PM Reply Quote 0
      • B
        beremonavabi @beremonavabi
        last edited by beremonavabi Jun 1, 2018, 7:09 PM Jun 1, 2018, 6:45 PM

        @beremonavabi A few more data points. I can ping the pools just fine. Here's one for 0.pfsense.pool.ntp.org:

        PING 0.pfsense.pool.ntp.org (108.61.73.244): 56 data bytes
        64 bytes from 108.61.73.244: icmp_seq=0 ttl=55 time=71.750 ms
        64 bytes from 108.61.73.244: icmp_seq=1 ttl=55 time=71.785 ms
        64 bytes from 108.61.73.244: icmp_seq=2 ttl=55 time=70.744 ms
        
        --- 0.pfsense.pool.ntp.org ping statistics ---
        3 packets transmitted, 3 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
        round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 70.744/71.426/71.785/0.483 ms
        

        And, here's a tracert:

         1  10.4.0.1  12.457 ms  14.250 ms  11.751 ms
         2  199.241.146.177  13.710 ms  12.849 ms  13.194 ms
         3  199.244.116.37  14.318 ms  14.021 ms  46.231 ms
         4  199.244.116.1  12.544 ms  13.587 ms  14.409 ms
         5  173.205.61.21  16.018 ms  15.139 ms  12.568 ms
         6  213.254.230.154  71.582 ms  69.599 ms  70.534 ms
         7  69.31.34.62  73.353 ms  71.083 ms  72.618 ms
         8  * * *
         9  108.61.93.178  72.594 ms  72.036 ms  71.717 ms
        10  108.61.56.35  71.262 ms  70.703 ms  71.341 ms
        

        DNS Lookup also gives a result:

        DNS Lookup
        Hostname 
        0.pfsense.pool.ntp.org
        Results
        Result	Record type
        50.116.52.97	A
        72.5.72.15	A
        154.16.245.246	A
        45.33.48.4	A
        Timings
        Name server	Query time
        127.0.0.1	0 msec
        

        and, DIG:

        Shell Output - dig 0.pfsense.pool.ntp.org
        ; <<>> DiG 9.11.2-P1 <<>> 0.pfsense.pool.ntp.org
        ;; global options: +cmd
        ;; Got answer:
        ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 26967
        ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 4, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1
        
        ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
        ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096
        ;; QUESTION SECTION:
        ;0.pfsense.pool.ntp.org.		IN	A
        
        ;; ANSWER SECTION:
        0.pfsense.pool.ntp.org.	47	IN	A	192.138.210.214
        0.pfsense.pool.ntp.org.	47	IN	A	108.59.2.24
        0.pfsense.pool.ntp.org.	47	IN	A	45.33.84.208
        0.pfsense.pool.ntp.org.	47	IN	A	96.244.96.19
        
        ;; Query time: 0 msec
        ;; SERVER: 127.0.0.1#53(127.0.0.1)
        ;; WHEN: Fri Jun 01 11:42:48 PDT 2018
        ;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 115
        

        So, it looks like routing-wise, pfSense can handle the traffic to/from these NTP servers. It's just the actual pfSense NTP server that's giving me issues.

        EDIT: I rebooted pfSense again and grabbed the NTP log for just after it started up:

        
        Jun 1 12:05:28	ntpd	47401	Soliciting pool server 69.36.182.57
        Jun 1 12:04:29	ntpd	47401	Soliciting pool server 2001:470:e66b:10::13
        Jun 1 12:04:24	ntpd	47401	Soliciting pool server 216.229.4.69
        Jun 1 12:04:23	ntpd	47401	Soliciting pool server 138.236.128.112
        Jun 1 12:03:22	ntpd	47401	Soliciting pool server 2001:470:5:bf4::14
        Jun 1 12:03:19	ntpd	47401	Soliciting pool server 23.239.26.89
        Jun 1 12:03:17	ntpd	47401	Soliciting pool server 45.76.244.193
        Jun 1 12:02:15	ntpd	47401	Soliciting pool server 2600:1f16:7a3:8a22:a922:8e9c:be3:992a
        Jun 1 12:02:13	ntpd	47401	Soliciting pool server 74.82.59.150
        Jun 1 12:02:13	ntpd	47401	Soliciting pool server 74.207.240.206
        Jun 1 12:01:08	ntpd	47401	Soliciting pool server 2620:6:2000:104::48
        Jun 1 12:01:07	ntpd	47401	Soliciting pool server 96.245.170.99
        Jun 1 12:01:07	ntpd	47401	Soliciting pool server 216.229.0.50
        Jun 1 12:01:06	ntpd	47401	DNS time.nist.gov -> 2610:20:6f96:96::4
        Jun 1 12:01:05	ntpd	47401	0.0.0.0 c016 06 restart
        Jun 1 12:01:05	ntpd	47401	0.0.0.0 c012 02 freq_set kernel -0.581 PPM
        Jun 1 12:01:05	ntpd	47401	0.0.0.0 c01d 0d kern kernel time sync enabled
        Jun 1 12:01:05	ntpd	47401	Listening on routing socket on fd #32 for interface updates
        Jun 1 12:01:05	ntpd	47401	Listen normally on 11 lo0 127.0.0.1:123
        Jun 1 12:01:05	ntpd	47401	Listen normally on 10 lo0 [::1]:123
        Jun 1 12:01:05	ntpd	47401	Listen normally on 9 igb5 192.168.40.1:123
        Jun 1 12:01:05	ntpd	47401	Listen normally on 8 igb5 [fe80::208:a2ff:fe0b:9183%6]:123
        Jun 1 12:01:05	ntpd	47401	Listen normally on 7 igb4 192.168.30.1:123
        Jun 1 12:01:05	ntpd	47401	Listen normally on 6 igb4 [fe80::208:a2ff:fe0b:9182%5]:123
        Jun 1 12:01:05	ntpd	47401	Listen normally on 5 igb3 192.168.20.1:123
        Jun 1 12:01:05	ntpd	47401	Listen normally on 4 igb3 [fe80::208:a2ff:fe0b:9181%4]:123
        Jun 1 12:01:05	ntpd	47401	Listen normally on 3 igb2 192.168.10.1:123
        Jun 1 12:01:05	ntpd	47401	Listen normally on 2 igb2 [fe80::208:a2ff:fe0b:9180%3]:123
        Jun 1 12:01:05	ntpd	47401	Listen normally on 1 igb0 192.168.1.1:123
        Jun 1 12:01:05	ntpd	47401	Listen normally on 0 igb0 [fe80::208:a2ff:fe0b:9184%1]:123
        Jun 1 12:01:05	ntpd	47401	proto: precision = 0.370 usec (-21)
        Jun 1 12:01:05	ntpd	47127	Command line: /usr/local/sbin/ntpd -g -c /var/etc/ntpd.conf -p /var/run/ntpd.pid
        Jun 1 12:01:05	ntpd	47127	ntpd 4.2.8p11@1.3728-o Fri Mar 16 18:58:06 UTC 2018 (1): Starting
        

        Nothing leaps out at me as being wrong (except for it soliciting ipv6 addresses when ipv6 is disabled throughout).

        SG-4860, pfSense 2.4.5-RELEASE-p1 (amd64)

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • B
          beremonavabi @johnpoz
          last edited by Jun 1, 2018, 6:50 PM

          @johnpoz said in NTP Not Working:

          ntpdate -q 0.pfsense.pool.ntp.org

          Thanks, johnpoz. It looks like our posts crossed in the mist. But, here's the result of the ntpdate command you recommended:

          Shell Output - ntpdate -q 0.pfsense.pool.ntp.org
          server 171.66.97.126, stratum 1, offset -3.122794, delay 0.04608
          server 129.250.35.250, stratum 2, offset -3.123750, delay 0.03802
          server 155.94.164.121, stratum 2, offset -3.121402, delay 0.03841
          server 107.161.30.25, stratum 2, offset -3.120848, delay 0.08383
           1 Jun 11:46:57 ntpdate[17654]: step time server 171.66.97.126 offset -3.122794 sec
          

          SG-4860, pfSense 2.4.5-RELEASE-p1 (amd64)

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • C
            cyberzeus
            last edited by Jun 1, 2018, 8:16 PM

            Is pfSense running on a VM inside of a provider network? If so, did you check with them if they are blocking port 123?

            B 1 Reply Last reply Jun 1, 2018, 9:41 PM Reply Quote 0
            • B
              beremonavabi @cyberzeus
              last edited by beremonavabi Jun 10, 2018, 9:34 PM Jun 1, 2018, 9:41 PM

              @cyberzeus No. This is version 2.4.3-Release on my Netgate SG-4860.

              EDIT: I've since updated to 2.4.3-RELEASE-p1 (amd64). As expected, it makes no difference.

              SG-4860, pfSense 2.4.5-RELEASE-p1 (amd64)

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • B
                beremonavabi @beremonavabi
                last edited by beremonavabi Jun 1, 2018, 9:56 PM Jun 1, 2018, 9:45 PM

                @beremonavabi Is there any way to force a time update in pfSense? If I'm reading the result of the ntpdate command correctly, my pfSense box is about 3 seconds off from the NTP server time. Could that be too big and pfSense is just refusing to make the change because of that?

                Looking around, I see the following set of commands to do that:

                sudo service ntp stop
                sudo ntpd -gq
                sudo service ntp start
                

                But, I don't know if sudo is needed with pfSense, if it can be done within the GUI, or if it can be done via the console. I don't even know if those are valid things to do in pfSense.

                EDIT: Looks like running ntpdate without a parameter does the job. I ran "ntpdate 0.pfsense.pool.ntp.org" from a Command Prompt in the GUI and it updated the time. But, nothing else has changed. The NTP server is still not grabbing the times from those internet NTP pools.

                SG-4860, pfSense 2.4.5-RELEASE-p1 (amd64)

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • B
                  beremonavabi @beremonavabi
                  last edited by beremonavabi Jun 1, 2018, 11:42 PM Jun 1, 2018, 10:12 PM

                  @beremonavabi I think I found a solution. The following thread:

                  https://forum.netgate.com/topic/127340/solved-ntpd-on-vlan-sub-interface

                  talks about the same problem on vlans. He mentioned:

                  "In case WAN is not among the list of the interfaces to listen on, NTPD picks the source ip for it’s outgoing ntp traffic as follows:

                  sort the ip addresses where it is configured to listen on (interfaces)
                  select the first one as source address
                  This ip should have outgoing nat configured.
                  As I did not want to have NTPD listen on WAN interface and my vlan sub-interfaces did not have outgoing nat, all ntp traffic leaved the WAN interface with internal ip address as source ip.

                  Solution1: select WAN interface to listen on (access from outside is blocked by default)
                  Solution2: make sure you have outgoing nat for the interface with lowest ip address."

                  I had my WAN un-selected for NTP under Services > NTP. Once I added it, everything started working again. So, something must have changed from when I first configured this (either with the various versions or with my messing around with the settings on my other interfaces).

                  Anyway, is there any security implication for letting the NTP server use the WAN? Anything I need to firewall?

                  SG-4860, pfSense 2.4.5-RELEASE-p1 (amd64)

                  J 1 Reply Last reply Jun 1, 2018, 10:16 PM Reply Quote 1
                  • J
                    jahonix @beremonavabi
                    last edited by jahonix Jun 1, 2018, 10:18 PM Jun 1, 2018, 10:16 PM

                    This post is deleted!
                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • J
                      johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                      last edited by Jun 2, 2018, 9:36 AM

                      You sure do not need to be listening on wan for it to go outbound and talk to the ntp servers.

                      An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                      If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                      Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                      SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.7.2, 24.11

                      B 1 Reply Last reply Jun 2, 2018, 1:56 PM Reply Quote 0
                      • J
                        jahonix
                        last edited by Jun 2, 2018, 1:54 PM

                        Maybe you need to check one of the entries as "Prefer"?

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • B
                          beremonavabi @johnpoz
                          last edited by beremonavabi Jun 3, 2018, 1:22 PM Jun 2, 2018, 1:56 PM

                          @johnpoz said in NTP Not Working [SOLVED]:

                          You sure do not need to be listening on wan for it to go outbound and talk to the ntp servers.

                          Well, that's what I thought when I set it up initially (and it worked that way at the time). But, all I can say is that, at this time (with my current configuration on pfSense 2.4.3-Release), without WAN being selected, the NTP service doesn't work. Merely adding the WAN interface under Services > NTP causes it to immediately start working again.

                          EDIT: Another odd thing is that according to that quote I posted from the other thread, above, the other solution is to have the selected interface with the lowest IP address have outbound NAT configured. Well, for me, that's my LAN interface (192.168.1.0.24). Firewall > NAT > Outbound for that interface looks like:

                          
                          Interface	Source	Source Port	Destination	Destination Port	NAT Address	NAT Port	Static Port	Description	Actions
                          		WAN	192.168.1.0/24	*	*	*	WAN address	*		LAN to WAN
                          

                          So, unless I'm mis-reading that, I do have outbound NAT configured for it. Odd.

                          SG-4860, pfSense 2.4.5-RELEASE-p1 (amd64)

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • K
                            kpa
                            last edited by kpa Jun 2, 2018, 2:07 PM Jun 2, 2018, 2:03 PM

                            It's not as simple as you would think. NTP service uses UDP only and there is only one listening socket for sending out queries and listening for replies on UDP port 123. If you set the service not to listen on your WAN interface that will also cut off the service's ability to send anything out on the WAN interface. Yes I know, DNS (for example) does the right thing and uses a separate socket for sending out the queries with a randomized source port, unfortunately NTP hasn't caught up with the new developments yet.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • J
                              jahonix
                              last edited by Jun 2, 2018, 2:08 PM

                              So you're saying all my setups with NTP servicing all internal networks but WAN don't work? I must have missed something then...

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • K
                                kpa
                                last edited by kpa Jun 2, 2018, 2:31 PM Jun 2, 2018, 2:25 PM

                                Look at your outbound NAT rules. There should be a rule for outbound NAT'ing anything sourced from 127.0.0.0/8. That is the thing that makes your set up still work if you happen to set the service not to listen on the WAN, the service will instead use the localhost 127.0.0.1 address for the traffic and it will be properly NAT'ed.

                                Edit: The service might also select your LAN interface in case WAN is not available and if the LAN interface has a routable IP address it works just fine, also if the LAN IP address is an RFC1918 address you're still good because of the standard outbound NAT.

                                B 1 Reply Last reply Jun 2, 2018, 2:30 PM Reply Quote 0
                                • B
                                  beremonavabi @kpa
                                  last edited by Jun 2, 2018, 2:30 PM

                                  @kpa said in NTP Not Working [SOLVED]:

                                  Look at your outbound NAT rules. There should be a rule for outbound NAT'ing anything sourced from 127.0.0.0/8. That is the thing that makes your set up still work if you happen to set the service not to listen on the WAN, the service will instead use the localhost 127.0.0.1 address for the traffic and it will be properly NAT'ed.

                                  Interface	Source	Source Port	Destination	Destination Port	NAT Address	NAT Port	Static Port	Description	Actions
                                  		WAN	127.0.0.0/8	*	*	*	WAN address	*		Localhost to WAN
                                  

                                  I've got that rule, too. But, without WAN being selected for NTP, it still didn't work.

                                  SG-4860, pfSense 2.4.5-RELEASE-p1 (amd64)

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • J
                                    johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                                    last edited by Jun 2, 2018, 2:46 PM

                                    I do not have wan selected, and ntp works just fine to outside ntp servers.

                                    0_1527950415782_ntpnotlistenwan.png

                                    And yeah your loopback should be outbound nat.. Unless the user turned off automatic outbound nat then yeah loopback would work and or any of other lan side interfaces. If they turned off loopback nat, pretty sure that would break a bunch of stuff.

                                    An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                                    If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                                    Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                                    SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.7.2, 24.11

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • C
                                      cyberzeus
                                      last edited by Jun 2, 2018, 10:15 PM

                                      This post is deleted!
                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • B
                                        beremonavabi
                                        last edited by Jun 2, 2018, 10:19 PM

                                        Just to double-check this (in case my forcing a clock update in my troubleshooting attempts "fixed" this), I unselected WAN from the selection list on Services > NTP and restarted the NTP service. I was right back in the same situation I was when I started this thread:

                                        The NTP Status Dashboard widget has the time, but lists the Sync Source as “No active peers available.”

                                        Under Status > NTP, all the pools show a status of “Pool Placeholder” and non-pools show “Unreach/Pending.” They all have “Stratum” equal to 16 instead of the 1 or 2 they should be, and the “When” fields are all blank (just a dash). All the statistics are 0.
                                        ...
                                        Under Status > System Logs > NTP, all the log entries are nothing but “Soliciting pool server…” messages.

                                        Re-selecting the WAN interface on the list and restarting the NTP service starts everything up properly and everything works again.

                                        When it's not working, I don't see anything in any of the logs (except for the constant "Soliciting pool server" messages in the NTP log) related to this. Anyone have any suggestions on log settings to try to track this down? I'd really prefer not having NTP listening to the WAN interface if at all possible.

                                        SG-4860, pfSense 2.4.5-RELEASE-p1 (amd64)

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • J
                                          jahonix
                                          last edited by Jun 2, 2018, 11:21 PM

                                          So did you check an entry as "Prefer"???

                                          B 1 Reply Last reply Jun 2, 2018, 11:29 PM Reply Quote 0
                                          22 out of 42
                                          • First post
                                            22/42
                                            Last post
                                          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.
                                            This community forum collects and processes your personal information.
                                            consent.not_received