ESXi 5.0: Benefit from Assigning NIC's directly to pfSense VM using VT-D/IOMMU?
mattlach last edited by
I currently have my system set up as follows:
AMD Zacate E-350 8GB RAM
Intel EXPI9402PTBLK dual port PCI-e gigabit server NIC
Broadcom NetXtreme (BCM5761) PCI-e Single Port server NIC
Shitty on board Realtek 8111C is disabled
VM1: Ubuntu Linux NAS /general linux server
Network is currently set up as follows:
Internet (Verizon FiOS) -> Intel Port 0 -> ESXi Vswitch 0 -> pfSense VM -> ESXi Vswitch 1 -> Intel Port 1 -> physical LAN Switch.
Nothing else touches the vSwitches above. I dedicate them to pfsense.
physical LAN Switch -> NetXTreme NIC -> Vswitch 2 -> Linux NAS/General Server and ESXi Management Console
My theory here is that I don't want heavy NAS traffic interfearing with other clients outside network speeds.
I have this theory that ESXi VM overhead involved in the Vswitches may introduce some network latencies, but I ahve no idea how much.
Would I benefit from running this on a system that supports VT-D/IOMMU and direct IO mapping the Intel NIC to the pfSense VM, or would the difference be small and unnoticable?
tritron last edited by
I had found that esxi had very slow network performance. I had switched to xen and my speeds increased 5 times. Pefrormance of xen is much faster then esxi. So if you assign network interfance performance will improve.
cylent last edited by
now you tell me
i chose esxi for simplicity.
so you're saying now xen is faster?
"I had found that esxi had very slow network performance"
What do you consider slow?
I am seeing 800Mbps + testing with iperf, and 70+ MBps file copies from guest os to my workstation on esxi 5 running on a cheap ass N40L box
Now what is odd, is I see 400mbps to pfsense with iperf. But since its only got a 20mbps internet connection doesn't really matter that much ;)
gibby916 last edited by
I'm running pfSesne on ESXi with excellent performance. Yes the default networking built into ESXi isn't extremely robust, but there is not an issue with network latency that I am running into whatsoever. Not taking anything away from Xen, but I would go with whatever you are most comfortable with.
CDeLorme last edited by
I just setup Xen and my file transfer speeds over LAN range from 70-130MBps with an average above 80, which doesn't sound much different from ESXi reports here.
I tried a passed through NIC with near-identical performance (80-115 MBps with an average of 90). I don't see enough of a difference to justify passthrough, but I haven't tested long term stability yet so maybe there is more to it.
I am using consumer hardware, so my biggest problem with ESXi was the lack of drivers, I had two boards with Broadcom chipsets that weren't supported without modifying the install CD.