Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Latest update 8/02/2020

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved pfBlockerNG
    5 Posts 4 Posters 623 Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • Z
      zimnysbrain
      last edited by zimnysbrain

      I got total mess with two of my pfsense installations after the latest update.
      Both endpoints have enabled future to keep existing setup but latest update ignore it completely.
      Please be more responsible when you upload update to your platform.
      Testing updates before release it is a good idea!
      Very disappointed and a lot of work behind me to fix.
      Unprofessional

      BBcan177 - focus more on quality from tune up interface which is already good

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • chpalmerC
        chpalmer
        last edited by

        Your missing a bit of information here. What version of pfSense are you trying to update? Release or snapshots?

        Update from which version?

        Testing updates before release it is a good idea!

        Releases are fully tested before release. Thats what snapshots help to do. Snapshots should never be run on a system you are using for primetime.

        BBcan177 -

        Curious why you would call him out on a thread such as this..

        Are you following the readily available guides for updates to your system?

        Triggering snowflakes one by one..
        Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4590T CPU @ 2.00GHz on an M400 WG box.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • provelsP
          provels
          last edited by

          FWIW, I just powered up my 2.5-dev VM and updated to
          2.5.0-DEVELOPMENT (amd64)
          built on Fri Feb 07 20:07:31 EST 2020.
          On reboot I saw that pfBlockerNG-devel upgraded itself automagically from 2.2.5_28 to _29. All my settings were kept, but is that expected behavior?
          72c5be1b-7a00-4537-ac05-f9e90f3d7b3b-image.png

          Peder

          MAIN - pfSense+ 24.11-RELEASE - Adlink MXE-5401, i7, 16 GB RAM, 64 GB SSD. 500 GB HDD for SyslogNG
          BACKUP - pfSense+ 23.01-RELEASE - Hyper-V Virtual Machine, Gen 1, 2 v-CPUs, 3 GB RAM, 8GB VHDX (Dynamic)

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • NollipfSenseN
            NollipfSense
            last edited by NollipfSense

            It sounds as if the OP didn't make a backup (unprofessional)...then pointing fingers at others. I run the 2.5-dev in home-office production mode; however, I always have a backup and ready to roll in less than fifteen minutes.

            pfSense+ 23.09 Lenovo Thinkcentre M93P SFF Quadcore i7 dual Raid-ZFS 128GB-SSD 32GB-RAM PCI-Intel i350-t4 NIC, -Intel QAT 8950.
            pfSense+ 23.09 VM-Proxmox, Dell Precision Xeon-W2155 Nvme 500GB-ZFS 128GB-RAM PCIe-Intel i350-t4, Intel QAT-8950, P-cloud.

            provelsP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • provelsP
              provels @NollipfSense
              last edited by provels

              @ZIMNYSBRAIN @NollipfSense No reason not to have Automatic Configuration Backup enabled. But still curious why pfB updated on its own...?

              Peder

              MAIN - pfSense+ 24.11-RELEASE - Adlink MXE-5401, i7, 16 GB RAM, 64 GB SSD. 500 GB HDD for SyslogNG
              BACKUP - pfSense+ 23.01-RELEASE - Hyper-V Virtual Machine, Gen 1, 2 v-CPUs, 3 GB RAM, 8GB VHDX (Dynamic)

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • First post
                Last post
              Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.