WireGuard interface IPv6 prefixlen

[Ghola]

I'm trying to set up two WireGuard tunnels. These are the addresses I have been provided:

• 10.72.69.xxx/32,fc00:bbbb:bbbb:bb01::9:xxxx/128
• 10.71.231.xxx/32,fc00:bbbb:bbbb:bb01::8:xxxx/128

I can add the first one fine, but then I get this error when trying to add the second:

The following input errors were detected:
fc00:bbbb:bbbb:bb01::8:xxxx/128 is already configured on this firewall: OPT10 (fc00:bbbb:bbbb:bb01::9:xxxx/64)

As the error indicates, the first interface seems to have been assigned a /64 rather than the specified /128. Confirmed with ifconfig wg0:

    inet 10.72.69.xxx netmask 0xffffffff
    inet6 fc00:bbbb:bbbb:bb01::9:xxxx prefixlen 64

Am I missing something? This seems like a bug.

[Ghola]

I dug further into this. It is a bug. When I add the first interface, /etc/inc/web/wg.inc does this:

/sbin/ifconfig 'wg0' inet6 'fc00:bbbb:bbbb:bb01::9:xxxx' netmask '255.255.255.255'

If I apply the attached fix, it does this instead:

/sbin/ifconfig 'wg0' inet6 'fc00:bbbb:bbbb:bb01::9:xxxx' prefixlen '128'

wg.inc.patch

[Manatee]

This post is deleted!

[nva]

Ahh a fellow Mullvad user. I had same problem and was going to post this. Are Netgate aware of this bug? I just take a look at bug tracker and it seems nobody posted this there. Tagging mod @dennis_s

[dennis_s]

@nva Thanks for the mention...let me bring this up to our engineers.

[dennis_s]

@ghola Can you please open a ticket on Redmine for this issue. You can find details of what is needed here.

[Ghola]

@dennis_s Sure! Opened bug #11618.