{Complete} Timebased Rules

[sullrich]

Please try creating schedules at least 30 minutes apart.  If these work then I have a hunch of what is going on.

[heiko]

i will test it

[heiko]

It is not working.

The Test:

• first i created 2 schedules with 30 min. apart –> Screenshot

• i created a blocking rule to block icmp traffic to www.heise.de without a schedule. I saved it and it works, no ping replys, i disabled the rule and reset the states, the ping reply and all was good....!

• Then i edited this blocking rule and choose a schedule - the activate time were not reached -, so the ping should be answered, but nothing happens. Here i waited for 20 minutes, but alsio nothing happens.

• I edited and saved the schedule and rule a second time, but also nothing happens...

• The Test Box is a real box not a virtual machine

I capitulate, in my opinion, anywhere is a "bug".
Please duplicate.
Greetings
Heiko

[heiko]

Morning i am in irc with hoba again.
greetings heiko

Then i post it back or hoba

[heiko]

Sdale: thanks for the really pretty gui. It looks now fine

[sullrich]

Please test a new snapshot about 2 hours from now.

Thanks to Hoba for translating.

[heiko]

i´m tired ;D

i will test it in a few hours, i´m taking with hoba tonight in irc…..

[heiko]

Hello sdale,
look at the screenshot. I think a "missing text" is in the notification…

I don´t know. Can you duplicate this behaiour?

1.) I have a schedule on the rule.
2.) If i edit and save the rule and change the schedule to "none"
3.) I´m going immediate to the schedules, delete the schedule.
4.) The schedule is away. OK, but the notifaction above comes up...

Thanks

[heiko]

Hello Scott,
sorry, sorry, sorry, it runs not for me. I think, we need tonnight another IRC-session and a dry wine. ;) The behaviour is same as yesterday. Before the test, i updated to the newest snapshot.

[yoda715]

@heiko:

Hello sdale,
look at the screenshot. I think a "missing text" is in the notification…

I don´t know. Can you duplicate this behaiour?

1.) I have a schedule on the rule.
2.) If i edit and save the rule and change the schedule to "none"
3.) I´m going immediate to the schedules, delete the schedule.
4.) The schedule is away. OK, but the notifaction above comes up...

Thanks

Put a description in the firewall rule and it should show.

[heiko]

Ah yes, superb

[heiko]

OK, that runs, the rule description says (not parsed). Would it be better with "parsed for schedules" ?

[sullrich]

The description is for the firewall operator only.  Nowhere do we use that data besides displaying it for the firewall operator.

[heiko]

Thanks scott

[heiko]

Hello guys,
a cracking good story :D. At first, thanks for all. I made a "short" test at the morning, and the blocking rule roooooooccccccksssss…. :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D

Today-Tonight, i will a make a complete test. I think, i meets HOBA tonight in irc and we can discuss the outcomes.

Thanks, Thanks all of the pfsense Coding and Testingteam!!!

Heiko

[heiko]

Hello Scott,
now i am testing, we have a few problems with multiple rules in the rulebase, i think. When i meets HOBA in IRC we discuss the problem….
Greetings
heiko

[heiko]

Hello Scott´s, Hello hoba (have fun with the goodie!)
Yesterday the test with multiple rules in the rulebase was successful. I´m very happy about this, but to be on the safe side, i needed a final test tonight, so if this succeeds, we can knock it out…..:D
Greetings
heiko

[heiko]

Hello,
many many thanks.

Now, it it finished. My final test was successful, we can knock it out….

Great Job, Scott, Scott and Hoba and all the other people from the pfsense team

I think, it is a killer feature for the business. In a few days a write a tutorial with wink,

Thanks a lot
Heiko

-->Scott, now we can arrange the portknocking feature :).

[sullrich]

Yay!  Sounds good.

[heiko]

Great project!