IPv6?

cmb

I'm sorry but I still can't see much use for IPv6 right now…
Can you enlighten me on what we could gain from it nowadays?

read the wikipedia article linked above, explains it well.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPv6

the just of it is:
more addresses
encryption as a requirement, rather than an add-on (IPsec on everything)
elimination of NAT, which is an ugly "solution" to the problem of IP address shortage, or a solution to avoiding the cost of public IP's

rds_correia

Hi cmb,
I'm plenty aware of what IPv6 is ;).
My point here is, how can it be usefull nowadays that there's almost nothing using IPv6.
We're all still using IPv4, so if it were to be implemented in pfSense what would we gain from it?
Cheers

Alien

@rds_correia:

We're all still using IPv4, so if it were to be implemented in pfSense what would we gain from it?

Experience and Users.
Experience: IPv6 will come (nobody knows when this will be). But what's more important is, that things like IPsec become backported.
There will be no switchday. Nobody will say: Now IPv4 is death and IPv6 is here. It will take much time to change. I'm not sure, if IPv4 will die anytime. IPv6 will coexist many, many years and the change already begun.

Users: Many IPv6-Users prefer BSD (as I said: It is the most advanced IPv6-platform). There are many people, that would be happy to see, that pfSense supports IPv6. More and more people get interedted in this protocol. And that's a fact (see usergroup, google for IPv6-infosites, see userstatistics of sixxs or other IPv6-projects, …). The community isn't small..

sullrich

Well the IPV6 reference platform is Kame which is heavily sync'd to the bsd's.

In fact the IPV6 project was recently announced that their goals have been met!

This is a good thing, IPv6 seems to be great, and as I have never used it, I welcome the overlord.

:)

Scott

rds_correia

Hmm, ok seeing it from the "experience" side of things I'd say it would be nice to have IPv6 on pfS.
Anyway I still don't see it as a major feature needed ASAP.
Cheers

rical

If you want to integrate IPv6 you will have to change pfsense to a more flexible product right now wich means deep and major changes… Let's plan for a 2.0 or 3.0 release :-). Also remember the first goals of the project and the actual complexity of Ipv6 use. For "powerUsers" I suggest FreeBSD or OpenBSD as IPv6 gateways.
For the soekris and others note that IPv6 (crypto and stuff) may be too "ressource consumming"...

Alien

I'm not saying it has to be done yet.
I see that it is (at this time) much more to work at IPv4.
But with BSD as platform I think it would be a cool feature.

I just want you to make you think about IPv6…

Alien

Sorry for doubleposting.
Is kame supported in pfSense?
Then I don't think, that it would be very difficult to do this: http://www.sixxs.net/faq/connectivity/?faq=usingsubnet&os=kame.router

I'm sorry… I have not very much experience with routers/networks. But I don't think, that it would be too difficult to create a package with a small package with a gui for this.

Sorry, if this is nonsense!

EDIT:
@ "Why do we need IPv6 (yet)?"
I think it's more a question of supporting it.
If there are more services/more software then it's IPv6-time.
IPv6 brings answers on problems like NATs/Ipv6 and VoIP.

sullrich

Kame is supported but I think you discount how hard that modifying all of the screens and backend truly are.

billm

@sullrich:

Kame is supported but I think you discount how hard that modifying all of the screens and backend truly are.

No kidding shudder

–Bill