Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    seeing fewer alerts than I would expect with Snort on WAN

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IDS/IPS
    21 Posts 4 Posters 1.8k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • bmeeksB
      bmeeks @pzanga
      last edited by

      @pzanga said in seeing fewer alerts than I would expect with Snort on WAN:

      @bmeeks
      No worries. I appreciate the fact you took the time to help with this, and we did find an answer and I learned some things. So, if this is working as designed I will just run with it as is. I guess my last question would be "how significant is the lack of SO rules in terms of Snort's functioning as an IDS/IPS (i.e. are there significant threats that are potentially being missed)?".

      Well, the SO rules do cover certain unique threats. Whether you actually have exposure to them is something you would have to investigate. But since you can't use them anyway, with your ARM hardware, no sense worrying about it unless you change hardware to an Intel/AMD platform.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • First post
        Last post
      Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.