Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Outgoing Nat port issues

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Gaming
    6 Posts 3 Posters 5.5k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • W
      WarDave
      last edited by

      I was doing some reading on this forum and the one fix that I saw was suggested didn't work.

      I have tried checking "Enable advanced outbound NAT" under nat - outbound, then checking static port under the rule that gets created. It doesn't seem to help.

      This is the issue I'm having.

      NATTrace report (v1.01)

      Generated: 9/13/2007 8:23:49 PM (9/14/2007 1:23:49 AM UTC)
      Hostname: main
      adapter: NVIDIA nForce Networking Controller #2 - Packet Scheduler Miniport
      adapter: NVIDIA nForce Networking Controller - Packet Scheduler Miniport
        addresses: 192.168.1.5
        gateway: 192.168.1.1
      adapter: MS TCP Loopback interface

      Tests:
      Test 1: SUCCESS - Connect to fixed IP
        success
      Test 2: SUCCESS - Check NATTrace version
        success
      Test 3: SUCCESS - Perform DNS lookup
        success
      Test 4: SUCCESS - Connect to named host
        success
      Test 5: SUCCESS - Direct TCP to fixed IP
        success
      Test 6: SUCCESS - Direct TCP (web) to named host
        success
      Test 7: SUCCESS - Direct TCP (6112) to named host
        success
      Test 8: SUCCESS - Direct UDP (6112) to fixed IP
        success
      Test 9: SUCCESS - Direct UDP (6112) to named host
        success
      Test 10: FAILED - NAT check, port 6112
        NAT detected (Expected send on port 6112, went on port 53858 instead)
      Test 11: SUCCESS - Direct UDP (port 9103)
        success
      Test 12: FAILED - NAT check, port 9103
        NAT detected (Expected send on port 9103, went on port 57482 instead)
      Test 13: SUCCESS - Direct UDP (port 30350)
        success
      Test 14: FAILED - NAT check, port 30350
        NAT detected (Expected send on port 30350, went on port 53367 instead)
      Test 15: SUCCESS - Direct UDP (port 30351)
        success
      Test 16: FAILED - NAT check, port 30351
        NAT detected (Expected send on port 30351, went on port 56723 instead)

      4 tests failed

      Any suggestions?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • C
        cmb
        last edited by

        If you make that change and apply changes, that'll do it. You may want to try clearing the firewall state table.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • W
          WarDave
          last edited by

          I tried that and even rebooted with no luck.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • GruensFroeschliG
            GruensFroeschli
            last edited by

            these ports look extremly like supreme commander.
            take a look at my thread about supreme commander in the game section.
            i had the same problems but it works here with multiple static port rules for every single port .
            (from top to down 5 rules)

            1:6112 static port yes
            2:9103 static port yes
            3:30350 static port yes
            4:30351 static port yes
            5: everything static port no

            We do what we must, because we can.

            Asking questions the smart way: http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • W
              WarDave
              last edited by

              Yea it is SupCom, and my old setup was m0n0wall and forwarding ports is different here then in m0n0wall but I will look for that thread.  Thanks

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • W
                WarDave
                last edited by

                That worked out for me, thanks for your help.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • First post
                  Last post
                Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.