Wireguard interface assignment II
-
Hi,
about 2 years ago I tried to setup a site-2-site VPN with WG between pfSense and a Fritzbox.
But due the to weird Fritzbox WG implementation I dismissed that after several fails and continued to use IPsec.
Now I have a new site with a new Fritzbox and again I am trying to setup WG.
But I stuck at one point: as far as I remember during my trials 2 years ago, I was able to use for both tunnels the same interface assignment:
But now I cant set the VPNWG on tun_wg1 too, no chance.
Do I remembering wrong?
Or was there change in pfSense/WG package?Regards
-
@FSC830 said in Wireguard interface assignment II:
I was able to use for both tunnels the same interface assignment
What both tunnels, you said you want to create one Tunnel, the other is IPSec.
-
Hi, thanks for reply.
Both WG tunnels (tun_wg0/tun_wg1).
No IPsec in the screenshot.Tunnel tun_wg0 is used for all my mobile peers and runs without issues.
Now I want to create a 2nd WG tunnel (tun_wg1) to a remote Fritzbox as site-2-site connection.Regards
-
@FSC830 Then I wouldn't use the same interface for that in the first place. pfsense will route no problem if a mobile device needs to access something behind the fritzbox.
-
Hi again,
to be honest: I guess, I did not remember exactly what I did 2 years ago.
May I was mistaken by the interface name opt2 because the SG-3100 has a physical port OPT1 and I mixed up physical and virtual names.
The goal was to use 2 different tunnels, one for the mobile clients and one for the site-2-site connection.
And now all is running in that way
.Regards
