Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    interface groups - multi wan

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Firewalling
    4 Posts 2 Posters 848 Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • 4
      4o4rh
      last edited by

      "Interface groups are not effective with Multi-WAN because group rules cannot properly handle reply-to. Due to that deficiency, traffic matching a group rule on a WAN that does not have the default gateway will go back out the WAN with the default gateway, and not through the interface which it entered." -

      does this mean interface groups are not effective on wan interfaces when multiple wans exist, or they are not effective on any interface i.e. lan groups when multple wans exist?

      V 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • V
        viragomann @4o4rh
        last edited by

        @gwaitsi
        The reply-to tag is added to a connection by the firewall rule which allows the incoming traffic. This requires that the interface, which the rule is applied, is unique and that it has a gateway assigned.
        Interface group rules don't have a unique interface naturally. Hence pfSense does not add the reply-to to connections which are allowed by such rules.
        The same applies to floating rules.

        However, you can use interface groups for internal interfaces to share rules though, even with a multi WAN setup.

        4 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • 4
          4o4rh @viragomann
          last edited by

          @viragomann so in simply english, if i have 2 wan connected and 2 lans, i can use an interface group for the 2 LANs, but not the 2 WANs, correct ?

          V 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • V
            viragomann @4o4rh
            last edited by

            @gwaitsi
            Correct. Reply-to is only needed on WANs (interfaces with a gateway assigned to it).

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • First post
              Last post
            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.