Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Default deny rule IPv4 (1000000103) over layer 2 VPN it should NOT be using

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Firewalling
    5 Posts 3 Posters 788 Views 4 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • lean-on-heL Offline
      lean-on-he
      last edited by

      Getting "Default deny rule IPv4 (1000000103)"
      41362781-c997-4812-8fd4-24b0c979f844-image.png
      I am trying to RDP from SRV01 to SRV02 all on the machines are okay.
      I have a firewall rule and nat rule in FW02 that nats if you rdp to the transit interface on the FW02 it forwards to SVR2 and i can see in the log on FW02 it is allowed, but then on FW01 i see that it is blocked with the "Default deny rule IPv4 (1000000103)"

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • RicoR Offline
        Rico LAYER 8 Rebel Alliance
        last edited by

        Why do you NAT and not route?
        Can you please show your settings/Firewall Rules with screenshots?

        -Rico

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • lean-on-heL Offline
          lean-on-he
          last edited by

          @Rico, My hero,hopefully

          Nat-Rule.PNG

          FW-Rule.PNG

          firewall log.PNG

          Threw in the Firewall log that allowed the traffic.

          Bonus Info.
          There is another server on the 192.168.1.0/24 net where there is a nat rule that allowes from the same net as SRV01 to another server in the same Lan but here there is a forward from 8080 to 80. this works. and i do not see any trafic on FW01 on this traffic.

          JKnottJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • JKnottJ Offline
            JKnott @lean-on-he
            last edited by

            @lean-on-he said in Default deny rule IPv4 (1000000103) over layer 2 VPN it should NOT be using:

            There is another server on the 192.168.1.0/24 net where there is a nat rule that allowes from the same net as SRV01 to another server in the same Lan

            This is another example of why NAT is a curse on networking. It causes people to do dumb things. The proper solution is to move to IPv6, and avoid this sort of nonsense. Having 2 networks with the same IP address can only cause problems. I first came across this sort of issue several years ago, while travelling for work. I'd be in a hotel and try to connect home via VPN. But since the hotel network used the same addresses as my home network, I couldn't access anything on my home network. I had to move my network to an address range that is not commonly used.

            PfSense running on Qotom mini PC
            i5 CPU, 4 GB memory, 32 GB SSD & 4 Intel Gb Ethernet ports.
            UniFi AC-Lite access point

            I haven't lost my mind. It's around here...somewhere...

            lean-on-heL 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • lean-on-heL Offline
              lean-on-he @JKnott
              last edited by lean-on-he

              @JKnott
              I think you misunderstood.

              Nat problem.PNG
              The 192.168.1.0/24 is 1 lan over a layer 2 tunnel, so using the same IP's in 2 different net does not cause the problem.

              Connecting from the same place.
              I can connect to the server 192.168.1.53:8080
              I cannot connet to the server 192.168.1.50:3389

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • First post
                Last post
              Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.