• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
Netgate Discussion Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

Captive Portal in front of DSLAMS DSL users all access

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Captive Portal
3 Posts 2 Posters 1.9k Views
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • G
    gimpel
    last edited by May 3, 2011, 5:46 AM

    I have a Captive Portal box sitting in front of an DSLAM.
    Effectively, if 1 user logs in to captive portal behind a dsl modem in routing/nat mode, then ALL users in the house can access the internet.

    I need somehow without using bridged mode, to have the Captive Portal pick up some information from the client to allow 1 login per system… not 1 login per dsl modem.

    I don't care if it is a mac address, or an ip, or username, but it has to be something so that 1 person in the household logging in doesn't open captive portal for everyone.

    The only answer I've heard this far is 'use bridge mode' but that won't work, as it'll kill all firewalling for everybody.

    any other ideas?

    thank you much,
    Gimpel

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • G
      gimpel
      last edited by May 3, 2011, 5:50 AM

      I've read this
      http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,4264.0.html

      and I'm thinking that what I'm proposing based on this simply won't work.

      does anyone know if dsl modems can NOT nat and yet route, or pass mac addresses from clients without being in bridge mode?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • J
        jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
        last edited by May 4, 2011, 10:46 PM

        Captive portal works at layer 2 (read: MAC address), so unless your clients are bridged to the same layer 2 network as pfSense, and pfSense can see the client MAC addresses directly, then it will not do what you are after.

        We have a feature request open (not sure if it's on redmine or elsewhere) for a layer 3 captive portal that would work by IP, but it's something that requires quite a lot of time toward (and funding…) in order for it to happen.

        Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

        Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

        Do not Chat/PM for help!

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        3 out of 3
        • First post
          3/3
          Last post
        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.
          This community forum collects and processes your personal information.
          consent.not_received