Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Can resolve names OK, can't pass traffic otherwise to OPT1 (wireless)

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Firewalling
    10 Posts 3 Posters 3.1k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • N
      nickz
      last edited by

      Hi,

      I've worked with pfSense a few times for work, quite successfully (making an OpenVPN router) and that's great.  Thanks for that, guys,  ;).  However, now I am trying to configure pfSense for my self an a few neighbors and am having trouble, probably due to my own ignorance as pfSense is very intuitive and well-designed!

      My pfSense box is a Soekris box with a wireless NIC in it.  I am running 1.2-RC2 embedded.  It seems to work fine.  For my test network, I have a mac computer sharing its internet connection to the LAN.  On the pfSense box, I have bridged the LAN interface to the WAN interface and have enabled the filtering bridge.  The pfSense box is connecting via its WAN port.  I don't know if this is right, but in production, there will be no wired LAN and this was the only way I could find to let the box run with the LAN port disconnected.  So from the pfSense box, I can ping the internet just fine from the LAN and WAN interfaces.  When I try to ping from the OPT1 interface (Wireless) I cannot ping past the interfaces.

      Now, if I take a wireless laptop, and connect to my WLAN/OPT1 on the pfSense box, (which works flawlessly), I can bring up the admin web pages just fine.  If I try to ping, or other wise go past the box, I get 'host unreachable errors' or somesuch.  However, I can resolve names using nslookup on the laptop from OPT1.

      My rules are very relaxed [ *  *  *  *  *  *] on all three interfaces (LAN,WAN,OPT1) for now.  I've tried disabling the firewall altogether and I still can't get traffic to actually pass to OPT1 from the internet , even though I can resolve names.

      So something is getting through, I just need an education in either rules or routing and I will be very grateful.

      Thank you all very much! –  ;D

      Nick

      Yeager: "I'm taking her up for testing.  Any objections?"
      Tower: "No sir.  No objections.  You are clear to taxi."
      Tower: ("He must have clearance, right?" "Yeah sure, he must.  It's here someplace…")

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • GruensFroeschliG
        GruensFroeschli
        last edited by

        take a look at
        http://pfsense.trendchiller.com/transparent_firewall.pdf

        as i understand your setup is something like this:

        bridged
                                        /             
        next-hop –------WAN---pfSense-----LAN
                                                    ____ OPT1

        Clients on your LAN need as Gateway the IP of your next Hop.
        Clients on your OPT1 need as Gateway the IP of your pfSense on OPT1.

        Or could you post a figure as how your network should look if the above picture is wrong.

        We do what we must, because we can.

        Asking questions the smart way: http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • N
          nickz
          last edited by

          @GruensFroeschli:

          take a look at
          http://pfsense.trendchiller.com/transparent_firewall.pdf

          as i understand your setup is something like this:

          bridged
                                          /             
          next-hop –------WAN---pfSense-----LAN
                                                      ____ OPT1

          Clients on your LAN need as Gateway the IP of your next Hop.
          Clients on your OPT1 need as Gateway the IP of your pfSense on OPT1.

          Or could you post a figure as how your network should look if the above picture is wrong.

          Yes, your picture is correct, thank you, and my OPT1 clients are using the ip of OPT1 as default gateway. What else could be missing?  This is so close, I just can't quite get it to work.  AFAIK, I am following the pdf, making the proper interface substitutions. Thanks, Gruens.  –Nick

          Yeager: "I'm taking her up for testing.  Any objections?"
          Tower: "No sir.  No objections.  You are clear to taxi."
          Tower: ("He must have clearance, right?" "Yeah sure, he must.  It's here someplace…")

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • S
            sullrich
            last edited by

            Make sure you are on 1.2-RC1.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • N
              nickz
              last edited by

              @sullrich:

              Make sure you are on 1.2-RC1.

              Will do.  Thank you very much.  Will I be able to restore my config. from RC2?
              Nick

              Yeager: "I'm taking her up for testing.  Any objections?"
              Tower: "No sir.  No objections.  You are clear to taxi."
              Tower: ("He must have clearance, right?" "Yeah sure, he must.  It's here someplace…")

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • S
                sullrich
                last edited by

                RC1 or better.  If you are already on RC2 then you are on the latest.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • N
                  nickz
                  last edited by

                  Thank you, Scott.  Have tried both RC1 and RC2.  Still can't ping past the pfSense box, although nslookup works.  Any help/pointers appreciated.

                  Thanks,
                  Nick

                  Yeager: "I'm taking her up for testing.  Any objections?"
                  Tower: "No sir.  No objections.  You are clear to taxi."
                  Tower: ("He must have clearance, right?" "Yeah sure, he must.  It's here someplace…")

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • S
                    sullrich
                    last edited by

                    Enable advanced outbound NAT in Firewall -> NAT.  Click Save.  Does it work now?

                    Also, did you add a rule to OPTX permitting everything to test?

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • N
                      nickz
                      last edited by

                      Hi Scott,

                      I enabled advanced outbound NAT in Firewall -> NAT and saved.  Still no change.  Now I do have a Firewall rule for OPT1 that is:
                      [ *  *  *  *  *  *    ].  Is that right?

                      Also, in Firewall > NAT > Outbound, I created a rule:
                      [ WAN  192.168.3.0/24  *  *  *  *  *  NO] (Similar to the auto-created rule for LAN) where 192.168.3.0/24 is my OPT1 subnet.  Am I on the right track?

                      Thank you

                      Yeager: "I'm taking her up for testing.  Any objections?"
                      Tower: "No sir.  No objections.  You are clear to taxi."
                      Tower: ("He must have clearance, right?" "Yeah sure, he must.  It's here someplace…")

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • N
                        nickz
                        last edited by

                        OK, some progress!  ;)  Since I am bridging LAN to WAN, I created an Advanced, NAT, Outbound Rule like this:
                        [ LAN    192.168.3.0/24  *  *  *  *  *  NO] where 192.168.3.0.24 is my OPT1 Subnet.  I can now ping from OPT1 to the internet via the GUI.  Now to just get that working on a client machine associated to OPT1.  Thanks in advance.

                        NickZ

                        Yeager: "I'm taking her up for testing.  Any objections?"
                        Tower: "No sir.  No objections.  You are clear to taxi."
                        Tower: ("He must have clearance, right?" "Yeah sure, he must.  It's here someplace…")

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.