Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    SG-1100 Running Real VLANs

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Official Netgate® Hardware
    sg-1100switchports
    44 Posts 14 Posters 18.6k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • johnpozJ
      johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
      last edited by johnpoz

      your switch only shows port 1 with tagged vlans on it, where is the port connecting to pfsense?

      Your vlans will have to be tagged on the port going to pfsense, and the port going to AP.

      How is everything connected exactly? What is the point of tagging vlans to your what looks like a sg108e if no other ports are using those vlans, and no other uplink to another device like AP that is tagged?

      An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
      If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
      Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
      SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • P
        pfsmooth
        last edited by

        Thanks John, yes. I figured out that the port pfsense was plugged into needed to be tagged to the same vlan as the port the AP was plugged into. All good there.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • S
          sgw @Derelict
          last edited by

          I fell over this as I restored a backup to a new SG-1100 and seem to have "preserve switch config" active.
          So I kept the underlying VLANs 4090-4092 as intended but my other VLANs from the backup weren't applied, as far as I understand.

          Could someone point me to some information what that column "Members" in the VLAN table means exactly?

          I'd like to understand that and not only blindly fill in "0t,2t" there, thanks !

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • DerelictD
            Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
            last edited by Derelict

            They signify the switch port number and whether or not the VLAN is tagged or untagged there.

            Port 0 is the uplink to the ARM SoC. mvneta0 is the interface name on the SoC. That port should always be tagged. VLAN 200 on 0t will be mvneta0.200 (VLAN 200 on mvneta0).

            An untagged port on the SG-1100 switch also has to have the PVID set to the proper untagged VLAN on the Ports tab.

            The default settings are:

            Name VLAN Ports Untagged Port PVID pfSense Interface
            WAN 4090 0t,3 3 4090 mvneta0.4090
            LAN 4091 0t,2 2 4091 mvneta0.4091
            OPT 4092 0t,1 1 4092 mvneta0.4092

            Some examples here: https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/solutions/sg-1100/switch-overview.html

            Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
            A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
            DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
            Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

            S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • S
              sgw @Derelict
              last edited by

              @Derelict thanks a lot, will look into it asap

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • S
                sbeeche
                last edited by

                In the middle of this topic, Tom from Lawrence technology post a video configuring the vlans on a sg 1100, and is quite different to other models because the Marvell SoC they use in there works like a single port with 3 vlans

                The video is here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bp_B79-WLlU

                I have a 1100 with Dual LAN (FailOver, no load balancing) with 5 vlans working with a TP-Link SG108E and a Unifi Wi-Fi AP with no problem at all, so if you have a question please feel free to ask and let's see if a have an answer

                L W 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 2
                • L
                  lamster @sbeeche
                  last edited by

                  @sbeeche Thanks you. I was able to saw that video and did my initial setup. Appreciate it.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • W
                    webbdog28 @sbeeche
                    last edited by

                    @sbeeche Thank You! This was my missing piece!

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • U
                      usn8283 @pfsmooth
                      last edited by

                      @pfsmooth Just to throw this in there, in case it helps someone else someday having issues with PLEX. I discovered a long time ago that for PLEX to work properly with PfSense you have to add an entry under Services/DNS Resolver/ General Settings > Down at the bottom of the page under custom options enter:

                      server:
                      private-domain: "plex.direct"

                      I am uncertain if PfSense has made any changes that negates this entry, but its worked for me for a long time.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • stephenw10S
                        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                        last edited by

                        If you need that to resolve to a private IP you would still need to add that. Or you could disable DNS rebinding protection globally but adding that one domain is preferable.

                        Steve

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.