Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    PfSense plus 23.01,05 over Proxmox: disable checksum offloading on nic not necessary ?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Virtualization
    3 Posts 2 Posters 696 Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • L
      Luca De Andreis
      last edited by

      Hello everyone !

      I have been using PfSense with Proxmox for many years, I remember well that using NIC VIRTIO it was necessary to disable checksum offloading on the NIC:

      However, recently (Proxmox 7.4 -> Qemu 7.x -> PfSense on kernel 14.0 : Pfsense 23.01-05) I installed several new virtual firewalls and forgot this workaround ..... after months I remembered, and in fact it is not set (see the picture....).
      I was amazed that everything works perfectly.

      Is that tuning no longer necessary ? I remember that at one time the network did not work without....

      81e4855c-b4b9-4877-a571-bb048079678c-immagine.png
      Thanks

      Luca

      NollipfSenseN 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • NollipfSenseN
        NollipfSense @Luca De Andreis
        last edited by NollipfSense

        @Luca-De-Andreis You'll find the answer here: https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/recipes/virtualize-proxmox-ve.html
        Here is a screenshot of the most important declaration...

        Screenshot 2023-06-26 at 7.53.18 AM.png

        pfSense+ 23.09 Lenovo Thinkcentre M93P SFF Quadcore i7 dual Raid-ZFS 128GB-SSD 32GB-RAM PCI-Intel i350-t4 NIC, -Intel QAT 8950.
        pfSense+ 23.09 VM-Proxmox, Dell Precision Xeon-W2155 Nvme 500GB-ZFS 128GB-RAM PCIe-Intel i350-t4, Intel QAT-8950, P-cloud.

        L 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • L
          Luca De Andreis @NollipfSense
          last edited by

          @NollipfSense that's why it works correctly, it disables it automatically (although it's always good to disable it ALSO manually)

          Thank you very much

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • First post
            Last post
          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.