Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Haproxy 100% cpu usage

    Cache/Proxy
    7
    47
    4.5k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • C
      coreybrett
      last edited by

      9865886a-71df-49ae-b063-702e2a2fa9da-image.png

      984c9778-fa5b-4c3e-8629-ee6b34b07147-image.png

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • C
        coreybrett
        last edited by

        3b7600db-31c0-4270-bb5f-be08b1112e02-image.png

        After a stop/start, the HAP process hit 100% and stops responding to inbound requests.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • L
          Luca De Andreis @stephenw10
          last edited by

          @stephenw10

          I can confirm. in my case haproxy generates a kernel panic (occasionally). pfsense 24.03 is stable (more than 30 installations in my case) only with the use of haproxy do kernel panics occur. in this case I went back to the previous version.

          Luca

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • stephenw10S
            stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
            last edited by

            Do you also see the high CPU usage?

            L M 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • L
              Luca De Andreis @stephenw10
              last edited by

              @stephenw10

              We have two PfSense with HAProxy (dedicated) in 24.03, on the site with the most traffic (a while ago now), we noticed that the VM would reboot going the crash.
              Both VMs were experiencing abnormal CPU load (not 100%).
              On the third crash I rolled back to 23.09.1 and it has been working perfectly ever since.
              The site with less load at the HAProxy level (I left it only for testing in 24.03) never crashed but still has abnormal CPU load (30-40% without doing practically anything).
              The site in production with a fair number of accesses, stayed UP 3-5 days, then crashed. After downgrade to version 23.09.1.... perfect.

              All PfSense works in VM and we have about 30 of them, only those with HAProxy gave this problem with 24.03.

              Sergei_ShablovskyS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • M
                maverick_slo @stephenw10
                last edited by

                @stephenw10 why are we discussing this when solution is crystal clear?
                Binary has to be updated, end of story.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • stephenw10S
                  stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                  last edited by

                  Yup, raised it internally. But trying to determine if the reported kernel panic is actually related.

                  L 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                  • L
                    Luca De Andreis @stephenw10
                    last edited by

                    @stephenw10

                    For me, yes, it's related.

                    In my case a PfSense 24.03 VM (with HA Proxy 2.9.1) crashed (and therefore auto rebooted) every 3-5 days.
                    With a usage load... typical of a reverse proxy in production.

                    The same VM but with almost no workload, it never crashed apart from an anomalous CPU load.

                    In my opinion yes, the events are correlated, but only when the reverse proxy is used above a certain threshold.

                    In this regard I had also opened a ticket via "professional" support, which was closed with the response... "HAProxy is a third-party package, its update is managed in best effort" .... closed.

                    Sergei_ShablovskyS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • stephenw10S
                      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                      last edited by

                      Hmm, nothing much TAC can do beyond opening the bug report, which they did.

                      We have devs looking at it now.

                      L 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • L
                        Luca De Andreis @stephenw10
                        last edited by Luca De Andreis

                        @stephenw10

                        ahh I forgot.

                        After opening the support ticket (and before downgrading to version 23.09.1) I applied the "disable zero copy forwarding" workaround.

                        The CPU returned to normal on the VM with HAProxy in production... unfortunately after a few days the crash and related reboot occurred again.

                        I then rolled back to 23.09.1 ​​and the system has been completely rock solid ever since.

                        Luca

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • stephenw10S
                          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                          last edited by

                          OK the backend haproxy pkg had been updated to current (2.9.7) and looks good in testing here.

                          You can upgrade it dircetly like: pkg upgrade haproxy

                          Or reinstall the pfSense HAProxy package to get it.

                          If this confirms the fix and doesn't introduce any new show stoppers we'll bump the package version so it appears as an upgrade for all users.

                          Steve

                          L 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                          • L
                            Luca De Andreis @stephenw10
                            last edited by

                            @stephenw10

                            ... upgrade to 2.9.7 in production and... for now... works fine :)

                            Thanks
                            Luca

                            M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                            • M
                              maverick_slo @Luca De Andreis
                              last edited by

                              Same here, removed workaround as well
                              All good last 8 hours ..

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • stephenw10S
                                stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                last edited by

                                Great, thanks for testing.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • C
                                  coreybrett
                                  last edited by

                                  I upgraded last night.

                                  Still having same issue.

                                  247da18f-2d04-4b07-8b49-93f737527cdb-image.png

                                  M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • M
                                    maverick_slo @coreybrett
                                    last edited by maverick_slo

                                    @coreybrett you probably did not restart service after upgrade.
                                    Please restart service so that new binary can be run...

                                    C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                    • C
                                      coreybrett @maverick_slo
                                      last edited by

                                      @maverick_slo I am pretty sure I rebooted after running the package update
                                      will do so again and check it in the morning

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • stephenw10S
                                        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                        last edited by

                                        You should see it in the stats page:

                                        HAProxy version 2.9.7-5742051, released 2024/04/05
                                        Statistics Report for pid 81592
                                        
                                        L 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • L
                                          Luca De Andreis @stephenw10
                                          last edited by

                                          @stephenw10

                                          I can confirm that after this uptime:
                                          f2709fec-bb14-4aea-8dd6-3ccdf6814179-immagine.png

                                          HAProxy on a normal production load and without workaround applied... works fine:

                                          54b362ed-7c24-442d-901b-40695bf2f239-immagine.png

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                          • C
                                            coreybrett
                                            last edited by

                                            Still having trouble with this.

                                            934ff6f6-81db-4d3c-bf42-29f46ff28afa-image.png

                                            Shell Output - /usr/local/sbin/haproxy -v
                                            HAProxy version 2.9.7-5742051 2024/04/05 - https://haproxy.org/
                                            Status: stable branch - will stop receiving fixes around Q1 2025.
                                            Known bugs: http://www.haproxy.org/bugs/bugs-2.9.7.html
                                            Running on: FreeBSD 15.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 15.0-CURRENT #0 plus-RELENG_24_03-n256311-e71f834dd81: Fri Apr 19 00:28:14 UTC 2024     root@freebsd:/var/jenkins/workspac
                                            
                                            L stephenw10S 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.