• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
Netgate Discussion Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

[solved] IP-blocking: Huge discrepancy between Original and Master

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved pfBlockerNG
2 Posts 1 Posters 425 Views
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • B
    Bob.Dig LAYER 8
    last edited by Bob.Dig Aug 22, 2023, 3:25 PM Aug 14, 2023, 9:14 AM

    I tried to add FireHOL to pfBlocker and I see the following.

    [ firehollevel1_v4 ]		 Reload [ 08/14/23 11:06:40 ] . completed ..
      ------------------------------
      Original Master     Final     
      ------------------------------
      2011     706        706         [ Pass ] 
      -----------------------------------------------------------------
    
    [ firehollevel2_v4 ]		 Reload [ 08/14/23 11:06:41 ] . completed ..
      ------------------------------
      Original Master     Final     
      ------------------------------
      14204    10         10          [ Pass ] 
      -----------------------------------------------------------------
    

    From 14204 IPs only 10 make it through for "firehollevel2". Could somebody please explain that to me?
    (Edit: Technically, I could be blocking those IPs already in other list? How can I be sure that this is the case.)

    pfSense Table Stats
    -------------------
    table-entries hard limit  9000000
    Table Usage Count         489074
    
     UPDATE PROCESS ENDED [ 08/14/23 11:06:51 ]
    

    This vm has 8 GB RAM.

    23.05.1-RELEASE
    pfBlockerNG-devel 3.2.0_5

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • B Bob.Dig referenced this topic on Aug 14, 2023, 9:44 AM
    • B
      Bob.Dig LAYER 8
      last edited by Aug 22, 2023, 3:25 PM

      Because no one answered I guess now that it must be de-duplication. So I mark this solved.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      2 out of 2
      • First post
        2/2
        Last post
      Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.
        This community forum collects and processes your personal information.
        consent.not_received