• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
Netgate Discussion Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

PfSense with FreeNAS in jail

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Virtualization
4 Posts 4 Posters 8.0k Views
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S
    sikander
    last edited by Jun 25, 2013, 8:20 AM

    Hi. Not completely shure if this is the right sub-forum.

    I have a 4GB i5 machine with pfSense running at home, but since it has a lot of free resources i was thinking about running FreeNAS besides it in a jail.
    Now i dont have a lot of experience in FreeBSD, so im not shure to exactly how i should do this and if it is even secure enough to be a smart solution.

    So what are your thoughts about this? Do you have any tips, or even better a FreeNAS-template i could put on it?

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • J
      jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
      last edited by Jun 28, 2013, 2:31 PM

      You would be a lot better off if you virtualized everything and ran them as separate VMs, rather than trying to nest one inside the other.

      I'm not sure if FreeNAS can run inside a jail, but even if it can, running any service like that on a firewall (even in a jail) is still questionable.

      With a VM setup (e.g. ESX, KVM, etc) you get better separation between the hosts. You lose a little performance, but then you could also put other things on ther besides pfSense and FreeNAS, too.

      Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

      Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

      Do not Chat/PM for help!

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • Z
        zenny
        last edited by Jun 28, 2013, 7:23 PM

        jimp is right. It is worth separating a firewall/gateway from the storage for scaleability.

        On the other hand, if you are planning to use zfs with freeNAS, then 4GB of RAM would be very little.

        I can give you my case. I am trying to run pfSense 2.1 as a UTM and a 1.5GB of RAM is throttling. I am going to upgrade to 4GB due to snort resource usage. Thus, if zfs requires at least 8GB of RAM for production environment with separate drive for ZIL/L2arch.

        A 4GB would be very resource-constrained. Just my two cents.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • T
          tritron
          last edited by Jun 29, 2013, 5:44 PM

          I run freenas under xen 4.3 and its work perfectly. It setup it that way because I had read comments that freenas works better that way.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          4 out of 4
          • First post
            4/4
            Last post
          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.
            This community forum collects and processes your personal information.
            consent.not_received