Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    pfSense 2.5 Release Date News

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    84 Posts 24 Posters 39.3k Views 27 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • NollipfSenseN Offline
      NollipfSense
      last edited by

      Just curious as to any estimated release date news, what's the word?

      pfSense+ 23.09 Lenovo Thinkcentre M93P SFF Quadcore i7 dual Raid-ZFS 128GB-SSD 32GB-RAM PCI-Intel i350-t4 NIC, -Intel QAT 8950.
      pfSense+ 23.09 VM-Proxmox, Dell Precision Xeon-W2155 Nvme 500GB-ZFS 128GB-RAM PCIe-Intel i350-t4, Intel QAT-8950, P-cloud.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
      • NollipfSenseN Offline
        NollipfSense
        last edited by

        Thank you members, for up voting...based on the news on Feb.13.2019 that snapshots moving to pfSense 2.5.0 and Mar.18.2019 pfSense 2.5.0 now available, it seems that we should be seeing a release candidate by now.

        As the saying goes, no news is good news; however, the suspense is killing!

        pfSense+ 23.09 Lenovo Thinkcentre M93P SFF Quadcore i7 dual Raid-ZFS 128GB-SSD 32GB-RAM PCI-Intel i350-t4 NIC, -Intel QAT 8950.
        pfSense+ 23.09 VM-Proxmox, Dell Precision Xeon-W2155 Nvme 500GB-ZFS 128GB-RAM PCIe-Intel i350-t4, Intel QAT-8950, P-cloud.

        JKnottJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • KOMK Offline
          KOM
          last edited by

          Unless there is a particular feature you're waiting on that's only in 2.5, I don't see what the hurry is. It will look and run the same as 2.4.4. If you're running in production, you're wise to wait at least a month after release before you upgrade.

          R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • jimpJ Offline
            jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
            last edited by

            It won't be for a while yet. We need to move to a FreeBSD 12.1 base and even after that, there are a number of issues to address. When we know more, we'll post about it.

            Remember: Upvote with the ๐Ÿ‘ button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

            Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

            Do not Chat/PM for help!

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
            • JKnottJ Offline
              JKnott @NollipfSense
              last edited by

              @NollipfSense

              Will it require AES-NI CPU Crypto?

              PfSense running on Qotom mini PC
              i5 CPU, 4 GB memory, 32 GB SSD & 4 Intel Gb Ethernet ports.
              UniFi AC-Lite access point

              I haven't lost my mind. It's around here...somewhere...

              ahking19A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • ahking19A Offline
                ahking19 @JKnott
                last edited by

                @JKnott "AES-NI Not Required
                The original plan was to include a RESTCONF API in pfSense 2.5.0, which for security reasons would have required hardware AES-NI or equivalent support. Plans have since changed, and pfSense 2.5.0 does not contain the planned RESTCONF API, thus pfSense 2.5.0 will not require AES-NI."

                https://www.netgate.com/blog/pfsense-2-5-0-development-snapshots-now-available.html

                JKnottJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • JKnottJ Offline
                  JKnott @ahking19
                  last edited by

                  @ahking19

                  Tnx. I won't have to buy new hardware then.

                  PfSense running on Qotom mini PC
                  i5 CPU, 4 GB memory, 32 GB SSD & 4 Intel Gb Ethernet ports.
                  UniFi AC-Lite access point

                  I haven't lost my mind. It's around here...somewhere...

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • NollipfSenseN Offline
                    NollipfSense
                    last edited by

                    Thank you all for responding. I am one of those who had bought new equipment to meet pfSense 2.5 requirement only to learn that that won't happen; so, I just want the update to be over with. Wondered how to add that Restconf API...it would be pleasant if we could add it as a package so the folks who prepared for it could have a sense of relief.

                    pfSense+ 23.09 Lenovo Thinkcentre M93P SFF Quadcore i7 dual Raid-ZFS 128GB-SSD 32GB-RAM PCI-Intel i350-t4 NIC, -Intel QAT 8950.
                    pfSense+ 23.09 VM-Proxmox, Dell Precision Xeon-W2155 Nvme 500GB-ZFS 128GB-RAM PCIe-Intel i350-t4, Intel QAT-8950, P-cloud.

                    JKnottJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • JKnottJ Offline
                      JKnott @NollipfSense
                      last edited by

                      @NollipfSense said in pfSense 2.5 Release Date News:

                      could have a sense of relief.

                      PfSense of relief! ๐Ÿ˜‰

                      PfSense running on Qotom mini PC
                      i5 CPU, 4 GB memory, 32 GB SSD & 4 Intel Gb Ethernet ports.
                      UniFi AC-Lite access point

                      I haven't lost my mind. It's around here...somewhere...

                      A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
                      • A Offline
                        akuma1x @JKnott
                        last edited by

                        @JKnott said in pfSense 2.5 Release Date News:

                        PfSense of relief! ๐Ÿ˜‰

                        Nice one!

                        Jeff

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • W Offline
                          webdawg
                          last edited by

                          Is the rest API still a target, or is it deadlocked in TNSR???

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • stephenw10S Offline
                            stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                            last edited by

                            Not for 2.5 it isn't. That was what as driving the AES-NI requirement. See:
                            https://www.netgate.com/blog/pfsense-2-5-0-development-snapshots-now-available.html#aes-ni-not-required

                            Steve

                            W 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • W Offline
                              webdawg @stephenw10
                              last edited by

                              @stephenw10 I understand that.

                              I think some better idea of the future of pfSense would be appropriate. As a couple people already mentioned they spent the money to upgrade the equipment, and some of us were happy to do it if it meant an API.

                              Not a huge deal. pfSense is always caught between comments like this, and trying to stay opensource. I do not want to come off as unappreciative, but if I went through all this non-sense for pfSense to pull back, I want to make a mental note why for the future.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • NollipfSenseN Offline
                                NollipfSense
                                last edited by

                                @webdawg said in pfSense 2.5 Release Date News:

                                I do not want to come off as unappreciative

                                Same here...that's why I believe if an entity made a strategy decision, it should follow through. That's what I admired in Apple despite my expensive hardware became obsolete...but guess what, I turned around and bought many more.

                                I had been causally reading up on Restconf API here: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8040 If I were pfSense, I would have at least make it available as a package...that way, the open source would continue to support innovation while remaining adaptable to all members. I think that's the essence of open source.

                                pfSense+ 23.09 Lenovo Thinkcentre M93P SFF Quadcore i7 dual Raid-ZFS 128GB-SSD 32GB-RAM PCI-Intel i350-t4 NIC, -Intel QAT 8950.
                                pfSense+ 23.09 VM-Proxmox, Dell Precision Xeon-W2155 Nvme 500GB-ZFS 128GB-RAM PCIe-Intel i350-t4, Intel QAT-8950, P-cloud.

                                ahking19A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • ahking19A Offline
                                  ahking19 @NollipfSense
                                  last edited by

                                  @NollipfSense What do you know that we don't? Where has it been said that the plan to use RESTCONF API has been dropped? I think you are jumping to conclusions. It's only been stated that RESTCONF API is not part of the 2.5 release.

                                  Re: release as a package - I think you are underestimating the work involved and what the API will be used for. There has been a roadmap posts on the Netgate blog.

                                  https://www.netgate.com/blog/further-a-roadmap-for-pfsense.html
                                  https://www.netgate.com/blog/more-on-aes-ni.html

                                  Granted the posts are from 2015 & 2017 and maybe it is time for an updated roadmap blog post from Netgate. My guess is the API will be part of the 3.0 release, where the webGUI is rewritten. Why update the current PHP webGUI to use RESTCONF now only to replace all of PHP for 3.0 with Python? I'd rather have the developers working on 3.0.

                                  W NollipfSenseN T 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • W Offline
                                    webdawg @ahking19
                                    last edited by

                                    @ahking19 Yeh, that is why I was asking. If the previous road-maps are not accurate...I was just looking for an update. I did not want to turn this thread bad.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • R Offline
                                      Rod-It
                                      last edited by

                                      Why was new hardware bought for a release that as yet has not official date?

                                      Even if you waited until it was released, before buying new hardware, it's not like it takes months to arrive anyway.

                                      M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                      • NollipfSenseN Offline
                                        NollipfSense @ahking19
                                        last edited by NollipfSense

                                        @ahking19 said in pfSense 2.5 Release Date News:

                                        What do you know that we don't? Where has it been said that the plan to use RESTCONF API has been dropped? I think you are jumping to conclusions. It's only been stated that RESTCONF API is not part of the 2.5 release.

                                        Absolutely nothing, in fact, I am learning from you. I didn't mean to imply RESTCONF dropping, only dropped from 2.5v. I am just wanting to learn about it since I encounter pfSense late 2016 and that the gospel was all newbies should get hardware to meet pfSense 2.5v.

                                        @webdawg said in pfSense 2.5 Release Date News:

                                        I did not want to turn this thread bad.

                                        Not at all and was never intended to be that way either...my hope is others checkout RESTCONF.

                                        @Rod-It said in pfSense 2.5 Release Date News:

                                        Why was new hardware bought for a release that as yet has not official date?

                                        I had not visited the forum for quite awhile but remembered most of the talk with newbies during 2017 -2018 on the forum was to get hardware to meet pfSense 2.5v. So, after buying the hardware and returning to the forum, that's when I found out. The good thing is I got what I was seeking in hardware, and it should able to grow with pfSense over the next five years.

                                        pfSense+ 23.09 Lenovo Thinkcentre M93P SFF Quadcore i7 dual Raid-ZFS 128GB-SSD 32GB-RAM PCI-Intel i350-t4 NIC, -Intel QAT 8950.
                                        pfSense+ 23.09 VM-Proxmox, Dell Precision Xeon-W2155 Nvme 500GB-ZFS 128GB-RAM PCIe-Intel i350-t4, Intel QAT-8950, P-cloud.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • Z Offline
                                          Zermus
                                          last edited by Zermus

                                          Dang, if they're waiting on FreeBSD 12.1 we probably will not see 2.5 this year.

                                          NollipfSenseN 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • NollipfSenseN Offline
                                            NollipfSense @Zermus
                                            last edited by NollipfSense

                                            @Zermus said in pfSense 2.5 Release Date News:

                                            Dang, if they're waiting on FreeBSD 12.1 we probably will not see 2.5 this year.

                                            It surely is appearing that way!

                                            pfSense+ 23.09 Lenovo Thinkcentre M93P SFF Quadcore i7 dual Raid-ZFS 128GB-SSD 32GB-RAM PCI-Intel i350-t4 NIC, -Intel QAT 8950.
                                            pfSense+ 23.09 VM-Proxmox, Dell Precision Xeon-W2155 Nvme 500GB-ZFS 128GB-RAM PCIe-Intel i350-t4, Intel QAT-8950, P-cloud.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.