Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    One Voucher Per Device

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Captive Portal
    147 Posts 12 Posters 40.5k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • C
      colleytech @wazim4u
      last edited by

      @wazim4u thanks for the link

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • ?
        A Former User @wazim4u
        last edited by

        @wazim4u

        hi sir! you are using 2.5.0 and this patch (1V1D Patch.zip)? One voucher per device is really working?

        thanks!

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • I
          Iahmad
          last edited by

          @Gertjan is there any chance pfsense management consider this function in official release,???

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • viktor_gV
            viktor_g Netgate
            last edited by

            Please check https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/9432#note-6

            GertjanG 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • GertjanG
              Gertjan @viktor_g
              last edited by

              @viktor_g said in One Voucher Per Device:

              Please check https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/9432#note-6

              @viktor_g 👍
              ( I can see what you are doing ☺ )

              No "help me" PM's please. Use the forum, the community will thank you.
              Edit : and where are the logs ??

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • C
                coldmine @wazim4u
                last edited by coldmine

                @wazim4u Can you tell me how did you manage to make the patch work with 2.5 ,i have tried everything but it simply doesn't work at all.
                I get this in logs
                Aug 2 21:08:59 logportalauth 343 Zone: pp - Voucher login good for 9950 min.: FefhaqG3kux, 44:59:e3:71:1c:49, 10.0.0.11
                Aug 2 21:09:39 logportalauth 343 Zone: pp - Enteringh portal_allow(): , ,
                Aug 2 21:09:39 logportalauth 343 Zone: pp - The SQL array (WHERE ip = '10.0.0.12' OR (username != 'unauthenticated' AND lower(username) = 'fefhaqg3kux')) : Array
                Aug 2 21:09:39 logportalauth 343 (
                Aug 2 21:09:39 logportalauth 343 )
                Aug 2 21:09:39 logportalauth 343 : , ,
                Aug 2 21:09:39 logportalauth 343 Zone: pp - Enteringh portal_allow(): , ,
                Aug 2 21:09:39 logportalauth 343 Zone: pp - The SQL array (WHERE ip = '10.0.0.12' OR (username != 'unauthenticated' AND lower(username) = 'fefhaqg3kux')) : Array
                Aug 2 21:09:39 logportalauth 343 (
                Aug 2 21:09:39 logportalauth 343 )
                Aug 2 21:09:39 logportalauth 343 : , ,
                Aug 2 21:09:39 logportalauth 343 Zone: pp - Voucher login good for 9949 min.: FefhaqG3kux, d0:25:98:85:7e:50, 10.0.0.12

                GertjanG W 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • GertjanG
                  Gertjan @coldmine
                  last edited by

                  @coldmine said in One Voucher Per Device:

                  Aug 2 21:09:39 logportalauth 343 Zone: pp - The SQL array (WHERE ip = '10.0.0.12' OR (username != 'unauthenticated' AND lower(username) = 'fefhaqg3kux')) : Array

                  Where do these lines come from ?
                  You add them ? They look fine, though.
                  Btw : use print_r(...) to dump an array.

                  @coldmine said in One Voucher Per Device:

                  you manage to make the patch work with 2.5

                  The patch is included in 2.5.0. You should run the latest 2.5.0-dev to have it.
                  You are using what version version ?

                  @coldmine said in One Voucher Per Device:

                  Voucher login good for 9949 min.: FefhaqG3kux, d0:25:98:85:7e:50, 10.0.0.12

                  and

                  @coldmine said in One Voucher Per Device:

                  Voucher login good for 9950 min.: FefhaqG3kux, 44:59:e3:71:1c:49, 10.0.0.11

                  = typical voucher re use.

                  The patches states above was just a case study. I thing this issue isn't implemented yet - at least not in 2.4.5-p1. I'm not using 2.5.0....

                  No "help me" PM's please. Use the forum, the community will thank you.
                  Edit : and where are the logs ??

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • W
                    wazim4u @coldmine
                    last edited by

                    @coldmine yes its working since 8 months now without any issue with 2.5-dev. since its working fine i didn't upgrade it

                    Aug 2 21:13:41	logportalauth	64788	Zone: dhabi - The SQL array (WHERE ip = '10.20.29.254' OR (username != 'unauthenticated' AND lower(username) = '1788234364')) : Array
                    Aug 2 21:13:41	logportalauth	64788	Zone: dhabi - Enteringh portal_allow(): , ,
                    Aug 2 21:13:12	logportalauth	278	Zone: dhabi - CONCURRENT VOUCHER LOGIN - NOT ALLOWED KEEPING OLD SESSION : 1788234364, 48:9d:d1:91:95:6b, 10.20.21.156
                    Aug 2 21:13:12	logportalauth	278	Zone: dhabi - Found NOT last: 1788234364, 48:9d:d1:91:95:6b, 10.20.21.156
                    Aug 2 21:13:12	logportalauth	278	Zone: dhabi - config['captiveportal'][dhabi]['noconcurrentlogins'] 2 exists = set: 1788234364, 48:9d:d1:91:95:6b, 10.20.21.156
                    Aug 2 21:13:12	logportalauth	278	Zone: dhabi - Voucher + ! unauthenticated + (cpentry == user): 1788234364, 48:9d:d1:91:95:6b, 10.20.21.156
                    Aug 2 21:13:12	logportalauth	278	Zone: dhabi - config['captiveportal'][dhabi]['noconcurrentlogins'] exists = set: 1788234364, 48:9d:d1:91:95:6b, 10.20.21.156
                    Aug 2 21:13:12	logportalauth	278	Zone: dhabi - Entering for each loop 1788234364 = 1788234364: 1788234364, 48:9d:d1:91:95:6b, 10.20.21.156
                    

                    My pfsense 2.5 version is 2.5.0.a.20191015.0305
                    1000+ concurrent captive portal users.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • GertjanG
                      Gertjan
                      last edited by Gertjan

                      I don't get it .....

                      Your using a 'dev' version that you don't update regularly ??

                      If you want to know what has been added, corrected or modified, there is only one source.
                      Knowing it's open source => https://github.com/pfsense/pfsense/pulls
                      and redmine of course => https://redmine.pfsense.org/projects/pfsense/issues?set_filter=1&tracker_id=1 - on the right side you can filter resolved issues, and outstanding issues.

                      If the Multiple voucher login question has been solved :
                      Plan A : Update.
                      Plan B: consult

                      Btw : Oh, lol : https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/2146

                      No "help me" PM's please. Use the forum, the community will thank you.
                      Edit : and where are the logs ??

                      W 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • W
                        wazim4u @Gertjan
                        last edited by

                        @Gertjan I have two systems both 2.5-dev version . second system is up to date always. I keep an eyes on all updates and bug fixes (redmine) everyday i am testing both system in different ways.

                        second system i didn't apply any patch and people can reuse voucher on other device so they get disconnected from old

                        Aug 3 13:00:03	logportalauth	38072	Zone: campco - CONCURRENT LOGIN - TERMINATING OLD SESSION: 9478394944, 7c:78:7e:4d:1c:43, 10.10.21.188
                        

                        Moving soon to FreeRADIUS base solution which has no issue with concurrent logins. I have already done initial testing in production environment.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • W
                          wazim4u @Iahmad
                          last edited by

                          This post is deleted!
                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.