Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Firewall Rule for gateway online ONLY

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved OpenVPN
    16 Posts 2 Posters 1.5k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • B
      Bambos
      last edited by Bambos

      Hello everyone,

      i have a site to site VPN where on the client firewall vpn interface i have an open rule, so i manage everything on the server side vpn interface (on each interface of each site)

      For the time i need to just keep the tunnel, without allowing any traffic, so i set this rule : where net and address on this is the tunnel IP's.
      e43508bd-50aa-4502-8cff-481090131219-image.png

      on the client side is red:
      fd950493-32ee-4729-9b51-70b18e32db79-image.png

      By the time i'm changing the firewall rule to specific Host, 172.18.29.2 (which is in the range of the net according the previous firewall rule)
      3d56e1b0-bea2-4922-83d1-09c60d56363f-image.png the gateway on the client turns green:
      3a61b9af-4f78-4681-a108-f8ada166c28f-image.png

      Is there any explanation for this, or is something like a bug ??

      V 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • V
        viragomann @Bambos
        last edited by

        @bambos said in Firewall Rule for gateway online ONLY:

        where net and address on this is the tunnel IP's

        Are you really sure???

        The fact that the gateway name is quite different let me doubt.

        B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • B
          Bambos @viragomann
          last edited by

          @viragomann I'm very sure :) !!! see below server and client IPs.

          0df789d4-4ccf-4721-9da6-34a8e5b7f43f-image.png

          7e3e24c4-9a94-4a29-bb8d-87493271c6b0-image.png

          V 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • V
            viragomann @Bambos
            last edited by

            @bambos
            That doesn't say really much.

            Post a screenshot of System > Routing > Gateways, please.

            B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • B
              Bambos @viragomann
              last edited by

              @viragomann yes..

              013ba010-8cac-4a6c-b243-51355c30da2c-image.png

              V 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • V
                viragomann @Bambos
                last edited by

                @bambos
                That's a small section, not the whole screen and that does not match to the gateway you've monitoring issues.

                B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • B
                  Bambos @viragomann
                  last edited by

                  @viragomann why not ?? .1 is the server, .2 is the client.

                  this is the whole section

                  e6c4a3ae-494d-4764-819b-3c92624f7d94-image.png

                  V 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • V
                    viragomann @Bambos
                    last edited by

                    @bambos
                    So there is no gateway with the name "SUNTECHNICS_VPN_VPNV" in this list as shown in the monitoring screen above.

                    So I'm quite wondering, where you got this screen from. Is it from the other site of the VPN?

                    B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • B
                      Bambos @viragomann
                      last edited by Bambos

                      @viragomann i think you confused a little. The red gateway was on the VPN client side, not having the correct firewall rule on the server interface ! please see post 1 again.

                      As i said , i have an allow all on the client side (vpn interface) and control only on the server side (vpn interface).

                      V 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • V
                        viragomann @Bambos
                        last edited by

                        @bambos
                        Okay, I've reproduced this in my network. You're right. The ping doesn't work if the source is the implicit network variable for what ever reason.
                        But it works, when I state the tunnel network in numbers.

                        Yes, seems as a bug, which shouldn't behave like that.

                        B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • B
                          Bambos @viragomann
                          last edited by

                          @viragomann thanks a lot Sir, i'm glad we figured this out. How we can put that on official bugs so netgate could resolve ?

                          V 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • V
                            viragomann @Bambos
                            last edited by

                            @bambos
                            You may find a link in the forum, I think.
                            But did you get this on a current release? I reproduced it on 2.4.5, so I don't know if it still persists.

                            Additional info:
                            Checked out /tmp/rules.debug and found that the net is replaced with the clients IP with /32 mask.
                            So obviously the net doesn't work properly with OpenVPN interfaces on the client, the tunnel network is not taken over in the variable even if it is stated in the settings.

                            B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                            • B
                              Bambos @viragomann
                              last edited by

                              @viragomann client is 2.4.5 and server is 2.5.1.

                              V 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • V
                                viragomann @Bambos
                                last edited by

                                @bambos
                                So we don't know if it still persists in recent versions at all.
                                I kicked my only one 2.6 installation due to dynamic DNS issues.

                                I would prescind from reporting a bug in this case.

                                B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • B
                                  Bambos @viragomann
                                  last edited by Bambos

                                  @viragomann Hello Sir !!!

                                  I have tested this again with both client and server to 2.6 latest version.
                                  Same problem appears.

                                  0392bda0-4005-4715-9a6e-0483d0e95ca8-image.png

                                  First rule is not letting the client ping, so gateway is red.
                                  second rule let the client gateway ping (and going green)

                                  172.18.47.2 it is a part of the LAN47_MXGREEN net, so to my understanding is the same firewall rule !!

                                  as a prove i have it first, and 0B traffic there. Is this a bug now ?

                                  V 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • V
                                    viragomann @Bambos
                                    last edited by

                                    @bambos
                                    Yes, I agree that it behaves in an other way than expected. Obviously the 'interface net' alias doesn't work with OpenVPN interfaces.

                                    If you check Status > Interfaces the site to site OpenVPNs interfaces have a 255.255.255.255 mask. So it only includes the interface IP. And the same is adopted in the rule.
                                    Don't know, what's the reason for this behavior.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • First post
                                      Last post
                                    Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.