• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
Netgate Discussion Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

How secure is Captive portal?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Captive Portal
3 Posts 3 Posters 4.0k Views
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S
    spd21
    last edited by Feb 2, 2011, 11:22 AM

    Hi All,

    Prelude

    A little while ago I was tasked with deploying secure WiFi.

    Soon after I came to a realisation that there is only 2 ways you can go with this

    Wifi + SSL authentication
    Wifi + Captive portal (CP)

    SSL authentication does not fit my specification so I had to go captive portal > pfsense

    My implementation is now complete, I have wifi gateways that authenticate clients via CP, with a radius server pointed to AD. So all my WiFi traffic is routed through pfsense and thus Lan services can be firewalled.
    Security is managed in 3 ways.

    1. Wifi Association
    2. CP Authentication
    3. Access restriction (Firewall)

    Question:

    In my understanding when a client authenticates with CP its mac address is added to a list of allowed addresses through CP. But if I can associate with a network I can ARP for MACs and spoof my mac. What then?

    Thank you.

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • C
      cmb
      last edited by Feb 11, 2011, 3:55 AM

      It's as secure as you're going to get at the gateway level. Your infrastructure at layer 2 (switch and/or AP) has to handle any other bad things that people try to do as that's beyond the firewall's control.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • C
        capnsteve
        last edited by Feb 18, 2011, 3:13 PM

        @cmb:

        It's as secure as you're going to get at the gateway level. Your infrastructure at layer 2 (switch and/or AP) has to handle any other bad things that people try to do as that's beyond the firewall's control.

        +1 - Get better switches

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • First post
          Last post
        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.
          [[user:consent.lead]]
          [[user:consent.not_received]]