seeing fewer alerts than I would expect with Snort on WAN
-
@pzanga said in seeing fewer alerts than I would expect with Snort on WAN:
@bmeeks
No worries. I appreciate the fact you took the time to help with this, and we did find an answer and I learned some things. So, if this is working as designed I will just run with it as is. I guess my last question would be "how significant is the lack of SO rules in terms of Snort's functioning as an IDS/IPS (i.e. are there significant threats that are potentially being missed)?".Well, the SO rules do cover certain unique threats. Whether you actually have exposure to them is something you would have to investigate. But since you can't use them anyway, with your ARM hardware, no sense worrying about it unless you change hardware to an Intel/AMD platform.
Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.