• Are there any plans to integrate PF tables in pfSense? (see http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/tables.html)

    For those that aren't familiar with PF's built-in tables feature..

    "A table is used to hold a group of IPv4 and/or IPv6 addresses. Lookups against a table are very fast and consume less memory and processor time than lists. For this reason, a table is ideal for holding a large group of addresses as the lookup time on a table holding 50,000 addresses is only slightly more than for one holding 50 addresses."

    I've used this extensively in *BSD – it works well. This would be a big improvement in pfSense, as the UI for massive amounts of block rules (i.e. blacklisting much of AP/AFRNIC) quickly clutters in the firewall rules section -- let alone the perfomance increase that is gained.

  • Something else then "Firewall –> Aliases" ?

  • @GruensFroeschli:

    Something else then "Firewall –> Aliases" ?

    Yes, something very different.

    Please read the PF documentation, namely the section on PF Tables as I linked above to digest this core feature of PF.

  • If you run

    pfctl -vvs Tables

    in the Diagnostics…Command Prompt you will see pfSense is using tables.  Now having better functionality so you can add your own would be nice.  I too come from OBSD...

    Aliases is an option, but better table support is the "right" way to do it  ;)