Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Carp problems in testing releases

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    HA/CARP/VIPs
    5
    22
    11.8k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • J
      JanZ
      last edited by

      @sullrich:

      Known bug.  Update to a snapshot release:  http://www.pfsense.com/~sullrich/1.0-BETA1-TESTING-SNAPSHOT-2-8-06/

      I did full upgrade from 2-5-06 to 2-8-06, but problem is still there. Do you recommend full install?

      /jan

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • H
        hoba
        last edited by

        We alway recommend a fresh full install from scratch if problems that should be fixed are still there after an upgrade.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • J
          JanZ
          last edited by

          @hoba:

          We alway recommend a fresh full install from scratch if problems that should be fixed are still there after an upgrade.

          Did a fresh install and things got a little bit better.

          Now carp interfaces are not in INIT state, but in BACKUP (on primary node).

          Well, let me explain, what is going on here:

          two nodes, pf1 and pf2 (pf1 is primary).

          one carp IP on WAN (physical WAN) and 3 carp IP's on VLAN interfaces.

          After fresh install, same thing happened, WAN carp interface is MASTER on both nodes, other carp interfaces are in backup state on pf1 (primary) and in master state on pf2.

          Soon after boot, advskew on all interfaces on pf1 is 0 and 100 on pf2 (which is correct). Then, after some time (20 -30 seconds) advskew on pf1 goes to 200 and on pf2 remains 100. Supress.carp value on pf1 goes to something higher than 0 and if I disable and enable carp on pf1 then all goes to INIT (unless WAN carp interface, that goes to "secondary master").

          I tried to delete all carp interfaces, reboot the nodes and create them from scratch… when I create carp interface on WAN, synchronisation works well and it appears on pf2 without any problem. With only one interface setup is perfectly working. When I add another carp interface on any VLAN, strange things starts to happen, like I described earlier.

          Any idea?

          Thnx, /jan

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • S
            sullrich
            last edited by

            Ran into this today.  If the interfaces are not plugged in (linked up) then you're ips will come up in the state of INIT.

            Do you have all the interfaces plugged up?

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • J
              JanZ
              last edited by

              @sullrich:

              Ran into this today.  If the interfaces are not plugged in (linked up) then you're ips will come up in the state of INIT.

              Do you have all the interfaces plugged up?

              Yup, all interfaces plugged… WAN is on copper 100TX, all VLANS are on LAN, that is on fiber 1000TX.

              All connected and running...

              /jan

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • S
                sullrich
                last edited by

                Then the only thing I can think of is that you need to make sure that an ip on the same carp subnet exists on a real interface.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • J
                  JanZ
                  last edited by

                  @sullrich:

                  Then the only thing I can think of is that you need to make sure that an ip on the same carp subnet exists on a real interface.

                  I have no IP on physical LAN interface, only on VLAN's. If I do ifconfig -a in shell, there is no IP on physical LAN, I see no need for that, because I run VLAN's there and it is a trunk port… anything wrong with that?

                  /jan

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • J
                    JanZ
                    last edited by

                    Now I have BETA2 and things got a little bit better… but still, when I create carp interface on primary, it syncs to secondary and after that advskew on primary goes to 200 and becomes backup (wrong).

                    How do I enable debugging and/or logging to file, what scripts are really doing in background?

                    Thnx, /jan

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • J
                      JanZ
                      last edited by

                      OK, gang… fixed.

                      I just pulled out Intel dual FC giga-ethernet card, installed normal intel 100BaseTX card, re-assigned properly all interfaces and we are back online, up&running without any trouble.

                      Seems, that there were some errors on card (or GBIC, or port on a switch), that raised net.inet.carp.suppress_preempt value > 0

                      Thnx for all help, I just thought you might want to hear, what was wrong...

                      Keep up with good work, /jan

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • J
                        JanZ
                        last edited by

                        Well, can't sleep before I come to an end when issue arise…

                        Here are some answers to my problem with CARP, VLAN and em driver:

                        http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=25292+0+/usr/local/www/db/text/2005/freebsd-net/20050424.freebsd-net+raw

                        Do you think this could be included in pfsense distro?

                        Thnx, /jan

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • S
                          sullrich
                          last edited by

                          Have you asked someone to MFC those patches to RELENG_6?  I would rather not add any more custom patches to our current roster.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • J
                            JanZ
                            last edited by

                            @sullrich:

                            Have you asked someone to MFC those patches to RELENG_6?   I would rather not add any more custom patches to our current roster.

                            I already opened a support ticket on Intel, they was not able to reproduce the problem, so they wanted me to send them full TCP dump, but now I sent them that link, we'll see, what can be done.

                            /jan

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • N
                              NAmorim
                              last edited by

                              I have two nodes with a dual copper gigabit card with vlans and carp in em0. Had similar problem, but now they are working fine.

                              From dmesg:

                              em0: <intel(r) 1000="" pro="" network="" connection="" version="" -="" 3.2.18="">port 0x2400-0x243f mem 0xfe060000-0xfe07ffff,0xfe080000-0xfe0bffff irq 24 at device 5.0 on pci2
                              em0: Ethernet address: 00:04:23:c2:25:42
                              em1: <intel(r) 1000="" pro="" network="" connection="" version="" -="" 3.2.18="">port 0x2440-0x247f mem 0xfe100000-0xfe11ffff,0xfe0c0000-0xfe0fffff irq 25 at device 5.1 on pci2
                              em1: Ethernet address: 00:04:23:c2:25:43

                              See http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=752.0</intel(r)></intel(r)>

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • J
                                JanZ
                                last edited by

                                @NAmorim:

                                I have two nodes with a dual copper gigabit card with vlans and carp in em0. Had similar problem, but now they are working fine.

                                Copper runs fine, FC is a problem…

                                /jan

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • A
                                  agismaniax
                                  last edited by

                                  My machine occasionaly produce kernel error when I delete or create a new CARP.
                                  I missed to write down the error log, because the server stuck and restart by it self.
                                  After restart, it self check the file structure, found and fix some error in some files.
                                  Then my pfsense configuration is broke with the error "could not find xml configuration", and I must reinstall that machine.  :'( :'( :'(

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • J
                                    JanZ
                                    last edited by

                                    @NAmorim:

                                    I have two nodes with a dual copper gigabit card with vlans and carp in em0. Had similar problem, but now they are working fine.

                                    From dmesg:

                                    em0: <intel(r) 1000="" pro="" network="" connection="" version="" -="" 3.2.18="">port 0x2400-0x243f mem 0xfe060000-0xfe07ffff,0xfe080000-0xfe0bffff irq 24 at device 5.0 on pci2
                                    em0: Ethernet address: 00:04:23:c2:25:42
                                    em1: <intel(r) 1000="" pro="" network="" connection="" version="" -="" 3.2.18="">port 0x2440-0x247f mem 0xfe100000-0xfe11ffff,0xfe0c0000-0xfe0fffff irq 25 at device 5.1 on pci2
                                    em1: Ethernet address: 00:04:23:c2:25:43

                                    See http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=752.0</intel(r)></intel(r)>

                                    Hello… yes, solution on that link solved quite a bit of a problem, I did an CVS update and behaviour changed dramatically. Now CARP interfaces on FC em2 are not anymore in INIT state, but in weird state. advskew is normal (0 on master and 100 on slave), but states are all MASTER on slave node and some of them MASTER on master node and some of them SLAVE on master node...

                                    I feel like in release 0.96, CARP on VLAN behaved exactly the same on copper interfaces :)

                                    snap from ifconfig on master node:
                                    carp0: flags=49 <up,loopback,running>mtu 1500
                                            inet 192.168.222.1 netmask 0xffffff00
                                            carp: BACKUP vhid 1 advbase 1 advskew 0
                                    carp1: flags=49 <up,loopback,running>mtu 1500
                                            inet 192.168.223.1 netmask 0xffffffff
                                            carp: MASTER vhid 2 advbase 1 advskew 0
                                    carp2: flags=49 <up,loopback,running>mtu 1500
                                            inet 192.168.224.1 netmask 0xffffff00
                                            carp: MASTER vhid 3 advbase 1 advskew 0
                                    carp3: flags=49 <up,loopback,running>mtu 1500
                                            inet 81.24.100.7 netmask 0xfffffff0
                                            carp: BACKUP vhid 4 advbase 1 advskew 0

                                    snap from ifconfig on slave mode:
                                    carp0: flags=49 <up,loopback,running>mtu 1500
                                            inet 192.168.222.1 netmask 0xffffff00
                                            carp: MASTER vhid 1 advbase 1 advskew 100
                                    carp1: flags=49 <up,loopback,running>mtu 1500
                                            inet 192.168.223.1 netmask 0xffffffff
                                            carp: MASTER vhid 2 advbase 1 advskew 100
                                    carp2: flags=49 <up,loopback,running>mtu 1500
                                            inet 192.168.224.1 netmask 0xffffff00
                                            carp: MASTER vhid 3 advbase 1 advskew 100
                                    carp3: flags=49 <up,loopback,running>mtu 1500
                                            inet 81.24.100.7 netmask 0xfffffff0
                                            carp: MASTER vhid 4 advbase 1 advskew 100

                                    I also have tcpdump from em0 interface, when I enable CARP on slave and master goes from all MASTER to woohooo, if somebody is interested.
                                    http://haktar.select-tech.si/em2.dump.txt

                                    /jan</up,loopback,running></up,loopback,running></up,loopback,running></up,loopback,running></up,loopback,running></up,loopback,running></up,loopback,running></up,loopback,running>

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • S
                                      sullrich
                                      last edited by

                                      If the interfaces are in different states then pfsync is not communicating properly.

                                      A couple things to check:

                                      1. Use a dedicated sync interface and add allow all rules on it.  Set the sync interfaces into their own subnet 192.168.5.1 and 192.168.5.2 /24 so that they can communicate.
                                      2. Ping the other interface from each of the boxes to ensure connectivity (ping the 192.168.5.X ips)

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • J
                                        JanZ
                                        last edited by

                                        @sullrich:

                                        If the interfaces are in different states then pfsync is not communicating properly.

                                        A couple things to check:

                                        1. Use a dedicated sync interface and add allow all rules on it.  Set the sync interfaces into their own subnet 192.168.5.1 and 192.168.5.2 /24 so that they can communicate.
                                        2. Ping the other interface from each of the boxes to ensure connectivity (ping the 192.168.5.X ips)

                                        All checked. I use dedicated sync interface, connected with cross cable. 10.0.2.0/24 (.2 and .3) IP addreses used on that interfaces.

                                        Can ping each other on that interfaces.

                                        I created CARP addresses on primary and those addreses were synced over to slave host.

                                        Also Rules are synced with no issues…

                                        Sullrich, if you like, I can give you access to hosts in question, they are not production firewalls, their purpose is only to test those FC cards with pfsense...

                                        /jan

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • S
                                          sullrich
                                          last edited by

                                          Yes, go ahead and email me the information.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • J
                                            JanZ
                                            last edited by

                                            @sullrich:

                                            Yes, go ahead and email me the information.

                                            You got mail… :)

                                            /jan

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post