Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Nat reflection

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved 1.2.3-PRERELEASE-TESTING snapshots - RETIRED
    4 Posts 3 Posters 2.9k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • U
      ugur
      last edited by

      nat reflection not working on
      1.2.3-RC2
      built on Wed Jul 22 03:48:08 EDT 2009
      FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE-p2 i386

      (disable nat reflection unchecked)

      ps. like this config 1.2.2 and 1.2 running.

      -
      Ugur.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • GruensFroeschliG
        GruensFroeschli
        last edited by

        Setup? Background? How did you test? Any changes in the config? Messages in the systemlog?

        We do what we must, because we can.

        Asking questions the smart way: http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • U
          ugur
          last edited by

          yes. exactly.

          lan: 192.168.1.1
          wan: 88.x.x.2
          vip: 88.x.x.3/24 88.x.x.4/24 (…)
          dmz: 10.6.1.1
          web: 10.6.1.3 gw 10.6.1.1

          nat outbound:
          192.168.1.4/32 -> 88.x.x.4
          10.6.1.3/32 -> 88.x.x.3

          pfwd: wan/tcp/80 10.6.1.3/88.x.x.3

          lan: all port open
          dmz: all port open
          wan: all to 10.6.1.3 port 80 open

          nat refl.: unchecked

          and
          i use pf 1.5+ years
          and
          this config running 1.2 and 1.2.2 (no nat reflection problem)

          -
          Ugur.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • T
            tracer
            last edited by

            We're seeing a similar thing, it either doesn't work, or ports are mixed up.
            Meaning we're doing Port forwards with aliases, where more than one port is redirected.
            Is this legal ?

            thanks in advance

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • First post
              Last post
            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.