Navigation

    Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search

    Routing issues after Upgrade (2.4.4) - No (ICMP) Reply to packets

    Firewalling
    2
    9
    193
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • P
      pf_Thomas last edited by

      Hello,

      its seems i messed up somehow after upgrading to 2.4.4_2.

      Im trying to reach: 10.55.101.21 (LAN Network) from openvpn Network (10.0.8.3)

      Using Diagnostics Ping it works fine from LAN Interface.
      LAN -> LAN 10.55.101.21 -> ok

      Using Diagnostics Ping from OPENVPN Interface
      GCAccessVPN -> LAN 10.55.101.21 -> no

      Rules are set to any/any on both interfaces. Everything is open.

      If I do Packet Capturing: I see the ECHO but no REPLY.

      Any suggestions?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • P
        pf_Thomas last edited by pf_Thomas

        Additional Information, which makes curious.

        LAN Interface rules:
        0_1552297788914_8b5b3eb2-fa95-4350-bf5f-24620facd703-grafik.png

        but are blocked?
        0_1552297693154_c86321c2-f887-4561-b170-03f6b3f18bfe-grafik.png

        In addition to that:
        Only DNS request are send thru the connection:
        0_1552297890857_0d10e89e-c6ce-441b-b22e-f4180aa458d2-grafik.png

        Anyone an Idea, what I have to check?

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • johnpoz
          johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator last edited by johnpoz

          You seem to have asymmetrical routing..

          The devices on your "lan" actually use pfsense as their default gateway?

          You see those SA - tells me psense seeing the Syn,Ack (answer to syn in opening connection) but never saw the syn to open the state.

          Could you draw up this network.

          An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
          If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
          Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
          SG-4860 23.01 | Lab VMs CE 2.6, 2.7

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • P
            pf_Thomas last edited by pf_Thomas

            Like this? - It is virtualized on VMware ESXi 6.5
            0_1552302184167_5914eee0-3f73-4518-93d2-077255265eec-grafik.png

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • johnpoz
              johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator last edited by johnpoz

              Ok that looks pretty sane.

              So all the devices have default gateway as the IP address of pfsense in these /24s

              This is sign of out of state traffic
              0_1552302181643_outofstate.png

              10.55.101.247 sent syn,ack to 10.55.102.41 and to .32 but got blocked because no state would be the reason SA normally blocked.

              Normally means that 101.247 got the syn without it going through pfsense so it could set up the state.. Running multiple L3 networks on the same L2 could do that. Since your saying this is VM, need to see the configuration of your vswitching.. Are you doing port groups. Is pfsense VM as well? Are you letting pfsense handle the tags for the vlans? Etc. etc..

              You say you sniffed and saw the echo request.. Where did you sniff.. If you sniffed on pfsense interface into the network, then pfsense did its job and sent the request, if you don't see a reply - the box either sent it to some other gateway, didn't answer, never got it, etc.

              An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
              If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
              Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
              SG-4860 23.01 | Lab VMs CE 2.6, 2.7

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • P
                pf_Thomas last edited by

                Got you... but I wasn't finish yet :-)

                the FW works with CARP IP (HA). The CARP IP is set a default GW for the clients. Maybe thats the reason for this asymmetrical rounting?
                0_1552302523073_7f347192-39d2-4a4f-8327-5b7af6d81bbc-grafik.png

                Well..
                PING from VPN Client captured on FW
                0_1552302941819_e1c149ac-ce13-4410-ac56-bc8dc1336d7c-grafik.png

                Ping direct FW -> Server
                0_1552303101650_d808e119-931b-4eb7-bb1d-b263615bcd8b-grafik.png

                Ping VPN Interface -> Server
                0_1552303124876_76d2232b-cf7d-4aca-a5b7-35dff6bf4905-grafik.png
                0_1552303147154_945a4e6e-665e-48a0-9f80-862f4b54e335-grafik.png

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • johnpoz
                  johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator last edited by johnpoz

                  Yeah carp could have to do with it for sure..

                  You sure your HA is working correctly.. If you send the syn,ack back or echo reply back to wrong pfsense then yeah you have the same sort of issue.

                  An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                  If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                  Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                  SG-4860 23.01 | Lab VMs CE 2.6, 2.7

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • P
                    pf_Thomas last edited by pf_Thomas

                    Holy shit... it seems to be something bigger...

                    FW1
                    0_1552304373550_c5ba27cd-9a99-4355-90f8-0eeeb9affa6b-grafik.png

                    FW2
                    0_1552304339549_1b2b8ec2-99e9-4712-9e43-ad5d519fa4ba-grafik.png

                    I only saw "The system is on the latest version"....
                    Well now i have to check, why the update didn't work and it doesn't see the missing updates....

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • P
                      pf_Thomas last edited by

                      Ok. HA is back and online... but the initial issue still exists :-(

                      Nothing arrives at .102
                      0_1552309912945_f07ab6d7-d8ce-4f9e-912b-1b502c959599-grafik.png

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • First post
                        Last post