Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Multicast address log spam

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved pfBlockerNG
    7 Posts 3 Posters 760 Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • provelsP
      provels
      last edited by provels

      I'm getting a ton of FW log spam for clients contacting multicast addresses on UDP. It's being blocked by pfB_PRI1_v4. Should I just disable logging for that rule or is there a better way to cut down the noise?
      72fde85f-4509-4afc-b477-d1ac1f55ec3e-image.png

      Peder

      MAIN - pfSense+ 24.11-RELEASE - Adlink MXE-5401, i7, 16 GB RAM, 64 GB SSD. 500 GB HDD for SyslogNG
      BACKUP - pfSense+ 23.01-RELEASE - Hyper-V Virtual Machine, Gen 1, 2 v-CPUs, 3 GB RAM, 8GB VHDX (Dynamic)

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • johnpozJ
        johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
        last edited by johnpoz

        Just put a rule above that doesn't log that dest range. You could put it in floating if need be - not sure why that range would be in that list anyway?

        An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
        If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
        Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
        SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

        provelsP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • provelsP
          provels @johnpoz
          last edited by provels

          @johnpoz Thanks for the reply. I put a rule above the pfB rules to allow LAN UDP to 224.0.0.0/4 (no log) which worked until pfB updated. At that time, the rule was pushed below the pfB LAN rules. Tried to put in floating, but no effect. I'll try to find which list is causing it.

          EDIT - OK, looks like a list I added from http://sanyalnet-cloud-vps.freeddns.org/mirai-ips.txt contains 224.0.0.0/3.
          Does that network also contain 224.0.0.0/4?
          Sorry, subnetting has never been my forte... :(

          Peder

          MAIN - pfSense+ 24.11-RELEASE - Adlink MXE-5401, i7, 16 GB RAM, 64 GB SSD. 500 GB HDD for SyslogNG
          BACKUP - pfSense+ 23.01-RELEASE - Hyper-V Virtual Machine, Gen 1, 2 v-CPUs, 3 GB RAM, 8GB VHDX (Dynamic)

          NogBadTheBadN 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • NogBadTheBadN
            NogBadTheBad @provels
            last edited by

            @provels

            EDIT - OK, looks like a list I added from http://sanyalnet-cloud-vps.freeddns.org/mirai-ips.txt contains 224.0.0.0/3.
            Does that network also contain 224.0.0.0/4?
            Sorry, subnetting has never been my forte... :(

            224.0.0.0/3 = 224.0.0.0 - 255.255.255.255

            224.0.0.0/4 = 224.0.0.0 - 239.255.255.255

            Why the heck does the list have multicast addresses in ?

            Andy

            1 x Netgate SG-4860 - 3 x Linksys LGS308P - 1 x Aruba InstantOn AP22

            provelsP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • provelsP
              provels @NogBadTheBad
              last edited by provels

              @NogBadTheBad Thanks, that explains it. Go figure. Not even sure whyI picked it. Their other blocklist includes 224.0.0.0/4, too.
              http://sanyalnet-cloud-vps.freeddns.org

              Peder

              MAIN - pfSense+ 24.11-RELEASE - Adlink MXE-5401, i7, 16 GB RAM, 64 GB SSD. 500 GB HDD for SyslogNG
              BACKUP - pfSense+ 23.01-RELEASE - Hyper-V Virtual Machine, Gen 1, 2 v-CPUs, 3 GB RAM, 8GB VHDX (Dynamic)

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • johnpozJ
                johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                last edited by johnpoz

                Why would a block list contain a multicast address? Is a good question - list maintainer is an idiot?? Would be my guess ;)

                I personally not a fan of any sort of auto rules that get generated by some package to be honest, I just use pfblocker to create the aliases, and then use them in my own rules. This way you do not have to worry about rules being put into different orders.

                But floating rules are evaluated before interface rules, as long as you mark them "quick" so my guess is when you created the floating you didn't mark "quick" on it..

                quick.jpg

                An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                provelsP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • provelsP
                  provels @johnpoz
                  last edited by

                  @johnpoz said in Multicast address log spam:

                  But floating rules are evaluated before interface rules, as long as you mark them "quick" so my guess is when you created the floating you didn't mark "quick" on it..

                  Yes, you're right. Thanks for the tip.

                  Peder

                  MAIN - pfSense+ 24.11-RELEASE - Adlink MXE-5401, i7, 16 GB RAM, 64 GB SSD. 500 GB HDD for SyslogNG
                  BACKUP - pfSense+ 23.01-RELEASE - Hyper-V Virtual Machine, Gen 1, 2 v-CPUs, 3 GB RAM, 8GB VHDX (Dynamic)

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.