Problem with captive portal on a non-nated interface

[paketdos]

I am trying to set up a captive portal on an interface that does not have nat
it use routable address

i am using the 1.2.3 RC1 version.

if i set the portal on OPT1 (a nated interface) everything works fine.
if i switch frome OPT1 to OPT2 (a non-nated interace). the portal web page
appear and i can loggin to it (i see my user in status page), but i cannot go any further

i tried to run ipfw show, and i see automatic rule created for my IP, and i can see traffic
going thru those rule (not blocked by the 19904 rule) but nothing come back to my internal
machines

i have searched the forum and web site. for similar case. but did not find any

Is the captive portal compatible with non-nated interface?  has anyone succeeded in a
similar configuration ?

i will try different version, in a vmware lab i am setting up. but i was wondering if anybody knew
something about this problem

Thank for your reply
Math

[eri--]

Give more detials.
This is just telling nothing!

[paketdos]

Thanks for your interest.

I was just wondering if my problem was a "known limitation" or
if i have hit a bug\misconfiguration.

the firewall is sort of a departemental-firewall, the organisation use a large
10.x.y.z network. and the departement is a subnet of that large network.
i cannot use NAT for that firewall.

my WAN is a large 10.x.y.z
my LAN is a 192.168.x.y (for testing with NAT activated)
my OPT1 is a subnet of the large 10.x.y.z

i started by setting up the captive portal on the LAN "testing" network
and it worked fine.
than i switched from LAN to OPT1 "production" network
and all my traffic was blocked.

this is firewall is now in production (without the portal) so i cannot do many test on it
i will settup a test lab to reproduce the problem

[paketdos]

So i did set up a lab

and the captive portal works well with non-nated interface

it is probably a misconfiguration on my part, i still dont know why
it is not working in the production firewall. but i know it is possible.

i will probably have to redo the whole configuration from scratch.

thanks for your interrest
Math