Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Squid proxy usefulness ?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Cache/Proxy
    5 Posts 4 Posters 825 Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • chudakC
      chudak
      last edited by

      After configuring squid proxy Play Station Vue, Netflix, Arlo Videos Cameras stopped working.

      So two questions:

      How to address problems with Play Station Vue, Netflix, Arlo Videos Cameras

      Overall wonder about usefulness vs problems it creates.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • KOMK
        KOM
        last edited by

        IMO squid is only useful these days as a base for squidguard URL filtering. If you don't need that then squid will cause more problems than it solves.

        chudakC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • chudakC
          chudak @KOM
          last edited by

          @kom

          Good to know we share similar sentiment.

          I wanted to use it to replace Nginx reverse proxy, but have doubts now.

          Why do you need url filtering if you could use pfBlockerNG ?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • occamsrazorO
            occamsrazor
            last edited by

            Similar experience.... I wanted to use Squid as a caching proxy but after using a few days realised my hit rate for http was in the order of 1-2% of traffic only. I toyed with HTTPS as well, but found it added issues and the additional complications that just weren't worth it for me. Your experience may vary of course....

            pfSense CE on Qotom Q355G4 8GB RAM/60GB SSD
            Ubiquiti Unifi wired and wireless network, APC UPSs
            Mac OSX and IOS devices, QNAP NAS

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • Raffi_R
              Raffi_
              last edited by Raffi_

              Same experience as you guys. Used it for caching and ClamAV. It was a false sense of security at best since it could only scan ~ 1% of traffic. So even if it was a 100% effective AV, it was still mostly useless. No point in adding complexity so I no longer use squid.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • First post
                Last post
              Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.