• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
Netgate Discussion Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

problems with flexible limiters set using floating rules

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Traffic Shaping
29 Posts 5 Posters 3.7k Views
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • D
    Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
    last edited by Sep 28, 2019, 7:49 AM

    If that will solve the problem.

    Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
    A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
    DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
    Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

    A 1 Reply Last reply Sep 28, 2019, 7:55 AM Reply Quote 0
    • A
      AdamL @Derelict
      last edited by Sep 28, 2019, 7:55 AM

      @Derelict I will definitely test this out. Thanks!

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • E
        eriknuds
        last edited by Sep 28, 2019, 3:40 PM

        I now tested with PIE and FQ_PIE, and I tested with limits above what the line can normally do (it's a WISP conection - both are actually...) and it doesn't happen anymore. I have the same firewall rules. Yes I know to reverse the queues for in/out wan rules, and I have the same setup for the other wan rules which worked all the time and I haven't changed the rules now that they work with PIE/FQ_PIE...really weird because yesterday I tried other settings than PIE and codel and none worked...I also did a state reset between the tests, not just making new connections, but it didn't fix the issue yesterday.

        A 1 Reply Last reply Sep 28, 2019, 3:46 PM Reply Quote 0
        • A
          AdamL @eriknuds
          last edited by Sep 28, 2019, 3:46 PM

          @eriknuds And what about flexible limiter? Honestly Qos(queuing) is not so important to me. Flexible limiter is...

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • E
            eriknuds
            last edited by Sep 28, 2019, 3:47 PM

            Yes, it's set up as flixible now with masks on the queues and not the limiter, and it seems to work fine...

            M 1 Reply Last reply Sep 30, 2019, 9:55 AM Reply Quote 0
            • M
              manu77 @eriknuds
              last edited by Sep 30, 2019, 9:55 AM

              @eriknuds
              Hello

              Very interessant . But I don't see exactly your configuration.
              Could you please send us screenshots for :
              1 -Rules in LAN ( list view) and marking options in Rules you chose -> I m curious to see how you say to PF to mark the packet properply with two different possible gateway
              2 - Rules in Floating ( list view) and options in Rule for matching traffic -> I'm also curious to know how you match packet with 'out' direction on this step
              3 - Options chosen at this step bellow

              4a7c96b7-826f-4787-a468-43951d64a030-image.png

              thanks a lot

              E 1 Reply Last reply Sep 30, 2019, 7:34 PM Reply Quote 0
              • E
                eriknuds @manu77
                last edited by eriknuds Sep 30, 2019, 7:36 PM Sep 30, 2019, 7:34 PM

                @manu77

                FW Rules:
                d439db35-9b1d-4963-a5fb-c3d2719161c4-image.png

                The gateway is the gateway group (Loadbalance) in all the rules. To test each wan connection separately I just select another Tier in the gateway group so only one gateway is used.

                I only have the 4 floating match rules related to Limiters/queues. None for the LAN interface.

                5984d182-e2bb-4718-ba9d-49f7c5c76666-image.png

                Not sure if I have done everything right, but it seems to isolate the traffic and not disturb other hosts even though I exhaust the line with speed checking...and the isolation is really all I need. AQM etc is not a requirement. My wan connections are pretty symmetric, though not very high bandwith, WISP connections. But I would really like triple isolation like in CAKE. It really sucks that OpenWRT have had CAKE functionality for so long and pfsense seem to be no closer to getting it.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • M
                  manu77
                  last edited by Oct 1, 2019, 8:09 AM

                  @eriknuds
                  Thanks to take time for showing us your conf. I will test it and tell you .
                  I've a lab here with 6 firewalls to emulate multiwan. so we will see.

                  E 1 Reply Last reply Oct 1, 2019, 2:18 PM Reply Quote 0
                  • E
                    eriknuds @manu77
                    last edited by Oct 1, 2019, 2:18 PM

                    @manu77

                    Great stuff, let me know if you need more details:-)

                    Regards,
                    Erik Knudsen

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • M
                      manu77
                      last edited by Oct 3, 2019, 11:53 AM

                      Hello All,

                      I confirm this configuration works and works well. Each time the gateway changes, the Pipe is well affected too with 10 secondes of floating bandwitdth ( no traffic )
                      Now I must go further to see how to add specific traffic in a specific queue and described from WAN ! because the floating rules for this test are set up as you post , I mean from * to *

                      nice day

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • E
                        eriknuds
                        last edited by Oct 3, 2019, 2:36 PM

                        @manu77 ,

                        I have selected the appropriate wan interface in each rule (in-rule and out-rule for each wan interface) - in the WanIn/Out rules I have selected only the wan interface, and in the corresponding wan2 rules I have selected only the wan2 interface.

                        Good luck with any further testing:-)

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • T tumbleweedcity referenced this topic on Feb 5, 2023, 3:52 PM
                        28 out of 29
                        • First post
                          28/29
                          Last post
                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.
                          This community forum collects and processes your personal information.
                          consent.not_received