CPU load on 1100
-
On the netgate 1100 I see a rather high load with 24.11beta
RAM usage is at 67% ... so "green"
CPU usage often at 100%.
Seems that php-fpm and the web GUI are the hogs. Restarted php-fpm, rebooted etc, trying to get a feeling.
for now I disable pfblockerng to reduce the load .. doesn't change anything visible
maybe it's just the dashboard displaying wrong
-
@sgw At a shell prompt run
top-aSH
https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/troubleshooting/high-cpu-load.html
Is this when maxing out the Internet connection? If so what is your Internet speed?
-
@SteveITS my speed is rather low: 60/15 MBit/s
I started that top-command without the WebGUI running.
load ~2 (without pfblockerng)logged into GUI, load went up to 8, now it's 3-4
GUI rather laggy ... dashboard takes a while, shows CPU 100%
load now around 6
stopped/disabled telegraf
looks like this right now
EDIT: now it's at ~4 again. I am NOT maxing out the line.
-
same issue with my 4100, only since this beta...
something in the PHP UI drives the CPU high when, i strongly suspect the Wireguard Widget
you can use the System Activity to view this, but from the shell, with a dashboard open and the Wireguard Widget active (no active wireguard connections):
ps aux | head -15 USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TT STAT STARTED TIME COMMAND root 11 52.5 0.0 0 32 - RNL Sun13 7411:56.94 [idle] root 5515 29.2 1.5 147720 60224 - S 17:22 4:50.43 php-fpm: pool nginx (php-fpm) root 12162 28.6 1.4 145672 58188 - R 17:16 5:53.14 php-fpm: pool nginx (php-fpm) root 64469 25.7 1.4 145672 57228 - R 17:53 1:11.81 php-fpm: pool nginx (php-fpm) root 99144 25.2 1.5 145672 60244 - R 17:28 3:31.73 php-fpm: pool nginx (php-fpm) root 36147 23.8 1.5 145672 59988 - S 17:30 3:02.19 php-fpm: pool nginx (php-fpm) root 63547 23.5 1.4 145672 57560 - S 18:10 1:02.18 php-fpm: pool nginx (php-fpm) root 58982 22.4 1.5 145672 62428 - S 17:18 5:35.43 php-fpm: pool nginx (php-fpm) root 12456 22.3 1.4 149320 58532 - R 17:40 1:20.88 php-fpm: pool nginx (php-fpm) root 33549 1.8 0.1 13604 3372 - SN 13:11 0:07.55 /bin/sh /var/db/rrd/updaterrd.sh root 82659 1.8 0.1 12944 2524 - SNC 18:15 0:00.00 sleep 60 unbound 91955 0.3 5.8 279240 234416 - Ss 13:10 3:39.22 /usr/local/sbin/unbound -c /var/unbound/unbound.conf
the
/var/log/nginx.log
file contains lots of entries like this one, and the UI has also just crashed:<171>1 2024-11-04T11:10:52.000000+00:00 xxx nginx - - - 2024/11/04 11:10:52 [error] 55002#100285: *45047 connect() to unix:/var/run/php-fpm.socket failed (61: Connection refused) while connecting to upstream, client: 2a02:xxxx, server: , request: "POST /widgets/widgets/wireguard.widget.php HTTP/2.0", upstream: "fastcgi://unix:/var/run/php-fpm.socket:", host: "xxx", referrer: "https://xxx/"
killing all the processes doesn't make a difference, they restart all quickly consuming all the CPU, removing the widget, but with a number 6 traffic graph entries on a 2 second update interval
ps aux | head -15 USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TT STAT STARTED TIME COMMAND root 11 167.8 0.0 0 32 - RNL Sun13 7421:53.96 [idle] root 49086 5.5 1.4 143624 55776 - SN 18:56 2:35.89 php-fpm: pool nginx (php-fpm) root 47810 4.0 1.5 143624 59864 - SN 18:56 2:35.81 php-fpm: pool nginx (php-fpm) ...
and the load average drops very quickly, add the widget back and almost instantly:
ps aux | head -15 USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TT STAT STARTED TIME COMMAND root 11 127.3 0.0 0 32 - RNL Sun13 7423:15.52 [idle] root 49086 22.1 1.4 147720 58132 - RN 18:56 2:43.39 php-fpm: pool nginx (php-fpm) root 48220 20.6 1.5 147720 58888 - RN 18:56 2:42.10 php-fpm: pool nginx (php-fpm) root 26035 19.7 1.4 145672 57036 - RN 19:10 0:18.81 php-fpm: pool nginx (php-fpm) root 49547 19.5 1.4 145736 57764 - RN 18:56 2:42.58 php-fpm: pool nginx (php-fpm) root 48034 15.8 1.5 145736 60856 - RN 18:56 2:40.26 php-fpm: pool nginx (php-fpm) root 9323 11.2 1.3 143624 53180 - RN 19:14 0:01.63 php-fpm: pool nginx (php-fpm) root 47810 10.6 1.5 143624 59928 - SN 18:56 2:40.64 php-fpm: pool nginx (php-fpm) root 50068 5.8 1.4 143688 58672 - RN 18:56 2:36.93 php-fpm: pool nginx (php-fpm) root 0 0.0 0.0 0 1168 - DLs Sun13 173:40.14 [kernel] ...
remove it again:
ps aux | head -15 USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TT STAT STARTED TIME COMMAND root 11 135.1 0.0 0 32 - RNL Sun13 7423:35.16 [idle] root 50068 13.1 1.5 145736 60276 - SN 18:56 2:45.20 php-fpm: pool nginx (php-fpm) root 26035 10.3 1.4 145672 57160 - SN 19:10 0:26.40 php-fpm: pool nginx (php-fpm) root 48034 9.5 1.5 143688 60584 - SN 18:56 2:47.49 php-fpm: pool nginx (php-fpm) root 49547 9.2 1.4 143688 56520 - SN 18:56 2:49.91 php-fpm: pool nginx (php-fpm) root 9323 9.0 1.4 145672 57680 - SN 19:14 0:07.45 php-fpm: pool nginx (php-fpm) root 49086 7.8 1.4 143624 55896 - SN 18:56 2:49.86 php-fpm: pool nginx (php-fpm) root 48220 4.0 1.4 143688 56608 - SN 18:56 2:47.47 php-fpm: pool nginx (php-fpm) root 0 0.0 0.0 0 1168 - DLs Sun13 173:40.48 [kernel] ...
adding a previously unused widget (i chose Thermal Sensors) did not trigger the issue:
ps aux | head -15 USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TT STAT STARTED TIME COMMAND root 11 173.6 0.0 0 32 - RNL Sun13 7425:00.90 [idle] root 48034 4.5 1.5 145736 62672 - SN 18:56 2:49.87 php-fpm: pool nginx (php-fpm) root 49086 4.4 1.4 143624 55968 - SN 18:56 2:51.68 php-fpm: pool nginx (php-fpm) root 50068 3.5 1.5 149320 60896 - SN 18:56 2:47.84 php-fpm: pool nginx (php-fpm) root 26035 3.1 1.4 145672 57428 - SN 19:10 0:28.53 php-fpm: pool nginx (php-fpm) root 9323 2.5 1.4 143688 55696 - SN 19:14 0:09.23 php-fpm: pool nginx (php-fpm) root 48220 1.7 1.4 143688 56688 - SN 18:56 2:49.76 php-fpm: pool nginx (php-fpm) root 49547 1.5 1.4 143688 56584 - SN 18:56 2:51.52 php-fpm: pool nginx (php-fpm) unbound 91955 0.7 5.8 279240 235984 - Ss 13:10 4:20.96 /usr/local/sbin/unbound -c /var/unbound/unbound.conf ...
so I changed the WireGuard Widget "Refresh Interval" which was at its default value
1
, setting it to10
and the CPU usage dropped with the widget present:ps aux | head -15 USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TT STAT STARTED TIME COMMAND root 11 152.4 0.0 0 32 - RNL Sun13 7428:59.53 [idle] root 71521 11.7 1.3 115608 51204 - SN 19:18 0:03.70 php-fpm: pool nginx (php-fpm) root 9323 9.2 1.4 149320 57984 - RN 19:14 0:25.05 php-fpm: pool nginx (php-fpm) root 85780 6.8 1.4 143624 54852 - SN 19:18 0:04.14 php-fpm: pool nginx (php-fpm) ...
changing it back to
1
pushed the CPU high again, and obviously dragged the load average with it!a quick check in the browser's network tab of the developer tool shows multiple outstanding
POST
requests into thewireguard_widget.php
, these requests are taking anywhere between 0.5 and 7 seconds to return, but mostly 3+ seconds, a value of3
for the Refresh Interval seems to be the bare minimum without driving the CPU highthis led me to re-read the release notes and there is a nod to refresh intervals: https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/15725 via https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/releases/24-11.html#dashboard but no other obvious WireGuard specific entry?
setting the value to
0
appears to cause the widget to bePOST
s to stop, as makes some sense...given the bug is cited as fixed, presumably the issue is purely (for me at least, not sure about the original poster) down to the 1 second interval not being sufficient for the server to respond hence requests backing up, overloading whatever is going on server side?
for the time being, i'll just drop the widget, but i do note that the WireGuard status via
status_wireguard.php
from the WireGuard Status page itself also takes circa 3 seconds to return, every other request duration on that page (scripts, stylesheets etc.) all return200
's in 1, 2 or 3ms, so very fasti presume something has been broken in this release?
-
@4e71 thanks for your detailled posting.
I disabled the wireguard widget ... and as long as I don't use the webGUI the load stays low ...Sure, I appreciate a fix also ;-)
-
We are looking at this....
-
This increase in CPU is the result of a bugfix for a related issue:
https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/15725I bumped the default refresh interval for all widgets after that went in, but I missed WireGuard. I've pushed a change that increases the interval for WireGuard as well to more closely match the previous behavior.
-
-
@marcosm thank you. looking forward to test that.
Is it coming via System-Patches or do I have to take it somewhere from bugzilla or so? -
-
There's no Wireguard widget on my 1100's dashboard, yet:
Dashboard has these widgets:
- Netgate Services And Support
- Service Status
- Disks
- ZDS
- System Information
- Gateways
- Interfaces
- UPS Summary
- pfBlockerNG
- Firewal Logs
-
@pfsjap It's possible other widgets are affecting it too. Remove all of them and re-add them one at a time to narrow down which one is doing it (if any).
-
-
I also see a higher CPU-Load (25% all the time) on my Hyper-V-VM. Doesn't seem to be related to the widgets much.
I run WireGuard a lot.
-
Hmm, odd. That shows only ~5% use. But also a 1.04 load average....
Are you able to catch anything else running and using CPU cycles?
-
24.11-RC now: still high load in dashboard. Looks the same to me in terms of this issue.
I will see if things change, the upgrade was only 15 minutes ago.EDIT: CPU load goes down now (in dashboard). I "minimized" all widgets, didn't have another idea ... load around 2.3 right now
-
The interval can be increased in the widget config. If you don't want the increased usage while on the dashboard, set them to refresh each e.g. 10s or remove them.
-
If you just run
top -HaSP
at the CLI without the webgui open are you still seeing increased CPU usage? -
No, the load is at 0.2 - 0.4 when I do that. The top-command shows no high php-fpm activity now, sure, when no webgui is used.
Didn't play with the widget intervals yet ... I'd prefer that these values come with a working default ;-) / sure, can test that laterEDIT: load went down while I typed this. now 0.04 for example: nice
EDIT 2: disabled all widgets except "System Information". CPU load now showing ~22%. load in top around 1.0
-
@sgw What would you consider to be a working default and for which widgets? Would the defaults be different when additional widgets are added (i.e. when there's increased processing requirements)? Would that be considered the same for all hardware?
-
@marcosm I didn't want to offend anybody. Thanks for your work ...
-
@sgw No worries. They are valid concerns and questions :)
-
@marcosm ok, great.
I don't know if I can tell which defaults to use etc / I can try to enable some of the widgets and see what happens, then try to adjust things.
I assume I had too many widgets enabled für the netgate 1100 ... maybe the base load increased over time and with newer releases? Would it help to configure php-fpm somehow (more memory, more threads or something)?
Do the widgets get refreshed also when they are minimized?