Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Intel 82574L looses to Realtek RTL8111E Ethernet

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
    25 Posts 12 Posters 28.6k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • N
      n2qcn
      last edited by

      Ha, got you to click. yea, there is no data here, but on paper the RTL8111E is better than the 82574L. It uses less power, has hardware  ECC and CRC and an over all more modern design. (well it is a newer chip by years) And its directly supported in any of the 2.1 shapshots, so why do people keep insisting on intel nics?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • A
        asterix
        last edited by

        @n2qcn:

        so why do people keep insisting on intel nics?

        Good question.. Its like how Apple fan boys keep insisting iPhone is better than Samsung Galaxy S3/S4… when a lot of them know its not true  ;)

        While building a pfSense UTM, folks are looking for the best hardware and many have kept using Intel cards instead of Realtek as no one likes to be a guinea pig. I myself used Realtek for quiet some time and never had a single issue in performance. But then again, FreeBSD supports Intel cards over Realtek. Newer versions have the drivers for Realtek but not all the new ones.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • AhnHELA
          AhnHEL
          last edited by

          Its more of a matter of history.  Realtek chipsets were junk back in the 10/100 days.  From what I've gathered and even personal experience, their gigabit chipsets have not had the problems that gave Realtek such a bad name in the first place.  Also, as Asterix stated, Intel is still more widely supported among BSD releases.

          My NC9C-550 uses RTL8111E and its been rock solid.

          AhnHEL (Angel)

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • ?
            A Former User
            last edited by

            i tend to disagree with posts #2 and part of #3.

            i have Tested the 8111E in the lab extensively on different mobo mfg's motherboards and find they Bottleneck
            LONG before the Intel Nics do. you have to understand (especially in where im employed) that with Gig-E links
            at 80% utilization 24/7 , the 8111E just cant hack it 24/7 before we see crashes from the NIC… i could barely
            push 60% utilization down a 8111E throat and i could easily make it crash... understand the tests in the lab are
            (like Realworld in Datacenters and warehouses and our offices) are done FULL duplex.

            Yes Realtek has a bad history from the 10/100 days but its NOT much better now. im tired of having to deal
            with this JUNK and having the management want us to to test  the newest mobo from our distributors and they show
            up with these junk Nics onboard the mobo. (and these systems are cheaper cost wise but we cant afford ANY down
            time in the enterprise i work in)

            ive had better luck with Broadcom than i have had with Realtek. at least we dont see crashes from the Nics from
            broadcom hardware even though i dont have even one machine deployed in our enterprise that has Realtek on it.

            so from my perspective (in a Million Dollar plus Enterprise) , we cant sacrifice downtime...Downtime costs us severely
            so we stick with the Same system's that are ROCK solid and they all Feature Intel on the mobo...

            also of Note. I am a apple fanboy as you want to call it, i have LOTS of mac and a iPad or 2... BUT I dislike the iphone
            .. i have 2 macs on my desk at work (4 monitor'd Mac Pro and a MacBookPro (Non Retina)
            and at home im worse... more macs.. NOT a pc to be seen... the iphone/ipad has problems with Wifi for SURE and i
            can see it at work. (employees have have the right to use there wifi devices on our network (isolated of course) and we field
            probably 20 calls a day about my apple iphone or ipad doesnt connect to the network... apple has a mess on there hands
            with some of the ipads and ALL of the iphones... Wished work didnt have the allowing employees to bring wifi devices and use
            them on the network at work but its not my call... only certain iPads seem to have wifi issues.

            in the lab ive tested IOS 6.1.2 LONG before anybody else had access to it, and its Better on our network but theres still issues..
            and im sure 6.1.3 will break the fixes in 6.1.2

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • stephenw10S
              stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
              last edited by

              @n2qcn:

              Ha, got you to click.

              Bah!  ::)

              @SunCatalyst:

              Yes Realtek has a bad history from the 10/100 days but its NOT much better now.

              I have to disagree with this, the Gigabit Realtek NICs are much better than, say, the RTL8139. However that's not saying much because:

              The RealTek 8139 PCI NIC redefines the meaning of 'low end.' This is probably the worst PCI ethernet controller ever made…

              If you have 8139 NICs you cannot assume they will stay 'up' under pfSense. They may just stop working. The gigabit NICs may bottleneck at less than 1Gbps but they are at least reliable, in my experience.

              The Intel 82574L is an old NIC, yes, but because of that it's probably more widely used and tested than almost anything else. It has now been replaced by the Intel I350/340 (I'm not really up to speed on those yet). The number one reason why Intel NICs are recommended though is that Intel contribute the drivers to FreeBSD. I gurantee there will be (or already are) drivers for the I350 NICs for FreeBSD. I cannot say the same for new Realtek NICs.

              Steve

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • A
                asterix
                last edited by

                Yup.. it all comes down to how good or bad the drivers are written for any NIC.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • E
                  elgo
                  last edited by

                  As a matter of fact, I'm actually experiencing a living hell with Realtek RTL 8111EVL (onboard NICs on NF9D-2700 mobo) and pfsense 2.1 beta…
                  Keep getting "watchdog timeout" underload and can't get NICs back to working state unless rebooting.

                  Had no problem with previous "older" realtek gigabit chips.
                  And Intel is no 100% magic that will works in all cases. Recent epic fail demonstrate this.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • T
                    tim.mcmanus
                    last edited by

                    @elgo:

                    And Intel is no 100% magic that will works in all cases. Recent epic fail demonstrate this.

                    Especially if the motherboard manufacturer doesn't follow the design / implementation specs.  :)

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • stephenw10S
                      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                      last edited by

                      Yep, bad third party code can kill anything.  ;)

                      Steve

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • ?
                        A Former User
                        last edited by

                        bad Code does hurt products and in that case , Intel didnt do the right thing and release
                        the patch for everybody to apply to that particular Motherboard … was limited to that one
                        motherboard from the certain MFG for NOW...that case was the MFG fault for not programming
                        the EEPROM with correct contents.

                        now with Realtek... its a Hardware problem. i have well over 150+ servers
                        siting on pallets in the back room of the lab with different models of RealTek nic's in them..
                        they all fail in one sort or another or fall flat on there faces.

                        also of interesting note... i also have another 2 pallets full of servers as well that failed
                        the lab tests for different reasons and SOME of them have intel nics and Broadcom nics...

                        all 3 of these pallets of equipment is destined to be destroyed by our corp policy..

                        everything is tested extensively for 90 days in the lab (under our realworld data tests) and
                        decided whether to deploy it or not.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • stephenw10S
                          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                          last edited by

                          That's some fairly extensive testing, I guess uptime is really important to you,  ;)

                          You've clearly tested more hardware than I have probably ever seen!

                          Steve

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • ?
                            A Former User
                            last edited by

                            we have a 99.9% uptime requirement… with the exception of the fiasco of the boss
                            that moved us to Cisco without testing in the lab first, we have had 100% uptime
                            but we have built redundancy into every possible place.

                            my budget just for testing new machines each year is around 1Million Dollars...

                            Budget on what ive already spent this year on new hardware to deploy...
                            1 Million in new hardware...

                            but you have to consider we have:

                            8 warehouses around the world we ship from (7 of the warehouses are in the US)
                            equipment in 20 DataCenters around the world
                            20 office buildings full of employees taking orders 24/7

                            its a shame that all the equipment that fails our tests (that is BRAND new) gets
                            destroyed but its corp policy.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • T
                              tirsojrp
                              last edited by

                              @SunCatalyst:

                              its a shame that all the equipment that fails our tests (that is BRAND new) gets
                              destroyed but its corp policy

                              Used to work under similar rules, discarded equipment is destroyed, at least 99% is fully working equipment that should be donated.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • stephenw10S
                                stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                last edited by

                                @SunCatalyst:

                                my budget just for testing new machines each year is around 1Million Dollars…

                                :o OK
                                I'll upgrade my earlier statement to 'definitely more hardware than I've ever seen'.

                                Steve

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • M
                                  margen
                                  last edited by

                                  I've used 3 RealTek 8139 10/100BaseTX NICs (2 WAN in failover + 1 LAN) for the past 3-4 years. It's a very old non-server platform that mostly does NAT for 30-40 clients and barely pushes the 100/100 mbit WAN to its limit, and not for longer than a couple of hours a day. The office-hours utilization would be around 30/30 mbit on average.

                                  It's nothing like the above scenarios, but still I have to say that I have NEVER experienced any problems with the NICs. Before I had to upgrade to 2.0.2 I logged over 1 year uptime.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • ?
                                    A Former User
                                    last edited by

                                    i have to agree that the equipment should be donated somewhere or resold… not destroyed...

                                    MOST of our Gigabit connections are at about 80% utilization (which is really damn close to
                                    what the physical hardware can transmit on the wire after the tcp stack).

                                    we HAVE to have systems that dont fail under the load or crash... currently looking for 10GE Nics at the
                                    moment to get some relief as our traffic gets to be more and more each year...
                                    10Ge seems to be ALOT thinner pickings that are supported under FreeBSD 8.3 (pfsense 2.1 Beta)

                                    and i DOUBT we will be running intel Nics at 10GE..

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • D
                                      dhatz
                                      last edited by

                                      @SunCatalyst:

                                      MOST of our Gigabit connections are at about 80% utilization (which is really damn close to
                                      what the physical hardware can transmit on the wire after the tcp stack).

                                      we HAVE to have systems that dont fail under the load or crash… currently looking for 10GE Nics at the
                                      moment to get some relief as our traffic gets to be more and more each year...
                                      10Ge seems to be ALOT thinner pickings that are supported under FreeBSD 8.3 (pfsense 2.1 Beta)

                                      and i DOUBT we will be running intel Nics at 10GE..

                                      Have you considered configuring 2 x GbE ports in LACP ? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Link_aggregation

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • ?
                                        A Former User
                                        last edited by

                                        we have thought about it BUT…... most of our uplink providers DONT support it..
                                        OR its cheaper to do 10GE drop to us and having to have redundancy built into
                                        everything , that complicates stuff tremendously

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • D
                                          dhatz
                                          last edited by

                                          Well FreeBSD-HEAD (what will eventually become FreeBSD 10) has recently updated drivers for several 10 GbE NICs, such as Chelsio, Emulex and Intel. I'm not sure how much of that code has been backported to FreeBSD 8.x though …

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • P
                                            phil.davis
                                            last edited by

                                            @SunCatalyst - I volunteer with an organisation in Nepal - www.inf.org - we have nothing like "western country" bandwidths available, just getting WiMax technology in the last few months with Nepal Telecom guaranteeing >1Mbps to corporate customers! We get our first WiMax connection on Monday. We are not going to saturate any ethernet chip any time soon, so equipment that has some obscure high-performance issue is no big deal. If your corporate has a change of heart, please PM me. We have fund-raising offices in various countries and can easily accept donations of electronics equipment and get it out to Nepal.

                                            As the Greek philosopher Isosceles used to say, "There are 3 sides to every triangle."
                                            If I helped you, then help someone else - buy someone a gift from the INF catalog http://secure.inf.org/gifts/usd/

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.