Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    FRR OSPF static routing Virtual IPs

    FRR
    1
    1
    254
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • R
      roadrunner51
      last edited by

      Upfront - I am neither an OSPF nor FRR hero. So everything here can also be caused by basic lack of knowledge. Nevertheless - I am a little puzzled about the behaviour of the FRR package. Maybe anyone can give me a hint how to deal with this.

      I have FRR/OSPF running to manage fail over between sites (OpenVPN tunnels) as described in the Hangout by John Pringle. So far - everything is working really well and doing exactly what it should for interfaces.

      I now wanted to add Virtual IPs to an interface and distribute those via static routes (Zebra) to the neighbours. Now comes the weird thing. When I first tried it, Zebra recognised it as a connected route but did neither select nor forward it.

      By accident, when validating the config, did I mess up the network mask and increased it on the zebra side (27 zebra vs. 28 on the Virtual IP side). And voila - the route was selected and forwarded to the neighbours.

      It can be reproduced. Adjusting the network mask in zebra or Virtual IP kills the routing again.

      That's how I set up the static routing now - having a large mask on zebra side. But this seems awkward to me - especially knowing pfsense for some time now.

      So where is my mistake in setting up this. Is there an order to follow to avoid this behaviour?

      A bit clueless - honestly

      P.S. All nodes running on pfsense 2.4.4-RELEASE-p2

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • First post
        Last post
      Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.